On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:57:26 - Colin Watson
<cjwat...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:14:07PM -0000, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > And it isn't a "hack", this is exactly what ifup/down scripts are
> > for.
>
> They're useful for g
tworks. I would not remove this because if you remove it you're
going to harm anyone who changes addresses frequently.
However, I have not used Ubuntu in many years (this is 2017, the bug
report was 2007) and I am no longer in a position to help you.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@pie
isn't a "hack", this is exactly what ifup/down scripts are for.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1674330
Title:
Please
Dave Walker davewal...@ubuntu.com writes:
Can this bug be reproduced on Lucid?
I'm not running Lucid yet. However, you can check if the defect is there
just by reading a couple of files, you don't need to ask anyone to
reproduce it.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
Dave Walker davewal...@ubuntu.com writes:
Can this bug be reproduced on Lucid?
I'm not running Lucid yet. However, you can check if the defect is there
just by reading a couple of files, you don't need to ask anyone to
reproduce it.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
At this point I'm unsubscribing from the bug report. I no longer know,
or care, if the problem is still extant. Maybe it is and maybe it isn't,
but after a couple of years of the bug living in limbo I've ceased to
care, and I'm no longer running an Ubuntu laptop.
--
ntp daemon not reconfigured
One would imagine that this bug could have been fixed any time in the
last couple of years. It would require editing a couple of files on the
part of one of the maintainers. Is there a good reason this has not been
completed?
--
ipmi modules need to manually inserted and device created
I've unsubscribed from the bug report. It could have been fixed in a few
minutes one way or another at any time over the last few years but no
one did, which is a sad commentary on the management of the project.
Anyway, after years of this bug report remaining in limbo I've ceased to
care what
At this point I'm unsubscribing from the bug report. I no longer know,
or care, if the problem is still extant. Maybe it is and maybe it isn't,
but after a couple of years of the bug living in limbo I've ceased to
care, and I'm no longer running an Ubuntu laptop.
--
ntp daemon not reconfigured
One would imagine that this bug could have been fixed any time in the
last couple of years. It would require editing a couple of files on the
part of one of the maintainers. Is there a good reason this has not been
completed?
--
ipmi modules need to manually inserted and device created
I've unsubscribed from the bug report. It could have been fixed in a few
minutes one way or another at any time over the last few years but no
one did, which is a sad commentary on the management of the project.
Anyway, after years of this bug report remaining in limbo I've ceased to
care what
rna r...@horobi.com writes:
Perry E. Metzger wrote on 2009-09-14:
No it isn't. Other operating systems don't have the problem.
Chip has bug, but the workaround there, the patch said.
Whether other OSes have workarounds or whether the bug is purely in the
software, the effect on the end user
rna r...@horobi.com writes:
This is a bug of chipset.
No it isn't. Other operating systems don't have the problem.
Perry
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
left untouched for years.
Please note that every me too and why isn't this fixed
yet spams many people's inboxes with these useless messages.
They're only useless if you believe the problem should be ignored.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
ehci_hcd module
chiacchio chiacc...@gmail.com writes:
2009/7/28 markofealing m...@ferns16.plus.com
I really can't believe that this has not been fixed, I mean USB 2.0 is
THE way of connecting devices to PCs these days.
Come on guys, sort out your priorities. It's stupid bugs like this which
return Ubuntu
kernel-janitor le...@canonical.com writes:
This bug report was marked as Incomplete and has not had any updated
comments for quite some time. As a result this bug is being closed.
Please reopen if this is still an issue in the current Ubuntu release
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download .
mira meerajpa...@yahoo.com writes:
I had the similar problem happened just today and i really need help
with it. If some body knows anything, please let me know. I tried to
install wireless driver on my Ubuntu 8.04 since it is not able to
configure the internal wireless card, i tried to use
with a USB
problem has tossed in a report onto this -- there's a massive smog that
makes it hard for people to figure out what is actually going on.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Stefano_PG slot...@libero.it writes:
Today I noticed that my VIA based PCI controller seems to be affected by
this bug too. It always runs well, but if I plug more than one device
the controller resets.
That's not the same bug.
Perry
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
btanoue btan...@hotmail.com writes:
I recently found a new work-around that works for my system. I stumbled
on this by accident. I ran out of USB ports on my desktop box, and
purchased a CyberPower (Powered USB Hub) off Buy.com.
This is not a new work around. There are others earlier in the
dhd dhugg...@cs.cmu.edu writes:
I'm really amazed that the upstream developers are either not aware or
don't want to fix this!
I filed a bug report. So far, it appears to have been rigorously
ignored. I'm still hoping.
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
network
Steve Conklin steve.conk...@canonical.com writes:
This doesn't appear to be a problem with any particular driver, so I'm
removing it from kernel bugs
Well, it might still prove to be a misdesign in the kernel interface to
wireless drivers in general.
Perry
--
network-manager roams to (none)
Howard Chu h...@symas.com writes:
Interesting. Is that WPA with a Pre-Shared Key? I use WPA/EAP and
obviously had the problem. Haven't tried WPA2 at all.
My bad behavior is easily reproduced on a WEP network. I think it
happens regardless of the type of encryption in use.
--
Perry E. Metzger
of a regression to me.
I think not having your network function is a bit more of a regression.
Clearly there are a number of issues in NetworkManager, of course.
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none))
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Alexander Jones a...@weej.com writes:
Regardless of whether I am connected or not, when I open the NM menu to see
broadcast networks, it is going to have to scan then, right?
No, not necessarily.
Perry
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none))
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291760
You
this is ipw2100.
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none))
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
is describing. It has
*similar* symptoms, I'll fully agree, but not *identical* symptoms.
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none))
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291760
You received this bug notification because you are a member
, I've already
spent as much time as I can afford on this, and I prefer the behavior
with my patch to a NM that continues to invoke useless scans.
As do I, my machine is now working again.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #580185
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580185
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none))
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
LuisMondesi lem...@gmail.com writes:
I got this same issue on an OQO model 02 with Jaunty
I don't see that from your dmesgs at all. At the very least, you haven't
shown us the critical dmesgs.
In any case, does applying the patch fix things for you? If not, you
have a different problem,
be an issue on Jaunty for some corner cases but I haven't been paying
attention -- Jaunty is too new, and given how long it has been I haven't
even looked at all the scripts currently involved -- nothing quite like
having a bug report ignored for this long.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none))
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
I can confirm that the patch Howard Chu has posted to NetworkManager
eliminates the bad behavior for me. I'm no longer getting disconnected
every 120 seconds and the network is far more usable as a result.
--
network-manager roams to (none) ((none))
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291760
You
A version of the fixes to libxcb for Intrepid would be highly
appreciated. Anyone have a patched package for me to test out?
--
[MASTER] firefox-3.0b5 received an X Window System error: 'BadIDChoice'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220628
You received this bug notification because you are a
The problem is straightforward to see and is easy to confirm.
** Changed in: ipmitool (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
ipmi modules need to manually inserted and device created
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110992
You received this bug notification because you are a member
The problem is straightforward to see and is easy to confirm.
** Changed in: ipmitool (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
ipmi modules need to manually inserted and device created
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110992
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Way to go with the sensitive treatment of the community, Jon Thomas!
People sit around waiting for a couple of years for a support issue to
be fixed for their hardware, limping along when things could Just Work
with minimal effort. Therefore, the right thing is to say to yourself
oh, the new
Jonathan Thomas echidna...@kubuntu.org writes:
Amarok 2.0 no longer supports Rio Karma, so closing.
You know, in addition to the quality of your prose, I've gone over the
Amarok web site and I've been unable to find evidence that they dumped
Karma support. Not that (as I've noted) any of that
Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@gmail.com writes:
Perry: Please cool down. Jonathan is handling a few hundred bugs a
day sometimes.
So?
And the Kubuntu team has limited resources which need to be used
wisely. Would you rather have a new package/a fixed bug or him
spending a lot of time on
Jonathan Thomas echidna...@kubuntu.org writes:
See the last comment here: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132713
Note the URL doesn't claim that it is policy not to support the Karma,
just that the work hasn't been done yet.
Lets forget that, though. There's a much deeper problem.
Troy James Sobotka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Editorial Alert
Finally, I'd add that those who are disillusioned with Free Software
I'm not disillusioned with free software. I'm being forced to switch
from Ubuntu. There is a difference between being disillusioned with
free software and having
Troy James Sobotka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am wondering if there is anything we can do collectively to help this
along?
I think no one is looking at it. The first step would have to be to
get someone at Canonical to pay active attention to the problem and
take responsibility for having it
zasq [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does someone know if the problem will be fixed soon?
I don't know for sure, but my strong suspicion is that no one who is
in a position to fix the problem has any intention of ever working on
it. This report has been open for a long time and nothing much has
ph3ar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My issue has been solved with this trick taken from
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/221983
** Attachment added: usb_no_key_bug?
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19579922/usb_no_key_bug%3F
This looks utterly unrelated to the problem most
and vista exposed similar device bugs which
sent vendors scurrying to produce driver updates.
That's not even a remotely apt analogy. Among other things, this bug
has been around since before the release of Vista and no one intends
to fix it.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED
TheBigT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is another confirmation that things are as horrible as they ever
were after an update to Intrepid RC.
Same here. Nothing has changed, and given how little attention has
been paid so far, I doubt this bug will ever be fixed.
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O
.
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The aironet card on my ThinkPad T30 works fine with the new kernel.
But did you have the problem before?
--
Cisco Aironet stopped working in Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug Watch Updater [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
** Changed in: linux
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
What!?!?!? Why was this changed to Invalid? It hits me almost every
day!
Perry
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You received this
TDB [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey!
Invalid? It's BROKEN!!!
Not to mention that hundreds of people have had the problem, and a
dozen duplicate problem reports got merged into this one.
Perry
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You
mouz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is present on:
- dapper: yes
- feisty: yes
- gutsy: no
- hardy: no
- intrepid: no
What do you mean by the problem is not present -- what restarts ntpd
on gutsy or hardy? I still had this issue on Hardy when I last
checked -- I manually installed
under these
circumstances. In fact, I observe it getting significantly off, which
is quite irritating and the reason I figured out there was a problem
in the first place.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ntp daemon not reconfigured by /etc/network
https
Hew McLachlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need
to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments.
I don't see what you are talking about. The information is all there.
Please reopen it if you can give us the
, as the bug report is most certainly *not*
incomplete.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
ntp daemon not reconfigured by /etc/network
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120199
You received this bug
Hew [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in it recently.
That's not my fault. I reported a bug and no one bothered to try
fixing it. That doesn't mean
Hew [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. I have tested using pool.ntp.org and it works well. This
should be technically easy to implement, if it's decided this feature is
worthwhile.
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Hew [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can read the status and importance guidelines at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status and
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance .
I'm aware of them. The designation you've made makes no sense. I think
it is based on the fact that you don't understand the bug
, and it will not
have the time properly synchronized.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ntp daemon not reconfigured by /etc/network
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120199
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Hew [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If the fix is straightforward, you may submit it yourself.
I did. Read the bug report. It is editing two lines in a file (or
restoring the file with the two lines edited if it was removed in
Intrepid).
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED
FoolsRun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have solved this problem on my system by replacing my USB 2.0 PCI
card.
That's not practical if you have a laptop.
Perry
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You received this bug notification
. The problem is getting someone to
take it seriously to do something about it.
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a new bug for me as of Hardy. And rmmod'ing ehci_hcd doesn't
help any. It makes it worse, even.
Then it might not be the same bug.
Perry
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You
Oisín Mac Fhearaí [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hard to believe this bug hasn't been fixed yet tbh. There's obviously
some workaround which allows other operating systems to deal with it
and suspend/resume normally as well.
A number of OSes seem to manage it just fine, yes.
Perry
--
ehci_hcd
Following the previous directions (with a few difficulties -- I needed
to get the amarok_riokarma-mediadevice.desktop file out of the amarok
sources), I got my Karma working under Hardy. It would be nice to make
the thing automatically mount when it is plugged in (which I don't know
how to do) but
Leann Ogasawara [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just to see if it makes a difference, care to test the Intrepid Ibex
8.10 kernel?
[instructions on how to test elided]
Please let us know your results. Thanks.
This appears to fix my problems with my T40 -- at the very least, boot
proceeded normally
** Attachment added: lspci -vnn output
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14471955/lspci-vnn.log
--
Problems with CD/DVD drive on IBM Thinkpad T41 under Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229556
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Attachment added: dmesg.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14471931/dmesg.log
--
Problems with CD/DVD drive on IBM Thinkpad T41 under Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229556
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Under Hardy, I'm experiencing the following problems with my CD/DVD
(removable) drive:
1) When sleeping, the power light on the CD/DVD drive remains on, and
from what I can tell based on battery drain times, it appears that the
drive is indeed consuming power. Clearly
Now, without any real explanation, it seems to be working again. The
report can be closed.
--
mplayer no longer works under Hardy on IBM T41
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225780
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
rod40cool [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think this bug is solved for me. The solution for me was to not use
the front USB ports on the front of the case but instead plug my ipod
into one of the usb ports on the back of the case which are directly
mounted on the motherboard.
That's not a
Daniel Gimpelevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On May 3, 2008, at 8:24 AM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
That's not a solution. You're almost certainly just using the low
speed ports instead of the high speed ports. It should not be the case
that some people have difficulty using USB high speed
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mplayer
Running under Hardy on an IBM Thinkpad T41 laptop, mplayer no longer
works at all. (Neither, it appears, does Totem.)
If I try to play a video from the shell, mplayer hangs for a while, then
pops up a window with what appears to be the first
I can now confirm that Hardy still has the same problem.
--
USB problems on IBM T41 laptop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98608
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Leann Ogasawara [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This seems to be a duplicate of bug 88746. Care to take a look. I
realize it's a rather long thread of comments to follow, but I'd point
you to comment
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/88746/comments/228
which was made by
pongtawat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RC is out, so it is likely that you and me are left to stay with 2.6.22
kernel :(
I can't understand why this bug report is being ignored.
Perry
--
IBM T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this bug
might fix the bug.
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
IBM T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
pongtawat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FYI, Gutsy 2.6.22 kernel seems to work fine.
That is my experience too. If I boot an old kernel, I have no problem
at all. This is absolutely a regression against Gutsy.
Perry
--
IBM T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
I note that the bug report is still listed as incomplete although it
has been some days since I posted the requested information. The clock
is also ticking on auto-deleting the bug report. Is there something else
I need to add before the report will be considered complete? I'd hate to
have report
** Summary changed:
- T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
+ IBM T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
** Description changed:
- I upgraded a T40 to Hardy. The machine goes quite nuts with a 2.6.24
- kernel -- booting the old 2.6.22 kernel works more or less fine.
- Symptoms include a
Leann Ogasawara [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you able to at least make it through the boot process to be able to
grab some log information?
Yes, I can do that.
If so, can you attach the following (be sure to attach each as a
separate file and not as a tarball).
Will do right now.
* cat
** Attachment added: version.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13098056/version.log
--
T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Attachment added: dmesg.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13098087/dmesg.log
--
T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Attachment added: lspci-vvnn.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13098098/lspci-vvnn.log
--
T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
By the way, things have improved slightly. With the absolutely latest
Hardy kernel, boot still hangs for quite a while before succeeding and
sound is still dead, but the ethernet now comes up. The wireless is
still dead, though.
--
T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
Public bug reported:
I upgraded a T40 to Hardy. The machine goes quite nuts with a 2.6.24
kernel -- booting the old 2.6.22 kernel works more or less fine.
Symptoms include a long hang during hardware probes and failure to
properly initialize a bunch of the hardware thereafter.
** Affects: linux
I just realized, I should have said an IBM Thinkpad T40. I'm not
entirely sure what sort of machine information will be needed by
whomever will be helping to debug this -- just tell me what commands
to run and I'll post the output here. (Please specify if you need me
to be running the broken
that much).
GPS signals can be externally corrupted with an appropriate
transmitter as well. There is no actual way to prove you have the
correct time. (This is one reason very few protocols require accurate
timekeeping for security.)
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED
Alexander Konovalenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm concerned with the security implications of using a pool of unknown
time servers per default.
Most other OSes out there do this or variations on it now, so it would
hardly be an Ubuntu specific problem.
There are only security problems for
This would appear to be the same as 98608, which I reported a year ago.
--
Cannot mount USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95428
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Jukka Laurila [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gutsy has the same problem and the temporary workaround rmmod ehci_ucd
works there as well.
Wouldn't it be nice if we didn't have to use a workaround.
Perry
--
USB problems on IBM T41 laptop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98608
You received this bug
Pedro Villavicencio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This does not appear to be a bug report and we are closing it.
It would be neat if you guys could spend as much time paying attention
to complaints as you did to stifling them. The complaint, I will note,
was not about the bug itself.
We
I'm starting to wonder whether anyone actually cares at all. Five months
and you can't even assign a priority to the bug?
--
USB problems on IBM T41 laptop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98608
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact
Public bug reported:
I reported 98608 a very long time ago.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/98608
The person assigned to it seems to have ignored it in the interim. (I
note by clicking on his name that he seems to have done the same thing
to many other bug
Until someone actually bothers to touch the original bug report, I'm
afraid that declaring this one invalid isn't going to help either.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Invalid = New
--
A bug I reported has been in limbo for 5 months.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144089
You received this
Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Filing another bug isn't going to help.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New = Invalid
And what will help? Shutting up and ignoring things perpetually?
This is a valid bug. It is a bug in the bug management
system. Declaring it invalid isn't
Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unless you have a Canonical support contract, the fact that a bug isn't
fixed as quickly as you would like isn't a bug.
I didn't ask that it be *fixed*. It could be a legitimately hard
problem that might take years to fix, or it might be that I'm one
anyone
knowing whether they're important or not.
(The particular responsible party appears to have left many hundreds
of bug reports in this state, which appears to be unusual. A proper
tracking system would have escalated that at some point.)
--
Perry E. Metzger[EMAIL PROTECTED
Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i somehow must be blind ... can you tell me where those log messages end
up for you?
grep for them in /var/log if you're running NetworkManager. They're
pretty unmistakable.
Perry
--
Executes wpa_supplicant in too verbose mode
Does it really take three months to decide if a bug that prevents users
from touching any USB high speed peripheral is important or not?
--
USB problems on IBM T41 laptop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98608
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
FYI, this need not stay wishlist for long -- it will take
less than five minutes to actually add ssh.
Just to make it clear:
in
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
