Public bug reported:
1)
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 14.10
Release:14.10
2)
$ apt-cache policy gstreamer-1.0
gstreamer-1.0-pulseaudio:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: (none)
Version table:
gir1.2-gstreamer-1.0:
Installed: 1.4.3-1
Candidate: 1.4.3-1
Version table:
gnome-terminal stores the scrollback content in a temporary file, opened
at the standard location which is /tmp by default, overridable with the
standard TMPDIR environment variable
this default/standard location /tmp is certainly inadmissible, since it's
an obvious welcome hackers breach.
the reason I think this is the unlimited gnome-terminal window is
this:
when I run the same application with
./app /dev/null
the / partition does not overflow
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
I have two partitions on my system:
$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda3 23G 12G 11G 52% /
/dev/sda6 98G 67G 27G 72% /home
When I run a user application (on /home) which produces lots of
debugging output to the terminal, it quickly (less than a day)
Public bug reported:
I am running several I/O intensive applications creating and deleting
many files on the separate /home partition. After about a day of
operation my root file system / containing everything except /home goes
100% full, although running ncdu -x from / shows just about 50%
now 5 hours from my initial report
#df -h
hangs *indefinetely*,
whereas ncdu -x from / shows about 1/2 fullness (my root patition / is
about 23G)
9,3GiB [##] /usr
strace dies as well
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319667
Title:
root file system 100% full, goes 52% after reboot
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
1. I don't keep many files open forever, they are duly closed after
being used. Many created, filled up, closed, uploaded, and erased.
2. FIles get created on /home
3. / get overflown, not /home
4. If your explanation were correct, /home would have been overflown.
5. I think you explanation
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319667
Title:
root file system 100% full, goes 52% after reboot
To manage
Public bug reported:
A routine
aptitude update
aptitude upgrade
erased the smb.conf file; the definitions of my all shares simply
disappeared.
There were no question asked, but I saw (on the screen) samba packages
configured and the samba server restarted
1.
root@fpu:/etc/samba# lsb_release
Public bug reported:
A routine
aptitude update
aptitude upgrade
erased the smb.conf file; the definitions of my all shares simply
disappeared.
There were no question asked, but I saw (on the screen) samba packages
configured and the samba server restarted
1.
root@fpu:/etc/samba# lsb_release
Public bug reported:
12.04
Unity
After the upgrade to 12.04 the Unity launch panel which I set to auto
hide does not reliably reappear when I move the cursor over the left
edge of the screen, and I have to repeat it several times. This same
behavior is reproduced on several computers, with
Ubutu One is the biggest failure inflicting on the GNU/Linux/Ubuntu
public image.
This project should be stopped ASAP to cause no further damage to Linux
and Ubuntu.
I am regularly reporting on their big time failures ,just trying to
install and run Ubuntu One on different platforms (I would
agreed, it's rubbish, never worked and never will. I used to give it a
try once a few months but now completely fed up. Waste of your time +
loss of your data. This project should be cancelled asap as causing
irreparable damage to Ubuntu and Linux
--
You received this bug notification because
Public bug reported:
during upgrade from 11.04 to 11.10
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-12.51-server 2.6.38.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-12-server x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874965
Title:
blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1: blcr kernel module failed to build
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
during upgrade from 11.04 to 11.10
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: ecb 2.40+cvs20110608-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-12.51-server 2.6.38.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-12-server x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Oct
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874961
Title:
package ecb 2.40 cvs20110608-1 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
error
Public bug reported:
during upgrade from 11.04 to 11.10
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: selinux 1:0.9
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.50-generic 2.6.38.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic i686
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Oct 15 11:58:27
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874985
Title:
package selinux 1:0.9 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage:
subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 127
Hi, Pedro!
I checked it on the i386 Ubuntu 11.04 adding/deleting 6 users, and it
worked fine.
Will now check on the 64 bit version.
Regards,
Sergei
sergei@nash:~$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 11.04
Release:11.04
sergei@nash:~$ apt-cache policy gnome-control-center
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
sergei@tp:~/Downloads$
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Sergei Vorobyov svorob...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Pedro!
I checked it on the i386 Ubuntu 11.04 adding/deleting 6 users, and it
worked fine.
Will now check on the 64 bit version.
Regards,
Sergei
sergei@nash
-admin:3394): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref:
assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
(users-admin:3394): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref:
assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Sergei Vorobyov svorob...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Pedro!
I checked
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-control-center
1.
r...@tp:~# lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.10
Release:10.10
2.
r...@tp:~# apt-cache policy gnome-control-center
gnome-control-center:
Installed: 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu2
Candidate: 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu2
Version
--
users groups clicked from gnome-control-center hangs forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I'd be damned, but this does not explain anything
Many posters here IMO have a different booting problem. The error
message however relates to a specific bug with plymouth which is fixed
here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/649917.
The fix code is now available in
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23.
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/controlC0: sergei 7726 F pulseaudio
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Card0.Amixer.info:
Card hw:0 'SB'/'HDA ATI SB at
apport information
** Attachment added: AcpiTables.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731027/+files/AcpiTables.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification because
apport information
** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731028/+files/AlsaDevices.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification because
apport information
** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731029/+files/AplayDevices.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification
apport information
** Attachment added: ArecordDevices.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731030/+files/ArecordDevices.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification
apport information
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731031/+files/BootDmesg.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification because you
apport information
** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731032/+files/Card0.Amixer.values.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug
apport information
** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731033/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug
apport information
** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731034/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification
apport information
** Attachment added: IwConfig.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731035/+files/IwConfig.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification because you
apport information
** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731036/+files/Lspci.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification because you are a
apport information
** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731037/+files/Lsusb.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification because you are a
apport information
** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731038/+files/PciMultimedia.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731039/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification because
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731040/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731041/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification because
apport information
** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731042/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification because you are a
apport information
** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731043/+files/UdevLog.txt
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification because you are
apport information
** Attachment added: WifiSyslog.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/604580/+attachment/1731044/+files/WifiSyslog.txt
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired = New
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
After upgrading to 10.10 from 10.04 a few days ago I experience this
very same problem:
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
on *every* login from the client.
I made all updates and upgrades as suggested in
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP/UpdatingChroot
The remedy from post #1 did not work for me
--
getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0) on ltsp client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604580
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
the same message appears in 10.10 64 bit when you try to log on the ltsp
client, see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/604580?comments=all
--
Glib-WARNING **: getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknow user id (0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590326
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
1)
r...@ubuntu:~# lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
Release:10.04
BTW: 10.10-desktop-amd64.iso DOES NOT see at all the SSD /dev/sdc,
which 10.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso recognizes OK
2)
r...@ubuntu:~# apt-cache
** Attachment added: syslog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665791/+attachment/1708853/+files/syslog
--
ubiquity systematicall fails to install on Expresscard SSD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Attachment added: /var/log/messages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/665791/+attachment/1708865/+files/messages
--
ubiquity systematicall fails to install on Expresscard SSD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665791
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Attachment added: /var/log/partman
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/665791/+attachment/1708866/+files/partman
--
ubiquity systematicall fails to install on Expresscard SSD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665791
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Attachment added: /var/log/kern.log
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/665791/+attachment/1708867/+files/kern.log
--
ubiquity systematicall fails to install on Expresscard SSD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665791
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Attachment added: /var/log/udev
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/665791/+attachment/1708873/+files/udev
--
ubiquity systematicall fails to install on Expresscard SSD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665791
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: usb-creator
1)
r...@ubuntu:/mnt# lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
Release:10.04
2)
r...@ubuntu:/mnt# apt-cache policy usb-creator-gtk
usb-creator-gtk:
Installed: 0.2.22
Candidate: 0.2.22.1
Version table:
0.2.22.1 0
** Attachment added: /var/log/syslog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654016/+attachment/1668887/+files/syslog
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654016/+attachment/166/+files/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: UsbCreatorLog.txt
on another computer, on which I prepare bootable usb sticks (different Linux
distributions and releases),
usb-createator started to fail (all with ubuntu*.iso):
r...@tp:~# lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu maverick (development branch)
Release:10.10
r...@tp:~# grep usb-cr
Looks like, I found the reason (which still seems a bug in usb-creator).
It appears to create an extra log file .cache/usb-creator.log, looking into
which I discovered
too many unmounted loop (possibly mounted by usb-creator):
r...@tp:~# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available
After reformatting the usb stick (FAT32, default on my Win 7, just to be sure I
am using it
fresh)
tried again, and it silently disappeared after creating the persistent file
and
creating an ext3 filesystem on it, leaving in .cache/usb-creator.log:
usb-creator 2010-10-03 18:53:14,799 (DEBUG)
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: parted
1)
r...@ubuntu:~# lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
Release:10.04
The same happens with 10.10rc of 1 Oct 2010
2)
r...@ubuntu:~# apt-cache policy parted
parted:
Installed: 2.2-5ubuntu5
Candidate: 2.2-5ubuntu5
Version
** Attachment added: /var/log/syslog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653760/+attachment/1667404/+files/syslog
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653760/+attachment/1667405/+files/Dependencies.txt
--
parted hangs during installation on SSD
here goes /var/log/partman
(sorry, just one attachment at a time is allowed)?field.comment=here
goes /var/log/partman
(sorry, just one attachment at a time is allowed)
** Attachment added: /var/log/partman
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
1) 10.04 and 10.10beta (daily build of 30/09), 64-bit
2) ubiquity 2.4.4
3) expected it works
4) it doesn't
When I launch Live Ubuntu (try without installing on your computer) from a
memory stick,
fdisk -l shows correctly all available disks:
** Attachment added: Casper.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652886/+attachment/1662306/+files/Casper.gz
** Attachment added: UbiquityDebug.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652886/+attachment/1662307/+files/UbiquityDebug.gz
** Attachment added: UbiquityPartman.gz
/var/log/syslog
** Attachment added: syslog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/652886/+attachment/1662319/+files/apport.ubiquity.mhRpMT.apport
--
ubiquity install hangs, 10.04, 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652886
You received this bug notification because you
as I said the bug report system is very buggy:
the previous post actually contains apport.ubuquity.blabla
this is my attempt to attach two files: syslog and apport, only the last
one was attached
The true syslog is attached here
** Attachment added: true syslog
confirming what I already said elsewhere: buggywise, Ubuntu becomes more
and more M$oftish
--
ubiquity install hangs, 10.04, 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652886
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I tried the latest alternate today's 10.10rc built
It hangs indefinitely with the following two lines:
1. partman: No matching physical volumes found
2. partman: Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while.
This while lasts without any progress for hours.
--
ubiquity install hangs,
Duanedesign,
I did as you suggested, several times, all 10 steps successfully.
But it still does not connect (sync failed in Tomboy, without any explanations)
I am attaching the required files.
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:07 PM, duanedesign duanedes...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Sergei,
Sorry to hear
Thank you, Duanedesign!
I will try your recipe as soon as I get to that (remote) computer and
send you the requested logs.
Meanwhile, U1 started to behave erratically even on this computer (I am
communicating from),
which worked flawlessly before. The sync daemon eats up a lot of CPU cycles:
Yet another bug: it only allows for attaching just one file
** Attachment added: syncdaemon-exceptions.log
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-client/+bug/638858/+attachment/1605219/+files/syncdaemon-exceptions.log
--
U1 does not connect or connects erratically
This is the third file attached
** Attachment added: syncdaemon.log
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-client/+bug/638858/+attachment/1605221/+files/syncdaemon.log
--
U1 does not connect or connects erratically
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638858
You received this bug
Ubuntu seems to become a real MS competitor: I wonder how it is possible to
make so many errors in
just 3 lines: one cron and two rsync commands
--
U1 does not connect or connects erratically
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638858
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client
1) Ubuntu release and 2) U1 package version were collected
autonmatically by ubuntu-bug.
3) I have been expecting U1 to start working, for a few months.
4) It does not.
I have several computers connected to U1, most of them work,
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638858/+attachment/1587727/+files/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: UbuntuOneClientPackages.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638858/+attachment/1587728/+files/UbuntuOneClientPackages.txt
** Attachment added:
Besides, on the Computers connected to this account
https://one.ubuntu.com/account/machines/
one can only remove, but not add computers. Why?
--
U1 does not connect or connects erratically
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638858
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Despite ps aux shows
sergei 10389 0.1 0.1 244752 30420 ? SL 11:21 0:01 /usr/bin/python
/usr/lib/ubuntuone-client/ubuntuone-login
no login prompt pops up
--
U1 does not connect or connects erratically
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638858
You received this bug notification because you are a
Confirmed, same kind of behavior on my Ubuntu 10.04.
In good old days raids survived even complete system reinstallations and
migrations to different distributions.
In Ubuntu they don't even survive reboots.
See:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/601305
--
mdadm configures
Ubuntu 10.04 RAID/grub blues continue:
I returned back to my server and decided to upgrade to the new kernel,
from ...-23 to ...-24, now:
r...@thor:~# uname -a
Linux thor 2.6.32-24-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 28 05:14:15 UTC 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
The opposite scenario (see the description
A *very* strange thing suddenly happened.
Around the upgrade to
Linux thor 2.6.32-23-generic #37-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 11 08:03:28 UTC 2010
x86_64 GNU/Linux
my device mapping suddenly changed:
1) before the three identical partitions for raid0 were /dev/sda1, sdb1,
sdc1, and the system booted
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: grub
1)
ser...@thor:~$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
Release:10.04
2)
ser...@thor:~$ apt-cache policy grub
grub:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 0.97-29ubuntu60
Version table:
0.97-29ubuntu60 0
500
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tomboy
1)
ser...@dell:~$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
Release:10.04
ser...@dell:~$ uname -a
Linux dell 2.6.32-22-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 3 22:02:19 UTC 2010 i686
GNU/Linux
2)
ser...@dell:~$ apt-cache policy tomboy
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apt
Greetings!
Upgrading 9.10-10.04 on 5 IBM blade servers resulted in numerous dependency
bugs with lots of reboots required,
freezes, and requests (from apt) to
dpkg --configure -a
run it with the --fix-missing option.
In total took me about 2
** Attachment added: contents of /var/log/dist-upgrade created by tar cvzf
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50941642/b03.tgz
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50941232/Dependencies.txt
--
Numerous bugs on 9.10-10.04 upgrade
Please disregard the last part of my post pertainng to amd64, since I am
reporting a bug from a laptop remotely connected to the blade servers.
Besides, filing a bug allows for just one attachment. I add the other 4
by adding comments
** Attachment added: b00.tgz
b01.tgz
** Attachment added: b01.tgz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50941764/b01.tgz
--
Numerous bugs on 9.10-10.04 upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598761
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
b02.tgz
** Attachment added: b02.tgz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50941775/b02.tgz
--
Numerous bugs on 9.10-10.04 upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598761
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
b04.tgz
Forgot to mention:
1. my servers automatically update very often (in /etc/crontab), so my 9.10 was
not rusty before I started the upgrade to 10.04
2. during the upgrade there were also numerous reports only partial update
will/can be made forcing me to recontinue after it's
been
Maybe this is unrelated, but nevertheless:
when I tried to Computer Janitor, on each blade it took several (3-5)
iterations before all obsolete/uneeded packages were wiped out, i.e.,
the janitor cannot resolve dependencies in just one go. However,
dependencies are represented as a DAG so one
Thank you, hope it will work and I will test it asap. However,
I am traveling and will be away from my server until Wednesday
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Colin Watson cjwat...@canonical.com wrote:
I cannot reproduce your GRUB problems. With my fixed parted and busybox
packages applied to
Unfortunately:
1. Ubuntu 10.04 rescue option does not have scp and ssh (I wanted to
scp them but could not), whereas CentOS 5.4, which has them, does not like
ext4.
2. Ubuntu Live does not understand RAIDs
3. Thus the logs have gone with the CentOS installation
4. Moreover, I started
Same problem with Lucid server amd64 run as Xen virtual guest under
CentOS 5.4
[r...@thor ~]# uname -a
Linux thor 2.6.18-164.el5xen #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 04:03:03 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
mountall: Plymouth command failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557161
You received this
The partman in the server installer from the daily distribution
20100419.1 is even more erroneous.
I decided to simplify matters by installing a small extra IDE/ATA disk for the
system
keeping the 3 x 2TB SATA disks for manual configuration (as soon as partman is
raid
ignorant and buggy).
The
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: grub2
ubuntu-server-amd64 daily 20100419.1 and preceding versions fail to
install correctly
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/527401
starting from message #24 (see also #34, where forking is suggested)
** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
CentOS 5.4 installed on the same configuration (no bios tweaks) without any
problems,
recognizing
160GB hdd as hda
3 x 2TB hdds as sda, sdb, sdc, resp.,
and correctly installing grub on hda's MBR
Suffices to borrow their installer and partman
--
partman and grub2 fail in server amd64
I repeated the installation experiment twice, this time with 3 SATA disks on
AHCI (yesterday
they were on IDE):
1. with 10.04-beta2-server-amd64
2. with the daily server-amd64 (18/4/2010)
getting basically the same results for /boot on raid1.
After 1) the system booted once but stopped
syslog attachment to the previous message (this system cannot even take
1 attachments ;-)
** Attachment added: syslog
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44694787/syslog
--
grub-installer fails to install on a raid1 array
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527401
You received this bug notification
Once again, the simple recipe in message #30 above allowed me to boot an
unbootable system (forgotten grub-install error?)
--
grub-installer fails to install on a raid1 array
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527401
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Another ugly thing: fdisk -l complains /dev/mdX does not contain a
valid partition table (see the attachment) about partitions created by
partman. The system is nevertheless operational.
** Attachment added: fdisk -l output
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44699156/err-1.txt
--
grub-installer
The server still does not reboot, saying a few times:
init: unreadahed-other main process (number) terminated with status 4
and freezing
Faulty everywhere...
--
grub-installer fails to install on a raid1 array
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527401
You received this bug notification because
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
