Il giorno mar, 13/01/2009 alle 12.51 +1100, Christopher Halse Rogers ha
scritto:
There's no
indication at this stage as to whether it'll be supported in
Launchpad; obviously, a decision on that would require a working
plugin before it could be meaningful - you'd need to know the
hi,
Am Dienstag, den 13.01.2009, 10:22 +0530 schrieb Vishal Rao:
Hello,
I'd filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312098 a while back about
this build failure.
So far there's just an automated comment to post output of lspci and
Xorg.0.log etc but
I'm not sure it's relevant and if a
Am 13.01.2009 um 00:37 schrieb Joseph Smidt:
As you all know there has been tremendous discussion over Git vs.
Bazaar recently.
Has been? Actually, I didn't notice this discussion yet and while I
touched a lot of FOSS projects recently, not a single one uses
Bazaar. Even when working
Greetings..
I'm one of the testers for 9.04 was awaiting the patched grub to start
testing ext4. I have converted my main OS over have tried to boot grub
from a ext4 partition...problem is that I just end up in a grub prompt.
If I create a ext3 bootable, there is no problem...
My question
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 07:18:12AM -0800, Dean Loros wrote:
I'm one of the testers for 9.04 was awaiting the patched grub to start
testing ext4. I have converted my main OS over have tried to boot grub
from a ext4 partition...problem is that I just end up in a grub prompt.
If I create a
What reasons are against moving from sysklogd to a modern syslog
daemon, such as the excellent syslog-ng?
It runs as a single process (vs multiple ones in sysklogd), has lower
RSS use, has smarter disk flushing, and has some really practical
features, such as allowing remote logging to per-host
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:23:02PM +, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
What reasons are against moving from sysklogd to a modern syslog
daemon, such as the excellent syslog-ng?
There has been some discussion about moving to rsyslog rather than
syslog-ng. See the sysklogd-to-rsyslog specification
What are the relative merits of rsyslog versus syslog-ng?
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 15:33 -0500, Mathias Gug wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:23:02PM +, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
What reasons are against moving from sysklogd to a modern syslog
daemon, such as the excellent syslog-ng?
