On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:45:16PM +, (``-_-) -- Fernando wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 07 February 2008 19:11:26 Bryce Harrington wrote:
Alright, I think I can modify displayconfig-gtk when in BPX mode to not
offer to set up multi-head (which
Hi Nicolas,
This sounds like a great idea, let us know if you get strong interest
from students to participate, I'd be happy to mentor for Xorg oriented
tasks.
Bryce
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:17:28PM +0200, Nicolas Deschildre wrote:
Hi!
[You are receiving this mail because either you are
Btw, I've itemized a few ideas for some Ubunt-X projects here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Projects
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:29:45PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
This sounds like a great idea, let us know if you get strong interest
from students to participate, I'd be happy
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 02:22:57PM +0200, Przemys??aw Kulczycki wrote:
Hi!
AFAIK, in Hardy the new display configuration tool doesn't allow to
choose a driver for your graphics card.
The new Screen Resolution tool does graphics changes dynamically via
Xrandr, without modifying the xorg.conf.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:20:17PM -0700, Ted Gould wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 19:02 +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
unlikely since it requires SHMConfig enabled by default in xorg which we
wont do by default since it rips open quite a security hole (everyone,
even remotely logged in people
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 08:57:36PM +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
A friend of mine was upgrading to Hardy, and (so far as we can tell)
there was a power cut while it was halfway through, which left his
system in a not-especially-useful state. I think the best solution is
to have a
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:58:12AM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
I've noticed that Ubuntu's boot speed seems to have taken a fall in
Hardy. Anecdotally I believe that Gutsy was the fastest but from a
viewable stats perspective the fall can be seen in Feisty versus Hardy
on
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 11:59:30PM +0200, Przemys??aw Kulczycki wrote:
Hi!
I have a suggestion for development of Intrepid Ibex.
The Ubuntu's blueprints page currently lists over 2000 specs.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu
Some of them are implemented, but not marked as such.
Some of
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 06:26:38PM +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
Il giorno gio, 10/04/2008 alle 13.59 -0700, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/137234
because it always worked before gutsy, and it is a pity that when I
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:11:05PM +0800, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Bryce Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It could perhaps make things even easier for developers, but thats
another kettle of fish.
I'd be interested in hearing your further thoughts
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 01:29:29PM +0200, Thomas Novin wrote:
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 14:00 +0200, Przemysław Kulczycki wrote:
One of the often accusations against Ubuntu is that it only takes from
other projects (Debian, Red Hat, Novell/Suse...) and doesn't give back
anything. Ubuntu
Known issue - please see bugs #185311 and #87947.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:25:21AM +0200, Brahim LARCHET wrote:
hello
i get a bugg
on ubuntu the lastest ubuntu with openoffice
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ oowriter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Locking assertion failure.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 05:07:05PM +1000, Christopher Halse Rogers wrote:
On 6/25/08, Markus Hitter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
probably some of you already read that statement of kernel developers
about the opening of graphics drivers: https://
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:25:40AM +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
Setting up an automatic install / upgrade / remove / purge tester
would be good, perhaps using piuparts or similar infrastructure,
although this requires considerable resources in terms of local
storage
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:52:44PM +0300, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
2008/7/7 Emmet Hikory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
While we all tend to be busy much of the time, perhaps there are ways
that we can improve the view of bugs in need of attention, or
otherwise help understand which bugs are likely to be
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:04:14PM +0100, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Stability in software
Why is it that 8.04 “LTS” has such a wave of new features and new
versions of software that have not been time-tested to be stable? LTS
releases (meant to be exceptionally stable) should not have so many
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:14:59PM +0100, Alexander Jones wrote:
2008/7/7 Bryce Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Frequently upstream decides $TECH is too horribly broken, so they create
$TECH+1 which is often a from-scratch rewrite, which often means trading
one set of bugs for another
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 02:28:58PM +0300, Steve Goodman wrote:
I just got a new computer and wanted to try Ubuntu 8.04 on it. It was very
easy to install and I got up and running pretty quickly.
Welcome to Ubuntu. :-)
So here's my request: The partitioning wizard that I was presented with
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:07:59AM +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
Bryce Harrington wrote on 07/07/08 21:55:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:52:44PM +0300, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
I'm not sure if it is even possible to sort bugs by the amount of
duplicates?
Yes it is; in fact I have a script
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:16:04AM +0100, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 12:10:45PM +0300, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
If you were unaware that this was going on, perhaps we could do a better
job
of communicating this type of effort with the
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:24:00PM -0400, Chris wrote:
Timo Aaltonen wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, Chris wrote:
Hello, during the package build of xserver-xorg-core it does not
--enable-record=yes. I think it should, right? The default
disables it.
True, xorg-server 1.5 does not
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 03:46:20PM -0400, Chris wrote:
Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:24:00PM -0400, Chris wrote:
Hi,
I'm a developer and require it for my own software. I went into the
package and enabled it rebuilt for the time being.
Isn't there some software
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:52:25AM +0100, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
== Filesystem checking / AutoFsck ==
A suggestion was made to the technical board that Ubuntu could be smarter
about how and when it performs filesystem integrity checks (fsck).
Decision: This should be discussed more widely
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:15:05AM +0100, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 02:09:19PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:52:25AM +0100, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
== Filesystem checking / AutoFsck ==
A suggestion was made to the technical board
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:20:38AM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Also, it seems to me that if you tell someone their bug is invalid
that doesn't inspire them to come back with more information or send
more bugs in the future. On the other hand, if you mark the bug as
need help or similar, then
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 02:40:11PM -0500, Nehemiah Dacres wrote:
will git-core 1.6 be available in hardy Hedron repositories soon or will we
have to wait till intrepid Ibex because this is a LTS release?
Hardy is updated only to fix bugs, not bring in new packages. At your
option you can add
Hi Travis,
Sounds like you're looking for the keyboard troubleshooting section of
the wiki:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Troubleshooting#Problem involves missing support for
some keyboard keys
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 05:17:41AM +1000, Travis Place wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, im not on the
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:32:20PM +0200, Wouter Stomp wrote:
Hello,
Bugs that are marked incomplete and subsequently get a reply from the
original reporter often stay in the incomplete status. This means they
automatically get closed even though the needed info was provided. I
think it
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 01:54:21AM +0200, Wouter Stomp wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Bryce Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, afaik automatic-expiration is not enabled for Ubuntu. It tracks
when bugs will expire but doesn't close them without human action.
Ok, so what
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 08:04:43AM +0100, Chris Coulson wrote:
Unfortunately, some triagers do just close bugs when they are marked ready
to expire, without actually checking whether the reporter provided the
requested information. I have re-opened one such report recently, although I
don't
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 08:31:33PM +0200, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote:
Hi
Some systems have been really successful at making it *appear* as if the
system starts up faster. In my opinion, where the system can't be made
to boot faster, it should be made to appear so.
We're right on
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:01:49AM +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote on 09/09/08 19:31:
...
1. Attempt to get an X server up much sooner
...
See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OneSecondX.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:00:39AM +0100, (``-_-) -- Fernando wrote:
Ol?? Colin e a todos.
On Thursday 11 September 2008 14:23:36 Colin Watson wrote:
* lose two hours of work to the wiki deciding not to accept my new page,
my browser not saving my form contents, and me not thinking
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 08:23:34PM +0200, Lo?c Martin wrote:
Lo?c Martin a ?crit :
Bryce Harrington a ?crit :
Btw, you can also report X bugs more easily now by running this command:
ubuntu-bug xorg
This will automatically gather all the necessary troubleshooting files,
launch
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 09:05:54PM +0200, Lo?c Martin wrote:
Thanks. With Xorg.0.log I managed to troubleshot the problem - seems
like the LiveCD can't run with 2 monitors plugged on an Nvidia card,
even when one of the two isn't on. Since my Cintiq was disconnected, and
the control box
This is not the right place to report bugs. Please use launchpad.
Also, when reporting bugs, please find and follow the bug guidelines for
the thing you're reporting bugs against. For the linux kernel,
guidelines are at:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeamBugPolicies
More info on debugging
You should use launchpad to report bugs, not this mailing list.
For more guidance on how to report bugs, please see:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs
Bryce
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:09:59AM +0300, Viacheslav Chumushuk wrote:
Hello.
I think You have bug at ubuntu's
If you have a patch from upstream that you can confirm fixes the issue,
I can take a look, but otherwise you're a bit too late for intrepid
which is already into RC freeze.
You're right that there's lots of -nv bugs; I've upstreamed several in
recent weeks but they seem not to get attention
Hi Dan,
Would you mind going ahead and sketching this documentation in?
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Config/Input
Bryce
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 12:21:45AM -0500, Dan Colish wrote:
I think there should be a link placed in the xorg document when
update-manager comments out an input device to the
on the subject.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=948154
Dan
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Bryce Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi Dan,
Would you mind going ahead and sketching this documentation in?
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Config/Input
Bryce
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 03:58:51PM +0100, mr wrote:
Hi,
According to the recent benchmarking article by Phoronix, the previous two
releases of Ubuntu are significantly slower than Feisty Fawn. In some cases
this can be seen as up to 50% performance drop with certain desktop tasks.
I can
Whoops, I thought you were talking about the recent article about -intel
performance on x45 chips. But I see you're actually talking about an
earlier article about Ubuntu performance in general:
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=13022
Note that in that article they looked only at the
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 05:47:38PM +0100, Lo?c Martin wrote:
2) update the linux wacom driver to the latest (even beta) release.
I think it's already the case, Intrepid use the beta driver 0.8.1.4, and
Jaunty uses the 0.8.1.6. 0.8.1.4 has a bug that severly affect some
users (input freeze
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:13:25AM +, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
John McCabe-Dansted ha scritto:
OTOH hand this means that the drivers together cover more than 85%.
Would it perhaps be worth making both drivers easily available on the
same kernel?
I guess ideally we would scan the
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 09:50:22PM +, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
Regarding -i810, indeed there are a few remaining corner cases where
there are issues (mostly with old 8xx-era chips that Intel provides only
limited support for), and I've discussed a lot of these with Intel. But
I can't
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 08:13:52PM -0500, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 17:05 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
However, I am beginning to think that all the cases I know are i945 -
execpt for the aforementioned old laptop about which - frankly - I don't
care at all
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:14:34PM +, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
I have done all my best for that bug - sometimes really struggling to
gather debug information in time before e.g. sending the laptop out. As
soon as I have a monitor at hand I will keep on. But my laptop is not
the only
Ever wondered why your pipe-A underruns and your EQ overflows? These
and other cryptic X.org error terms now have a handy glossary available
from the Ubuntu-X wiki, put together with Jesse Barnes' help for all you
bug triagers:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Glossary
See you for Hug Day Thursday!
48 matches
Mail list logo