On 06/27/2011 12:44 PM, David Henningsson wrote:
On 2011-06-26 10:04, rosea grammostola wrote:
In Fedora pulseaudio is pulled in as a dependency of gnome-shell.
...and in Ubuntu it's a dependency on ubuntu-desktop, so no difference
there.
There might be a small difference, but it isn't the
On 2011-06-27 13:44, rosea grammostola wrote:
On 06/27/2011 12:44 PM, David Henningsson wrote:
On 2011-06-26 10:04, rosea grammostola wrote:
In Fedora pulseaudio is pulled in as a dependency of gnome-shell.
...and in Ubuntu it's a dependency on ubuntu-desktop, so no difference
there.
There
On 06/27/2011 03:30 PM, David Henningsson wrote:
On 2011-06-27 13:44, rosea grammostola wrote:
On 06/27/2011 12:44 PM, David Henningsson wrote:
On 2011-06-26 10:04, rosea grammostola wrote:
In Fedora pulseaudio is pulled in as a dependency of gnome-shell.
...and in Ubuntu it's a dependency
On 06/25/2011 01:40 PM, rosea grammostola wrote:
On 06/25/2011 01:04 PM, rosea grammostola wrote:
On 06/25/2011 12:45 PM, Tony Atkinson wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 12:21 +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Ah I like constructive replies.
I should provide you a little background info maybe.
Hi,
On 06/24/2011 07:08 PM, David Henningsson wrote:
On 2011-06-24 13:26, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 06/24/2011 01:08 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
A group of (professional) Linuxaudio users prefer to have a system
without Pulseaudio. How nice Pulseaudio can be for 'consumer audio', it
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 12:21 +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Ah I like constructive replies.
I should provide you a little background info maybe. Since years
64Studio is the most known company when it comes to the delivering of
(community) distros (and OEM products) optimized for multimedia
On 06/25/2011 01:04 PM, rosea grammostola wrote:
On 06/25/2011 12:45 PM, Tony Atkinson wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 12:21 +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Ah I like constructive replies.
I should provide you a little background info maybe. Since years
64Studio is the most known company when it
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 4:21 AM, rosea.grammostola
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Fedora, OpenSuse and Debian etc. aren't building their distro especially
for this group.
Not being involved with Fedora or openSUSE closely, I can't comment on
them, but Debian doesn't ship a desktop
Hi,
A group of (professional) Linuxaudio users prefer to have a system
without Pulseaudio. How nice Pulseaudio can be for 'consumer audio', it
can be a pain on a professional audio system. That's why some people
prefer to stick with just ALSA and JACK. On most systems this is not a
problem
On 06/24/2011 01:08 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
A group of (professional) Linuxaudio users prefer to have a system
without Pulseaudio. How nice Pulseaudio can be for 'consumer audio', it
can be a pain on a professional audio system. That's why some people
prefer to stick with just ALSA and
Hi,
On Jun 24, 2011 7:10 AM, rosea.grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
A group of (professional) Linuxaudio users prefer to have a system without
Pulseaudio. How nice Pulseaudio can be for 'consumer audio', it can be a
pain on a professional audio system. That's why some people
On 2011-06-24 13:26, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 06/24/2011 01:08 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
A group of (professional) Linuxaudio users prefer to have a system
without Pulseaudio. How nice Pulseaudio can be for 'consumer audio', it
can be a pain on a professional audio system.
Whenever
I can only speak for myself as I am not a Ubuntu Developer by any means. But
let me point out that Ubuntu is not Debian and Debian is not Ubuntu. If
you're happy with the way Debian handles Pulseaudio, then use Debian
instead.
And besides, there's nothing stopping you from using ALSA, OSS, JACK or
13 matches
Mail list logo
