On Sat, 2009-12-26 at 16:20 +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
I'm still a little shocked that F-Spot is still included by default. Any
software developer or any geek with a basic understanding of software
development and programming knows that F-Spot is one of the worst
examples of programming
On Sat, 2009-12-26 at 12:00 +, Chris Jones wrote:
I'm a photographic imaging professional and I use too many imaging apps
to list here, but F-Spot is not one of them, for the simple reason it is
slow, clunky and has crap file format support for anything outside of
JPEG format.
The
The Ubuntu Developers clearly have no understanding of this sector of
technology and the IT industry and that sector being
digital/photographic imaging. And if they did, they would ditch F-Spot
and replace it with a suitable and real image management package.
First of all, I think you are
On Sat, 2009-12-26 at 10:11 +, Mohammed Bassit wrote:
I'd really love to know more about the alternatives that have been
mentioned a 100 times if you don't mind. I can't find any personally.Not
that I like F-Spot, but I can't see much of an alternative.
Cheers,
Mohammed Bassit
I'm still a little shocked that F-Spot is still included by default. Any
software developer or any geek with a basic understanding of software
development and programming knows that F-Spot is one of the worst
examples of programming code/platform. To put it simply, it's shocking
and to be honest I
Solang, Shotwell, and F-Spot are all fine image managers/organizers,
but the current plan is to work on F-Spot to get it to meet the
following needs:
* Quickly viewing images by folder [currently handled by EOG]
* Solang and F-Spot both have view-modes but still
Le lundi 07 décembre 2009 à 21:24 -0500, Danny Piccirillo a écrit :
Before too much effort is invested into making F-Spot good enough to
meet all of the needs outlined at the UDS Default App Selection
session, i thought i should bring up Solang and Shotwell to see if it
might be worth
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Did anybody looked at how those other software handle exporting to
flick, picasa or other web services?
For Shotwell uploading to Flickr and Facebook is planned for 0.4 which
is to be released in December. Picasa is
The bizarrely obnoxious bit about F-Spot import is that it copies everything
to your photos folder BEFORE you actually accept the import. Then, if you
don't accept it, it deletes them... which is just Bad Behavior.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Le
Actually, it seems to start importing as soon as you select a folder... then
the dialog remains locked until it reads all the files in it.
2009/12/8 caleb.marcus+u-d-d
caleb.marcus+u-...@gmail.comcaleb.marcus%2bu-...@gmail.com
The bizarrely obnoxious bit about F-Spot import is that it copies
Before too much effort is invested into making F-Spot good enough to meet
all of the needs outlined at the UDS Default App Selection session, i
thought i should bring up
Solanghttp://santanu-sinha.blogspot.com/2009/06/solang.htmland
Shotwell http://www.yorba.org/shotwell/ to see if it might be
11 matches
Mail list logo
