On May 27, 2015 11:10:53 AM GMT+02:00, Sheng Yong shengyo...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi,
I encountered a problem when I test thread local storage
on my arm board (kernel 3.10.77 and uclibc 0.99.3.2).
That version dies not sound familiar. I suggest you ask whoever provided this
release. Alternatively
Hi,
I encountered a problem when I test thread local storage
on my arm board (kernel 3.10.77 and uclibc 0.99.3.2).
Please let me know if I am doing something wrong for
debugging TLS.
on my x86 host machine:
root@kernel-host:~ cat tls.c
__thread int i =5;
int
main (int argc, char **argv)
{
Hi,
Sheng Yong wrote,
Hi,
I encountered a problem when I test thread local storage
on my arm board (kernel 3.10.77 and uclibc 0.99.3.2).
Please let me know if I am doing something wrong for
debugging TLS.
You mean 0.9.33.2?
Sure it has NPTL/TLS support, but it depends if it is
Hi,
On 5/27/2015 6:08 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On May 27, 2015 11:10:53 AM GMT+02:00, Sheng Yong shengyo...@huawei.com
wrote:
Hi,
I encountered a problem when I test thread local storage
on my arm board (kernel 3.10.77 and uclibc 0.99.3.2).
That version dies not sound
Hi,
On 5/28/2015 3:18 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:10:53PM +0800, Sheng Yong wrote:
Hi,
I encountered a problem when I test thread local storage
on my arm board (kernel 3.10.77 and uclibc 0.99.3.2).
Please let me know if I am doing something wrong for
debugging TLS.
Hi, folks
My test environment is GCC (4.7.1), GDB (7.6) and uclibc (0.9.33.2 commit
ff22cca4).
The testcase is:
$ cat long_long_simple.c
#include stdio.h
int main()
{
long long val = 01234567123456701234567LL; /* 21+ octal digits
*/
On May 27, 2015, at 6:21 PM, Sheng Yong shengyo...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi,
On 5/28/2015 3:18 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:10:53PM +0800, Sheng Yong wrote:
Hi,
I encountered a problem when I test thread local storage
on my arm board (kernel 3.10.77 and uclibc