Errors building arm binutils under uClibc.

2008-10-06 Thread Rob Landley
So as a second level smoke test, I tried to build binutils 2.17 under a uClibc system made from the 10/04 snapshot, and arm died with: /home/firmware/firmware-224a724868f3/build/temp-i586/binutils/libiberty/strsignal.c:553: error: conflicting types for 'psignal'

Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 03:35:50AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: For what it's worth, using the linuxthreads.old stuff, the 10/04 nightly Unfortunately i have _no_ idea what revision that would be. snapshot built for armv4l, armv5l, i586, i686, x86-64, m68k, mips, mipsel, sh4, powerpc, and sparc.

Re: fenv.h missing, gcc-4.3.1 issue

2008-10-06 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 11:44:42PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On (27/08/08 11:17), Kevin Day wrote: gcc-4.3.1 seems to need fenv.h, or more specifically information from within bits/fenv.h. This is not really accurate, libbid needs it. Thats it, GCC-4.3.1 now continues to compile past: FE_INEXACT

RE: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernhard Reutner-Fischer Sent: den 6 oktober 2008 10:24 To: Rob Landley Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org Subject: Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material. On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 03:35:50AM -0500, Rob Landley

Re: SH2aeb support

2008-10-06 Thread Kieran Bingham
Hi Carmelo. Thanks for the hint, Yes SVN:Trunk does solve the memcpy build issue it would seem. I have another issue I've not been able to figure out correctly. With Support global constructors and destructors turned off, uClibc doesn't seem to build crti.o and crtn.o, yet the linker still looks

Re: pthreads stress test hangs on read() returning EINTR

2008-10-06 Thread Fathi Boudra
Hi, ping. Any comments from people who care about thread ? As a reminder: - http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=4994 - http://uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2008-March/019187.html It could be nice to take a look before 0.9.30 release. cheers, Fathi ___

Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:02:40PM +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: And do not forget to actually tag the release in the repository... The release will be tagged and will be copied to a new stable branch, yes. ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org

Re: [PATCH] posix_fadvise for ppc32

2008-10-06 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 08:15:40AM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Corinna Schultz wrote: These changes are based on the glibc code that handles ppc32. This probably shouldn't be in the common dir, but I am unfamiliar with how to add code into the arch-specific dir. I am also unsure about the

RE: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
-Original Message- From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 6 oktober 2008 14:13 To: Peter Kjellerstedt Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org Subject: Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material. On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:02:40PM +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: And do not

Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:22:32PM +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: Not sure if I made myself clear, but I was meaning tagging -rc2 (i.e., just like the old tag tags/uClibc_0_9_29_rc1 for 0.9.29rc1). what for? trunk is in kind of bugfix-only mode ATM and the rc's are extremely short lived.

Re: SH2aeb support

2008-10-06 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
Kieran Bingham wrote: Hi Carmelo. Thanks for the hint, Yes SVN:Trunk does solve the memcpy build issue it would seem. fine. I have another issue I've not been able to figure out correctly. With Support global constructors and destructors turned off, uClibc doesn't seem to build crti.o

Re: SH2aeb support

2008-10-06 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 03:01:15PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: I'm not so aware of not elf format... if I guess correctly sh2a doesn't use elf format (as from -Wl,-elf2flt). sh-elf would build fine, not sure why you are ( or trying to) use elf2flat? If __UCLIBC_FORMAT_SHARED_FLAT__ is not

Re: SH2aeb support

2008-10-06 Thread Kieran Bingham
2008/10/6 Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] Which is the target file format used to build uclibc. I'm not so aware of not elf format... if I guess correctly sh2a doesn't use elf format (as from -Wl,-elf2flt). indeed UCLIBC_FORMAT_FLAT=y If I build with Support global constructors and

Re: SH2aeb support

2008-10-06 Thread Kieran Bingham
Hi Bernhard, 2008/10/6 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 03:01:15PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: I'm not so aware of not elf format... if I guess correctly sh2a doesn't use elf format (as from -Wl,-elf2flt). sh-elf would build fine, not sure why you are (

Re: SH2aeb support

2008-10-06 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:26:24PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote: Hi Bernhard, 2008/10/6 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 03:01:15PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: I'm not so aware of not elf format... if I guess correctly sh2a doesn't use elf format (as from

Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 06 October 2008 03:24:19 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 03:35:50AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: For what it's worth, using the linuxthreads.old stuff, the 10/04 nightly Unfortunately i have _no_ idea what revision that would be. Each snapshot contains all the

Re: pthreads stress test hangs on read() returning EINTR

2008-10-06 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 06 October 2008 05:04:20 Fathi Boudra wrote: Hi, ping. Any comments from people who care about thread ? As a reminder: - http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=4994 - http://uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2008-March/019187.html It could be nice to take a look before 0.9.30 release.

Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.

2008-10-06 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 06 October 2008 07:12:34 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:02:40PM +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: And do not forget to actually tag the release in the repository... The release will be tagged and will be copied to a new stable branch, yes. Just FYI, I