At 10:58 -0700 2003-08-11, Peter Kirk wrote:
On 11/08/2003 06:59, Jon Hanna wrote:
There are only two theoretical problems that I can see here, the first is
that a whitespace character other than space gets converted to space by
attribute value normalisation, and that this changes the meaning of
Elaine Keown
TEMPORARILY in Madison Wisconsin
Hello:
I am posting this to both regular Unicode and
the new Hebrew list. Please reply off-list or
to the Hebrew list if you want me to see what
you wrote immediately.
I am responding at great length to the Roadmap proposals
for the
On 05/08/2003 17:13, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
Peter Kirk said:
From what Ken says, it sounds like it will be wrong from whenever
Unicode 4.0 is officially issued
Actually Unicode 4.0 was officially issued on April 17, 2003.
What we are waiting on now is for the publication of the text
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 3:53 PM, Peter Kirk wrote:
This answer presupposes that there is a well-defined concept of which
base character a combining mark belongs to. That is not always true.
The particukar combining mark which precipitated the debate may be
situated above the gap
At 18:03 -0400 2003-08-07, Karljürgen Feuerherm wrote:
My knowledge of Aramaic script is a little scanty, but my understanding is
more or less the same as Peter's. Which leads me
to suggest that encoding Aramaic separately
would be a bit like encoding Old Akkadian
(Cuneiform) separately from
Hello,
Thank you all for your answers to my questions on the above topic. They will give me
the lead to begin working on my little project. I will get back to you if I get stuck
along the way.
kyekyeku
-Original Message-
From: ext Peter Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
6 matches
Mail list logo
