Le 13/01/2016 22:39, Garth Wallace a écrit :
The rationale for U+1B001, AIUI, was that it was used in some modern
scholarly works about the history of the Japanese language to
distinguish between/e/ and/je/ before they merged in the modern
language. I don't know if historically that
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:55 AM, suzuki toshiya
wrote:
> Garth Wallace wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:56 AM, suzuki toshiya
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm not a representative of the experts working for the
>>> proposal from Japan NB, but
Garth Wallace wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:56 AM, suzuki toshiya
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm not a representative of the experts working for the
>> proposal from Japan NB, but I could explain something.
>>
>> 1) "They never took that out?" I'm not sure who you mean
Hi,
I'm not a representative of the experts working for the
proposal from Japan NB, but I could explain something.
1) "They never took that out?" I'm not sure who you mean
"they" (UTC? JNB?), but it seems that no official document
asking for the response from JNB is submitted in WG2.
If UTC
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:56 AM, suzuki toshiya
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not a representative of the experts working for the
> proposal from Japan NB, but I could explain something.
>
> 1) "They never took that out?" I'm not sure who you mean
> "they" (UTC? JNB?), but it
5 matches
Mail list logo