Re: [Unicode] Re: HENTAIGANA LETTER E-1

2016-01-14 Thread Frédéric Grosshans
Le 13/01/2016 22:39, Garth Wallace a écrit : The rationale for U+1B001, AIUI, was that it was used in some modern scholarly works about the history of the Japanese language to distinguish between/e/ and/je/ before they merged in the modern language. I don't know if historically that

Re: [Unicode] Re: HENTAIGANA LETTER E-1

2016-01-13 Thread Garth Wallace
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:55 AM, suzuki toshiya wrote: > Garth Wallace wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:56 AM, suzuki toshiya >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm not a representative of the experts working for the >>> proposal from Japan NB, but

Re: [Unicode] Re: HENTAIGANA LETTER E-1

2016-01-08 Thread suzuki toshiya
Garth Wallace wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:56 AM, suzuki toshiya > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm not a representative of the experts working for the >> proposal from Japan NB, but I could explain something. >> >> 1) "They never took that out?" I'm not sure who you mean

Re: [Unicode] Re: HENTAIGANA LETTER E-1

2016-01-07 Thread suzuki toshiya
Hi, I'm not a representative of the experts working for the proposal from Japan NB, but I could explain something. 1) "They never took that out?" I'm not sure who you mean "they" (UTC? JNB?), but it seems that no official document asking for the response from JNB is submitted in WG2. If UTC

Re: [Unicode] Re: HENTAIGANA LETTER E-1

2016-01-07 Thread Garth Wallace
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:56 AM, suzuki toshiya wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not a representative of the experts working for the > proposal from Japan NB, but I could explain something. > > 1) "They never took that out?" I'm not sure who you mean > "they" (UTC? JNB?), but it