Alastair, thanks for finding it and bringing it up. I think you're right
that the problem is in that the test generation code doesn't properly apply
the bidi criteria to *all* the labels if *any* of the labels are RTL, but
instead is probably just going on a label-by-label basis. Thankfully, it
On 4 Jan 2017, at 23:40, Markus Scherer wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Alastair Houghton
> wrote:
> RFC 5893 seems pretty clear to me, and the problem really is that the test
> vectors (which come from unicode.org) seem (to me)
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Alastair Houghton <
alast...@alastairs-place.net> wrote:
> RFC 5893 seems pretty clear to me, and the problem really is that the test
> vectors (which come from unicode.org) seem (to me) to be incorrect.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5893#section-2 says "*The
On 4 Jan 2017, at 08:12, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
>
> Hello Alastair,
>
> On 2016/12/06 20:51, Alastair Houghton wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I must be missing something; in IdnaTest.txt, in the BIDI TESTS section,
>> there are examples like (line 74)
>
> Can you tell us
Hello Alastair,
On 2016/12/06 20:51, Alastair Houghton wrote:
Hi all,
I must be missing something; in IdnaTest.txt, in the BIDI TESTS section, there
are examples like (line 74)
Can you tell us where you got IdnaTest.txt from?
B;0à.\u05D0; ; xn--0-sfa.xn--4db #
Hi all,
I must be missing something; in IdnaTest.txt, in the BIDI TESTS section, there
are examples like (line 74)
B;0à.\u05D0; ; xn--0-sfa.xn--4db # 0à.א
which the file alleges are valid, but I cannot for the life of me see why.
First, “0à.א” is clearly a “Bidi
6 matches
Mail list logo