Quasiquotation marks

2014-06-10 Thread Frédéric Grosshans
This week’s shady character introduces quasiquotation marks, used in fanzines since at least 1944 for “in substance” quaotation. This mark is the superposition of (or ') with -. http://www.shadycharacters.co.uk/2014/06/miscellany-49-quasiquote/ This looks like a good candidate for unicode

Re: Quasiquotation marks

2014-06-10 Thread Gerrit Ansmann
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:51:44 +0200, Frédéric Grosshans frederic.grossh...@gmail.com wrote: This week’s shady character introduces quasiquotation marks, used in fanzines since at least 1944 for “in substance” quaotation. This mark is the superposition of (or ') with -. http

Re: Quasiquotation marks

2014-06-10 Thread Philippe Verdy
a part of it that has a standard text meaning, even if its contextual usage is different and carries additional semantics with these styles. 2014-06-10 13:51 GMT+02:00 Frédéric Grosshans frederic.grossh...@gmail.com : This week’s shady character introduces quasiquotation marks, used in fanzines

Re: Quasiquotation marks

2014-06-10 Thread Leonardo Boiko
What about using U+0331 combining macron below or U+0320 combining minus below? Here are some samples: U+0331 ̱tesṯ “̱test”̱ U+0320 ̠test̠ “̠test”̠ 2014-06-10 9:39 GMT-03:00 Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr: (overstriking with del or s in HTML) Modern HTML phased out s, and del has

Re: Quasiquotation marks

2014-06-10 Thread Philippe Verdy
2014-06-10 15:33 GMT+02:00 Leonardo Boiko leobo...@namakajiri.net: What about using U+0331 combining macron below or U+0320 combining minus below? Here are some samples: U+0331 ̱tesṯ “̱test”̱ U+0320 ̠test̠ “̠test”̠ 2014-06-10 9:39 GMT-03:00 Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr:

Re: Quasiquotation marks

2014-06-10 Thread Frédéric Grosshans
Le 10/06/2014 15:33, Leonardo Boiko a écrit : What about using U+0331 combining macron below or U+0320 combining minus below? That would more similar to the underline hack discussed briefly here : http://fanac.org/Fannish_Reference_Works/Fan_terms/Fan_terms-07.html But I think it’s the wrong