At 02:16 AM 9/20/00 -0800, Otto Stolz wrote:
Not exactly chanting, I once have written a Pascal program in verse
and rhyme. A colleague had asked for a missing subroutine in verse,
so I supplied one in the same style.
(I'd better had written: "once upon a time"; cf. infra.)
Am 2001-02-08 um
In the proposal for better accommodating UCS in SQL, we assumed that a
comparison performed according to UTR#10, "Unicode Technical Standard #10
Unicode Collation Algorithm", would require four parameters, viz.
Two strings to be compared
A collation element table
A maximum level as
I got a reference to the following from ACM TechNews - Wednesday, February
7, 2001, so some may have seen it already.
http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/article.html?id=010207001454
It shows a degree of ignorance that I would hardly have believed possible in
a reputable newspaper. I know
At 04:48 -0800 2001-02-08, J M Sykes quoted the FT:
The International Standards Organisation (ISO) has now agreed to give
standard meanings to these remaining codes.
Which as everyone knows, is really the International Organization for
Standardization (ISO).
Sigh.
--
Michael Everson **
Mike Sykes wrote:
http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/article.html?id=010207001454
It shows a degree of ignorance that I would hardly have believed
possible in a reputable newspaper.
"Technical" and "scientific" articles on most "reputable" newspapers are
often of that quality.
What
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Michael Everson wrote:
At 04:48 -0800 2001-02-08, J M Sykes quoted the FT:
The International Standards Organisation (ISO) has now agreed to give
standard meanings to these remaining codes.
Which as everyone knows, is really the International Organization for
Pehaps he meant http://www.worldnames.net/ ?
I was unable to find www.worldnames.com which he cites.
When an standard conformaing SQL-implementation concatenates two normalized
UCS strings, then it is required that the result be normalized (noting
Unicode Standard Annex #15 Unicode Normalization Forms, Concatenation).
My question is, supposing the NF of the two operands to be different, what
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Everson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Unicode List" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: Article in Financial Times; Feb 7, 2001
At 04:48 -0800 2001-02-08, J M Sykes quoted the FT:
The International Standards
I'm afraid you have the wrong bloke here, Maurice. The technicality of my
query may have ffoled you into thinking I'm a UTR#10 expert - far from it!
All I can do is cc your query to the Unicode list - and wish you luck,
naturally :-)
Mike.
- Original Message -
From: "Maurice Bauhahn"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 8:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: conversion of e-mail addresses
I have floppy disk with addresses from another computer's e-mail (I was
using the Microsoft e-mail system at
(Assume that whatever script you want to display is displayable if you were
to use a legacy encoding. I.e., assume that if you want to send Japanese
text in UTF-8, that the Mac is either a Japanese Mac or is using the JDK, so
displaying shift_JIS pages would work. I'm trying to determine what
Rob Tonus wrote:
I have floppy disk with addresses from another computer's
e-mail (I was
using the Microsoft e-mail system at the time).
I want to drop the e-mail addresses I have in a WAB file into
my current
Lotus Notes e-mail program, but I've been told to convert it
to unicode
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 10:26:02AM -0800, Marco Cimarosti wrote:
Someone pointed me to this just a few days ago:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/asrecod/
Unluckily, the instructions are in Russian.
Why would you point to this converter? Assuming this is for Unix only,
(which is true as
On 02/08/2001 11:20:27 AM "J M Sykes" wrote:
When an standard conformaing SQL-implementation concatenates two
normalized
UCS strings, then it is required that the result be normalized (noting
Unicode Standard Annex #15 Unicode Normalization Forms, Concatenation).
Yes. It must be understood
Some of the special casing rules are not clear.
# FINAL: The letter is not followed by a letter of category L* (e.g. Ll,
Lt, Lu, Lm, or Lo).
What happens if the word with the final sigma is followed by a period or
comma etc. It should be final. But what about a hyphenated word?
Technically
16 matches
Mail list logo
