Re: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FFFD generation when decoding ill-formed UTF-8

2017-05-24 Thread Markus Scherer via Unicode
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Karl Williamson wrote: > On 05/24/2017 12:46 AM, Martin J. Dürst wrote: > >> That's wrong. There was a public review issue with various options and >> with feedback, and the recommendation has been implemented and in use >> widely (among

Re: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FFFD generation when decoding ill-formed UTF-8

2017-05-24 Thread Karl Williamson via Unicode
On 05/24/2017 12:46 AM, Martin J. Dürst wrote: On 2017/05/24 05:57, Karl Williamson via Unicode wrote: On 05/23/2017 12:20 PM, Asmus Freytag (c) via Unicode wrote: Adding a "recommendation" this late in the game is just bad standards policy. Unless I misunderstand, you are missing the

Re: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FFFD generation when decoding ill-formed UTF-8

2017-05-24 Thread Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
On 2017/05/24 05:57, Karl Williamson via Unicode wrote: On 05/23/2017 12:20 PM, Asmus Freytag (c) via Unicode wrote: Adding a "recommendation" this late in the game is just bad standards policy. Unless I misunderstand, you are missing the point. There is already a recommendation listed in