Hello,
When I type unicode 0644 then unicode 064E then unicode 0627
I obtain لَا
on my web pages
That is (Ligature LAM-ALIF) plus (ALIF)
That's bad.
What should I do to avoid this ? Thanks in advance
Escape Landsome wrote:
When I type unicode 0644 then unicode 064E then unicode 0627
I obtain لَا
on my web pages
That is (Ligature LAM-ALIF) plus (ALIF)
On my system this looks like (Ligature LAM-ALIF) plus (FATHA), which is
what one might expect. This is running BabelPad 6.0 on Windows 7,
- the operating system, including version
Linux version 3.0.0-15-generic-pae (buildd@zirconium) (gcc version
4.6.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3) ) #26-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 20
17:07:31 UTC 2012
- the browser, including version
Mozilla Firefox 9.0.1
- the font
body:text {
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:50:18PM +0200, Escape Landsome wrote:
- the browser, including version
Mozilla Firefox 9.0.1
There was a bug in Firefox 9 causing the behaviour you described, it
have been fixed in Firefox 10:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=714067
Regards,
Khaled
On 31/03/2012, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
This means that even if there's a font change between two letters (for
example due to a fallback for some letters or diacritics), each letter
should contonue to adopt its normative joining behavior (i.e.
displaying their correct joining
Le 1 avril 2012 19:24, Christopher Fynn chris.f...@gmail.com a écrit :
Even then
it would require some protocol allowing the lookups in each font to
interact.
There's smart mechanism indicated in this list, used by OpenOffice,
that uses ZWJ for this purpose.
I think it is a **great
On 3/30/2012 5:36 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
Le 30 mars 2012 20:08, Julian Bradfieldjcb+unic...@inf.ed.ac.uk a écrit :
On 2012-03-30, Andreas Prilopprilop4...@trashmail.net wrote:
I think a better idea is to have joining glyphs always even for
different typefaces. At least the Unicode
I was not speaking about ligatures like lan+alef. But really about the
contextual forms chosen from base letters (and independantly of the
diacritics applied to them, except for a few of them that use
different shapes in some combinations for these contextual joining
forms and that are encoded
A test table for all Arabic characters that have defined joining types
(and most characters that are not joining) can be seen on this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Arabic_alphabet_shapes/joining
This table is sorted by joining type, then by joining group.
You'll note that some
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:55:28AM +0200, Philippe Verdy wrote:
For now I've not seen any existing Arabic font that exhibit the
correct normative joining behavior for these letters such as U+063D
(the Farsi Yeh with an inverted v above, which is dual-joining like
the Farsi Yeh at U+06CC
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:37:53PM +0200, Andreas Prilop wrote:
I come back to
http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2012-m03/thread.html#11
A similar problem of showing non-joining, isolated Arabic glyphs
can be seen in the attached file. Both Internet Explorer 8 and
MS Word 2010
I am testing it in the latest version of chrome, which was release
long after the latest Unicode addition to the Arabic letters (notably
the last update of Arabic joining types in the UCD). So may be it's
the internal engine used in Chrome that still does not support these
mandatory joining types.
This is smart... provided that fonts also map the ZWJ (not all Arabic
fonts map it, they often map only ZWNJ to disable joinings, assuming
that there's no reason to force the joining in normal texts; some
Arabic fonts do not even map ZWNJ as well).
Some Arabic fonts do not even map the joining
is to have joining glyphs always even for
different typefaces. At least the Unicode Standard should say
what should happen when Arabic characters of different typefaces
follow each other.Title: Joining Arabic Letters
On 2012-03-30, Andreas Prilop prilop4...@trashmail.net wrote:
I think a better idea is to have joining glyphs always even for
different typefaces. At least the Unicode Standard should say
what should happen when Arabic characters of different typefaces
follow each other.
How can it? Unicode
Not really. Even if there is only one typeface involved, the joining
behavior of Arabic letters is normative and in scope.
This means that even if there's a font change between two letters (for
example due to a fallback for some letters or diacritics), each letter
should contonue to adopt its
16 matches
Mail list logo
