Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Deseret alphabet?

2017-03-24 Thread Martin J. Dürst
On 2017/03/23 22:32, Michael Everson wrote: What is right for Deseret has to be decided by and for Deseret users, rather than by script historians. Odd. That view doesn’t seem to be applicable to CJK unification. Well, it may not seem to you, but actually it is. I have had a lot of

Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Deseret alphabet?

2017-03-23 Thread Michael Everson
> On 23 Mar 2017, at 05:54, Martin J. Dürst wrote: > > Hello Michael, others, > > [Fixed script name in subject.] > > On 2017/03/23 09:03, Michael Everson wrote: >> On 22 Mar 2017, at 21:39, David Starner wrote: > >>> There's the same characters

Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Deseret alphabet?

2017-03-23 Thread Philippe Verdy
2017-03-23 6:54 GMT+01:00 Martin J. Dürst : > Hello Michael, others, > > On 2017/03/23 09:03, Michael Everson wrote: > >> On 22 Mar 2017, at 21:39, David Starner wrote: >> > > There's the same characters here, written in different ways. >>> >> >> No,

Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Deseret alphabet?

2017-03-23 Thread Richard Wordingham
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:23:27 +0100 Otto Stolz wrote: > Same issue as with German sharp S: The blackletter »ß« derives from an > ſ-z ligature (thence its German name »Eszet«), whilst the Roman type > »ß« derives from an ſ-s ligature. Still, we encode both variants as >

Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Deseret alphabet?

2017-03-23 Thread Otto Stolz
Hello Michael, others, On 2017/03/23 09:03, Michael Everson wrote: Its the same diphthong (a sound) written with different letters. Am 23.03.2017 um 06:54 schrieb Martin J. Dürst: I think this may well be the *historically* correct analysis. And that may have some influence on how to encode

Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Deseret alphabet?

2017-03-23 Thread James Kass
Martin J. Dürst wrote, > What is right for Deseret has to be decided by > and for Deseret users, rather than by script > historians. The Universal Character Set is used by everyone, including script historians. While modern day deployment of the script is determined by its users, the proper

Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Deseret alphabet?

2017-03-23 Thread Martin J. Dürst
Hello Michael, others, [Fixed script name in subject.] On 2017/03/23 09:03, Michael Everson wrote: On 22 Mar 2017, at 21:39, David Starner wrote: There's the same characters here, written in different ways. No, it’s not. Its the same diphthong (a sound) written with