From: kefas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is easily done by assigning the U-codes to some
keys on the keyboard, but I dont know how to combine
this with the pressing and releasing of CAPS.
MSKBLC.exe , keyboard-layout-creator, does not allow
for that.
Hmmm actually, if one puts the alternate
Doug Ewell scripsit:
I've never understood why writing Hebrew or Arabic left-to-right is
called visual order anyway. These are RTL scripts; they are supposed
to be not only written, but also read, right-to-left. Wouldn't a reader
of Hebrew or Arabic consider RTL to BE the visual order?
Of
RtL-characters are a major break-through in Unicode!
Please see inserted remarks to your comments!
On Monday 01 November 2004 10:16 pm, you wrote:
From: kefas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inserting unicode/basic-hebrew reults in a
convinient RtL, right-to-left, advance of the
cursor, but the
See inserted remarks.
On Sunday 31 October 2004 05:05 am, you wrote:
If you're going to quote an rtl phrase in an ltr
context, you want to use an embedding. In plaintext,
this would mean putting an RLE (U+202B) character
before the phrase and a PDF (U+202C)after it.
That is easily done by
From: kefas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inserting unicode/basic-hebrew reults in a convinient
RtL, right-to-left, advance of the cursor, but the
space-character jumps to the far right. Is there a
RtL-space?
In MS-Word and OpenOffice I can only change whole
paragraphs to RtL-entry. But quoting just a few
Philippe Verdy verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr wrote:
Visual entry should never be used. It was used for some legacy
encodings to render text on devices that don't implement the Bidi
algorithm and can only render text as LTR. Nobody enters RTL text in
pseudo-visual LTR order; only the
At 09:48 PM 11/1/2004, Doug Ewell wrote:
Philippe Verdy verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr wrote:
Visual entry should never be used. It was used for some legacy
encodings to render text on devices that don't implement the Bidi
algorithm and can only render text as LTR. Nobody enters RTL text
I've never understood why writing Hebrew or Arabic left-to-right is
called visual order anyway. These are RTL scripts; they are supposed
to be not only written, but also read, right-to-left. Wouldn't a reader
of Hebrew or Arabic consider RTL to BE the visual order?
I see it thusly:
If this
fantasai fantasai dot lists at inkedblade dot net wrote:
kefas wrote:
Inserting unicode/basic-hebrew reults in a convinient
RtL, right-to-left, advance of the cursor, but the
space-character jumps to the far right. Is there a
RtL-space?
In MS-Word and OpenOffice I can only change whole
Inserting unicode/basic-hebrew reults in a convinient
RtL, right-to-left, advance of the cursor, but the
space-character jumps to the far right. Is there a
RtL-space?
In MS-Word and OpenOffice I can only change whole
paragraphs to RtL-entry. But quoting just a few
words in hebrew WITHIN a
-hebrew RtL-space ?
Inserting unicode/basic-hebrew reults in a convinient
RtL, right-to-left, advance of the cursor, but the
space-character jumps to the far right. Is there a
RtL-space?
In MS-Word and OpenOffice I can only change whole
paragraphs to RtL-entry. But quoting just a few
kefas wrote:
Inserting unicode/basic-hebrew reults in a convinient
RtL, right-to-left, advance of the cursor, but the
space-character jumps to the far right. Is there a
RtL-space?
In MS-Word and OpenOffice I can only change whole
paragraphs to RtL-entry. But quoting just a few
words in
12 matches
Mail list logo
