Re: [Unicon-group] unicon -C ==> -fs tweak

2017-06-13 Thread Sergey Logichev
Brian, Performance gain >4x sounds quite pretty. I see that using loadfunc gives about the same speed as pure C (and even faster!!!).Your investigations are damned interesting as usual. I will be glad to help you in some degree. If you need programmers to writesample average Unicon code for

Re: [Unicon-group] unicon -C ==> -fs tweak

2017-06-13 Thread Sergey Logichev
Brian, So, it's unfortuanately just a misprint: "Unicon -load 0,04 ... C 0,05"? One percent slower it is also great!I have some experience in VAX/VMS and RSX-11M too. These things were always such interesting and intruguing for me...But then I left defence and gone to freedom :-) I am now settled

Re: [Unicon-group] unicon -C ==> -fs tweak

2017-06-13 Thread Brian Tiffin
Sergey Logichev wrote: > Jafar, > > That are the great news! I hope the implementation of iconc approach > to build will be completed soon. I am very interesting in that as I > suppose performance will increase on some factor. I am waiting with > patience. > Good luck! > Sergey Excuse the topic

Re: [Unicon-group] unicon -C ==> -fs tweak

2017-06-13 Thread Sergey Logichev
So, it's unfortuanately just a misprint: "Unicon -load 0,04 ... C 0,05"? One percent slower it is also great!I have some experience in VAX/VMS and RSX-11M too. These things were always such interesting and intruguing for me...But then I left defence and gone to freedom :-) I am now settled at

Re: [Unicon-group] unicon -C ==> -fs tweak

2017-06-13 Thread Sergey Logichev
Brian,That's right - say about Unicon only truth and nothing else! And never hurry to make fast conclusion. That are the main principles, of course.Pi2 is a great thing and currently supports a lot of different OSes. Guys even found a way to emulate x86 architecture on this tiny board!There is IoT

[Unicon-group] Use of iconc over iconx

2017-06-13 Thread Bruce & Breeanna Rennie
Good morning to all this lovely day, Reading the various responses to Clinton's original message on [unicon -C ==> -fs tweak], gives rise to a question. How many people actively use the iconc over iconx? Since I started using Icon back in 1986, I have never come across a situation where I

Re: [Unicon-group] Use of iconc over iconx

2017-06-13 Thread Sergey Logichev
Brian,I am completely agree with you. If we would have native object code independ from language itself we could expand limits to the infinity. I remember that glory days, when I programmed on VAX/VMS (openVMS). No matter which compiler you take you could link object files from Fortan, Pascal, C,

[Unicon-group] Svn Update

2017-06-13 Thread Jafar Al-Gharaibeh
Greetings Fellow Uniconers, I committed changes to svn today and I will make more changes over the next few days that affect the configuration and the build system of Unicon. I would like to bring up two points to your attention: 1- If you are on a production system my advice is to refrain

Re: [Unicon-group] Use of iconc over iconx

2017-06-13 Thread Brian Tiffin
Bruce & Breeanna Rennie wrote: > Good morning to all this lovely day, > > Reading the various responses to Clinton's original message on [unicon > -C ==> -fs tweak], gives rise to a question. > > How many people actively use the iconc over iconx? > > Since I started using Icon back in 1986, I have

Re: [Unicon-group] unicon -C ==> -fs tweak

2017-06-13 Thread Sergey Logichev
Jafar, That are the great news! I hope the implementation of iconc approach to build will be completed soon. I am very interesting in that as I suppose performance will increase on some factor. I am waiting with patience.Good luck!Sergey 13.06.2017, 09:27, "Jafar Al-Gharaibeh"