Pearson's HE Portal is going to be going to uPortal 3.1.x soon and we have been
doing some performance testing. The only issue I've ran into was in the event
that all users were users new to uPortal. The problem was not that uPortal
3.1.x did not handle the load, but that it did so a good
Do the tomcats for all 3 have similar configurations? Am especially interested
in any sort of compression/gzip configs. Have you used the yslow plugin to
compare the versions of uPortal? If so... are there any new suggestions with
the later versions or decreases in ratings for specific
+1
- Original Message -
From: Eric Domazlicky edomazli...@tacomacc.edu
To: uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 3:55:29 PM GMT -07:00 U.S. Mountain Time
(Arizona)
Subject: RE: [uportal-dev] uPortal and JDK support
Dropping JDK 5 support makes sense to me.
+1 Jen Bourey
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Petro ape...@unicon.net
To: uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:02:15 PM GMT -07:00 U.S. Mountain Time (Arizona)
Subject: [uportal-dev] Nominating Jen Bourey for uPortal Project Steering
Committee
uPortal
+1
Sounds like a good idea. Neither myself nor the projects I work on will have
any problems with the change.
Lennard
- Original Message -
From: Eric Dalquist eric.dalqu...@doit.wisc.edu
To: uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 12:57:48 PM GMT -07:00 U.S.
(myself and Lennard Fuller) here at Unicon have both
separately found out the hard way, that property files in up3 are
packaged up in a jar file.
I was wondering what the theory for that is. As both a developer and
system deployer, I find this needlessly painful. It's a lot easier if
the file
+1
Eric Dalquist wrote:
I'd like to propose making Tuy a uPortal committer, she has provided
several high-quality patches and enhancements to uPortal 3.0 both pre
and post release and it would be good to have her committing these on
her own.
-Eric
As a reminder votes need three positive
+1
Eric Dalquist wrote:
My current plan is to cut the uPortal 3.0.0-GA release this week
(Wednesday or Thursday). There are only a few Jira issues remaining
[1] and none of the fixes since RC3 have been major changes.
[1]
+1
We've used hibernate pretty extensively on a number of projects, both
large and small, overall I've been very pleased with the results. You
are likely already aware of this, but the Spring community no longer
recommends using the HibernateTemplate and instead prefers a
template-less
, with the actual production portlets I am using it gives
every indication of being usable.
Lennard
Lennard Fuller wrote:
Has anyone else seen this issue?
Steps to reproduce:
1) Using uPortal configured for DLM, Login as the guest-lo user and
add three portlets to the layout. I selected RSS
Has anyone else seen this issue?
Steps to reproduce:
1) Using uPortal configured for DLM, Login as the guest-lo user and add
three portlets to the layout. I selected RSS Portlet, Test Portlet 1,
Test Portlet 2
2) Bounce the portal (this is necessary in order to get your layout
changes to
+1
Cris J Holdorph wrote:
I propose we turn this property to false by default in the 2.6 branch.
This property has always caused a problem with Portlets and IE. It
just doesn't seem like the default behavior out of the box should be
'broke'. If an institution likes the behavior they can
I've been following this thread for a while now, and for the life of me
can not see why the portlet web applications that we have running in
uPortal 2.5.3 (using Tomcat 5.5.23) have not suffered these types of
errors. We have multiple web applications with multiple portlets, each
portlet
I am definitely for requiring a jira number.
+ 1
Eric Dalquist wrote:
Brad Szabo was kind enough to share a SVN script that would require a
Jira issue id to be referenced in the commit message for any commit. The
script can be bypassed explicitly by adding NOJIRA instead of an issue
ID and
14 matches
Mail list logo
