When trying to understand the urjtag program code, I needed to get
definitions of the types used. I many cases typedefs was used for
structs and unions, making it unnessesary hard to the understand the
type. The worst offenders was in include/urjtag/types.h where the
typedefs is in a different
Geert Stappers:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:23:10PM +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> > My driver seems to be working now.
> > Please review and/or commit the attached diff and files.
>
> Now available as
> https://sourceforge.net/p/urjtag/git/ci/bae418ae734a7908a3c3ecf0ebf0432fe543ee5b/
> So at
Karl:
> But what is the best way to update the manufacturers list ?
>
> Jedec uses bank, and id within bank. How do I convert that to the
> format used in data/MANUFACTURERS ?
...
I come up the the attached code.
The urjtag file has three columns:
$ grep Hitachi data/MANUFACTURERS
G G:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:44:45PM +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote:
...
> > The urjtag file has three columns:
> >
> > $ grep Hitachi data/MANUFACTURERS
> > 111 hitachi Hitachi
> >
> > and mine only has two:
> >
> > $ ./jep106 | grep Hitachi
> > 111 Hitachi
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:50:53AM +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> Geert Stappers:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:23:10PM +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> > > My driver seems to be working now.
> > > Please review and/or commit the attached diff and files.
> >
> > Now available as
> >
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:44:45PM +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> Karl:
> > But what is the best way to update the manufacturers list ?
> >
> > Jedec uses bank, and id within bank. How do I convert that to the
> > format used in data/MANUFACTURERS ?
> ...
>
> I come up the the attached code.
Geert Stappers:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019
> > Would you accept patches that ?
>
> All patches will be reviewed.
...
That is very good, thanks.
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
___
UrJTAG-development mailing list
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019
> Would you accept patches that ?
All patches will be reviewed.
Good enough patches get accepted.
Not yet good enough patches get further discussion.
Patches too far away from good enough get rejection.
Please note that these are emotional the hard
Karl:
> When trying to understand the urjtag program code, I needed to get
> definitions of the types used. I many cases typedefs was used for
> structs and unions, making it unnessesary hard to the understand the
> type. The worst offenders was in include/urjtag/types.h where the
> typedefs
