I switched to 2.6 for a few hours, and during that time I made some
edits and saved a stack I have been working on for some months.
I switched back to 2.5.1 due to bugs so I could continue development
on my stack. The stack acts goofy now.
Here is a snippet of code:
repeat with j=1 to 20
I could use some help. I am not sure how to approach trying to
recover my stack. I have lots of backups, but I have to go back many
revisions to find a stack the does not produce this error (prior to
my brief encounter with 2.6). My stack is just one card, but it has
many groups and
I would say try creating a new stack and copying over all of the objects
and scripts.
Sometimes stacks become corrupted, and this often works to fix that.
Sometimes objects become corrupted, and recreating that object might
work in that situation.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Dennis Brown wrote:
I could use some help. I am not sure how to approach trying to recover
my stack. I have lots of backups, but I have to go back many revisions
to find a stack the does not produce this error (prior to my brief
encounter with 2.6).
If the Rev IDE is not reporting
repeat with j=1 to 20
put j --mssg box contains 1
get Typ[min(i+1+j,DateLines)] --error on this line
executing at 11:59:32 AM
TypeFunction: error in source expression
Objectcard id 1002
Lineget Typ[min(i+1+j,DateLines)]
Hintcard id 1002
The error is
Richard,Sarah,Mark,Jon
I found the problem and my face is a bit red. It was not stack
corruption, it was a caused by a typo that caused a missing global
declaration. The error just by coincidence happened to occur during
the few hours I was trying to run on 2.6. I had so many reverts
Dennis Brown wrote:
Richard,Sarah,Mark,Jon
I found the problem and my face is a bit red. It was not stack
corruption, it was a caused by a typo
That's good news for everyone. Typos are easy to fix, but corruption
isn't.
Fortunately, given the way Rev handles its files, corrupted stack
