Adjusting indexinterval is unlikely to be useful on very narrow rows.
(Its purpose is to make random access to _large_ rows doable.)
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Chris Burroughs
chris.burrou...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a case with very narrow rows. As such I have a large row cache
that does
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Adjusting indexinterval is unlikely to be useful on very narrow rows.
(Its purpose is to make random access to _large_ rows doable.)
Whoops, that's column_index_size_in_kb.
I'd play w/ keycache before index_interval
On 04/05/2011 09:57 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
Adjusting indexinterval is unlikely to be useful on very narrow rows.
(Its purpose is to make random access to _large_ rows doable.)
Whoops, that's column_index_size_in_kb.
