; pabbireddyavin...@gmail.com>; user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Stable version apache cassandra 3.X /3.0.X
>
>
>
> On sync in Jon.
>
>
>
> Only go 3.0.x if you REALLY need something from there (ex: MV) even then,
> be carefull.
>
>
>
> 3.x
gt;
Cc: Junaid Nasir <jna...@an10.io>; pabbireddy avinash
<pabbireddyavin...@gmail.com>; user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Stable version apache cassandra 3.X /3.0.X
On sync in Jon.
Only go 3.0.x if you REALLY need something from there (ex: MV) even then, be
carefull.
3.x wai
On sync in Jon.
Only go 3.0.x if you REALLY need something from there (ex: MV) even then,
be carefull.
3.x wait for 3.11.x. 3.10 if you REALLY need something from there right now.
Latest 2.2.x or 2.1.x if you are just doing baseline Cassandra and need the
stability.
Regards,
Carlos Juzarte
I really wouldn't go by the tick tock blog post, considering tick tock is
dead.
I'm still not wild about putting any 3.0 or 3.x into production. 3.0
removed off heap memtables and there have been enough bugs in the storage
engine that I'm still wary. My hope is to see 3.11.x get enough bug
as mentioned here
http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/cassandra-2-2-3-0-and-beyond
> Under normal conditions, we will NOT release 3.x.y stability releases for
> x > 0. That is, we will have a traditional 3.0.y stability series, but the
> odd-numbered bugfix-only releases will fill that role for the
Hi,
We are planning to deploy a cassandra production cluster on 3.X /3.0.X .
Please let us know if there is any stable version in 3.X/3.0.X that we
could deploy in production .
Regards,
Avinash.
