Re: Geronimo role security

2007-07-31 Thread Aman Nanner/MxI Technologies
Subject Re: Geronimo role security Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Geronimo role security

2007-07-30 Thread David Jencks
As you can probably tell from my actions re GERONIMO-3357, I can't reproduce this problem, and I even wrote a test app to look into it. Can you compare what you are doing and the results you are getting to the testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/sec-test app now present in g. 2.0 and trunk?

Re: Geronimo role security

2007-07-19 Thread David Jencks
On Jul 19, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Aman Nanner/MxI Technologies wrote: The fake EAR did start ok. I can try deploying the realm as a plain GBean plan, but I'm not sure how to go about doing this as I've only been deploying J2EE modules to this point (EAR, WAR, etc.). Is there some good

Re: Geronimo role security

2007-07-18 Thread David Jencks
run-as handling is completely different in 2.0. Instead of constructing a subject out of xml, the run-as subject comes from logging into a login module just like any other subject. You have to do several things: -- set up a security realm so the desired subject can in fact be created

Re: Geronimo role security

2007-07-18 Thread Aman Nanner/MxI Technologies
I tried out the solution, but I'm still having problems in that the JSP is not running under the desired run-as role. I cannot see in the TomcatGeronimoRealm where this run-as role is being set, or if it is accessing the credential store to get the run-as subject. The actual configuration of the

Re: Geronimo role security

2007-07-18 Thread David Jencks
Urrk, I'm trying to do too many things at once today :-( Could you try putting the security realm in a separate configuration and putting that in as a dependency for the ear? If we can see if that eliminates the hiccup and whether that helps find the run-as subject it would be very

Re: Geronimo role security

2007-07-18 Thread Aman Nanner/MxI Technologies
I declared the security realm in a separate EAR, and then put a dependency on that EAR from my real EAR, but it didn't solve the problem. In fact, the realm lookup failed both the first time and the second time (instead of succeeding the second time). Can an EAR access a Realm declared within

Re: Geronimo role security

2007-07-18 Thread David Jencks
it should be able to, but maybe I'm missing something. The fake ear started ok? I was thinking you could just deploy a plain gbean plan with dependencies on the jars that have the security classes, similar to the built in server-security-config. If you can get on IRC we might be able to

Geronimo role security

2007-07-17 Thread Aman Nanner/MxI Technologies
Hi, I'm using the latest Geronimo 2.0 snapshot from the codebase. I understand that security has changed somewhat from Geronimo 1.2. I'm running into an issue where I have a JSP with a specific run-as role calling a secured EJB. This JSP has its run-as role defined in the web.xml as follows:

Re: Geronimo role security

2007-07-17 Thread Michael Galloway McLean
I have unsubscribed. Please make sure I am removed from this list.

Re: Geronimo role security

2007-07-17 Thread Aman Nanner/MxI Technologies
It would appear that the TomcatGeronimoRealm.hasResourcePermission(...) method does not apply the run-as role if one is defined. If this indeed the case, then I believe this is a bug Aman Nanner/MxI Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07-17-2007 10:55:23 PM: Hi, I'm using the latest