The entity value caches in Moqui and OFBiz are similar in concept, and I’ve
looked into using a distributed cache for them but it is not a good fit.
The reason is that these are not simple key/value caches where invalidation is
a simple matter (for that you would have to restrict to ONLY
> On 25 Jan 2016, at 03:30, hoboy2 wrote:
>
> Maybe this mail will be double I am very sorry about that.
>
> I am investigating the usage of edi/edifact in ofbiz.
> Does ofbiz support them ?
If you need this for an existing OFBiz project and will implement something
Those are not really a work around, but rather a mechanism to falling back to
the more flexible tools when more efficient tools don't suffice for a certain
screen/etc, and they are all over the framework.
The best practice is not to avoid them altogether, but rather when you use
As I recall there is a stripped-down container config file that is used when
deployed in an external servlet container, and this was used instead of
ofbiz-containers.xml (or any of the others in framework/base/config).
How it works now I don't know... most stuff looks the same but in the
Thank you Scott. This is an inspiring reminder of how things actually work in
the ASF. Apache OFBiz is not managed top-down, it is managed bottom-up based on
actual effort and merit. Discussions really only matter if they lead up to an
effort that results in actual code/doc/etc changes.
This really isn't the place to discuss Moqui Framework and related projects.
This mailing list is about OFBiz. Please contact me directly if you'd like to
discuss this, either on LinkedIn, the Moqui SourceForge project, or by email
(my contact info is easy to find... even from this email).
Is it really sad?
It is just my opinion, but what OFBiz really needs is a more flexible
structure... though not how that would work exactly.
One case in point is my decision to start and independent effort to create a
redesigned and more modern framework, and refine the data model and
ERP systems are complex, but implementations are often large and complex mostly
due to inadequate tools and practices, and generally poor organization,
resulting in large volume of code that is highly redundant and inflexible. It
doesn't HAVE to be this way, it just usually is.
If the
or committers. I don't know how best to
deal with the it but I do think PMC members initiating in such discussions
should consider whether they have the best interests of the project at heart
and act accordingly.
Regards
Scott
On 1/06/2013, at 12:57 PM, David E. Jones wrote:
I suppose I'm
I suppose I'm just as guilty of this as Al.
Doing this sort of thing has been common since the beginning of OFBiz and
includes users, contributors, committers, and once it existed PMC members too.
There have been all sorts of discussions over time about alternative tools and
even alternative
On May 22, 2013, at 10:28 AM, John J. Meise, Jr.
jmeis...@jamesriverlaser.com wrote:
I did, however, receive an answer to my question when Carsten responded.
So thank you, Carsten, for assuring me that I do, indeed, have the correct
e-mail address! Now I know for sure that if I don't get a
OFBiz has recently turned 12 years old. At the time it was written many more
modern libraries either didn't exist or were not usable, including:
- Groovy
- ehcache
- Quartz Scheduler
- Atomikos
- JackRabbit (and JCR in general)
- Shiro
- Camel
- JSON-RPC, REST, JSON in general
- ElasticSearch
The price calculation starts with the list price, so you'd have to change that
too.
-David
On Sep 12, 2012, at 3:49, Reelsen, Alexander alexander.reel...@lusini.com
wrote:
Hi there,
I tried to play around with price rules a bit, and I am wondering why they
only apply if a product has a
What OFBiz track? Is there even a single session on OFBiz, let alone an entire
track?
-David
On Jul 18, 2012, at 3:31, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a pity that the OFBiz track is not mentioned in this notification.
2012/7/18 Erwan de FERRIERES
ApacheCon EU Event. I believe that warrants an OFBiz track.
Would you also be interested to do one on OFBiz?
Regards,
Pierre
2012/7/18 David E Jones d...@me.com
What OFBiz track? Is there even a single session on OFBiz, let alone an
entire track?
-David
On Jul 18, 2012, at 3
Actually, OFBiz already supports this stuff and has been through many different
PCI audits.
As a starting point, for configuration options see the security.properties file.
-David
On Jul 3, 2012, at 5:16 AM, Gaurav23 A wrote:
Hi All,
As a part of PCI DSS version 2.0 compliance there are
It seems funny to propose removing a feature which you don't understand, or
even deprecating it without a replacement.
-David
On Jun 10, 2012, at 2:36, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
I did not check but from the date you gave it's an old feature from the pre
ASF era
Paul is correct, the multi-tenant stuff has nothing to do with code
deployment and tenants don't have access to code. If you use OFBiz in a
multi-tenant mode all tenants will be running on the same code base.
Whoever is managing that code base could write tenant-aware code so that
it only
Thread safety issues come from the use of static fields in a class, not static
methods.
-David
Foo Shyn Chung wrote:
Hi all,
This may sounds stupid, please spare me =p.
I've noticed that methods in the Services class are written as static and
i'd come across a discussion thread that
You can get the HTTP request method from the standard Java
HttpServletRequest object.
-David
Wai wrote:
Are there any flags or methods currently implemented within ofbiz to let me
know whether the current request is a GET or a POST, other than referring to
ControlServlet.doGet() and
seems
counter-intuitive), or should we create a separate Retailer entity to
track these? Any thoughts?
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 13:44 -0800, David E Jones wrote:
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
2) If you look at how vendor/supplier is used in some of the OFBiz
applications, you might observe
, 09 Dec 2011 18:31:29
To:user@ofbiz.apache.org
Reply-To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: vendors and suppliers
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi David:
Nice to hear from you again. Thanks for your input. I have some
responses. Please see below:
On 12/9/11 4:44 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Ruth
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
2) If you look at how vendor/supplier is used in some of the OFBiz
applications, you might observe that:
A vendor supplies goods or services to the Company of record for the
OFBiz instance. Those goods or services may be raw materials for
manufacturing, products for
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi David:
Nice to hear from you again. Thanks for your input. I have some
responses. Please see below:
On 12/9/11 4:44 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
2) If you look at how vendor/supplier is used in some of the OFBiz
applications, you might observe
A quick note: the Fixed Asset functionality is part of the accounting
component of OFBiz, so in that way it is true that you must use the
accounting part of OFBiz.
However, this does not mean that you have to the OFBiz General Ledger or
for accounting transactions in general. Those can easily be
That message is a warning. Is it happening on shutdown? If so, that is normal.
There is a shutdown hook missing somewhere that no one has bothered to fix.
During operation (i.e. everything up to shutdown) this is not a problem, and my
guess about the chances that this is causing a performance
You can do a delegator.removeByCondition with a null condition (should work,
haven't tried it), or the equivalent in simple-method.
There is also a delegator.removeAll(entityName) method… looks like just the
dangerous sort of operation you seek.
-David
On Sep 22, 2011, at 12:24 AM, Sam
Did you try X Quantity of Product == 2?
Also, make sure you have enough of the GWP Product in stock.
-David
On Sep 22, 2011, at 12:28 AM, deb.pa...@tcs.com wrote:
Correction below on the conditon
The condition is X quantity of product is greater than or equal to 2
My query is how is the
On Sep 1, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Weird you (almost?) always answer only directly to me, is that intended?
I've noticed that your recent replies to the mailing list have had 2 addresses
in the Reply-To header, the mailing list one and your individual one. Most
replies will
On Aug 4, 2011, at 6:39 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
It sounds like you speaking of Ofbiz as a finished product, in which
case I agree with you first paragraph. However Ofbiz is not a finished
product and is meant for Consultants to setup for end users. The
consultant should know this information
There is some code OOTB to select among multiple Facilities associated with a
ProductStore, but in most cases where an organization has multiple facilities
it is necessary to customize this. This basically does the inventory
reservation across multiple facilities.
The order itself should NOT
If you want to get more involved with OFBiz all you need to do is discuss the
stuff you want to build on the dev mailing list, then contribute the stuff you
do through the ASF Jira, and off you go.
Once you have contributed enough for existing PMC members to trust you, then
you will be
On Jul 25, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
Thank you David.
This is what I wanted to know. If it's a configuration issue or
something has to change in the code. It looks that I need to do both.
Please see my comments.
On Mon Jul 25,2011 07:40 am, David E Jones wrote:
Mansour
, and will let you know
how it went.
Thank you.
On Mon Jul 25,2011 09:53 am, David E Jones wrote:
On Jul 25, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
Thank you David.
This is what I wanted to know. If it's a configuration issue or
something has to change in the code. It looks that I need
An Eclipse plugin might be something better as a separate project with download
links from wiki pages and such.
Not everything related to OFBiz needs to go in the OFBiz SVN repo...
-David
On Jul 23, 2011, at 7:58 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
sounds interesting, if you think it is use full to
It looks like the only best practice on it is the one sub-page about only
referring to partyId using a join table with the ID of the related entity, a
partyId and a roleTypeId. Then it lists dozens of exceptions. I didn't look
up who made that page, but given the number of exceptions I hope
I know various people have expressed interest in Maven over the years. From a
quick search I see such discussions going back to 2003!
OFBiz would definitely benefit from more modularization, and Maven may be able
to help with that. However, it is just a tool and would still require
I heard a rumor that Tata (TCS) has an ecommerce system that is based on OFBiz,
though with re-written ecommerce and catalog/etc management applications.
Has anyone heard of this, or even better... is anyone involved with this effort
at TCS or perhaps using it in their company or for a client?
ofbiz to
use maven is a considerably bigger project.
On 13 Jul 2011, at 15:01, David E Jones wrote:
I know various people have expressed interest in Maven over the years. From
a quick search I see such discussions going back to 2003!
OFBiz would definitely benefit from more
Hello all,
I'm in Amsterdam until July 22nd visiting a client and have some time free on
evenings and weekends to meet with others in the area who have an interest in
Apache OFBiz (and Moqui if you really twist my arm to talk about it... ;) ).
If you're interested please contact me directly
As BJ mentioned there are some techniques in OFBiz already for this. My
favorite is using the form widget and the CSV output it supports (pretty easy
to configure the columns, can also be used for visual display/etc). A plain FTL
template also works well (especially with the #t and #lt tags to
There's nothing we can do about bad specs like SOAP. However, consider that
OFBiz is just one little open source project, and hasn't seen even close to one
percent of the investment in development that .NET or even SalesForce.com have.
On the other hand, there are good tools for building SOAP
I'd recommend doing more research on SOAP and XML-RPC. They are VERY different
specifications.
If you're using SOAP in many cases it is just a very heavy and expensive
wrapper around an XML payload that represents the actual data to be
transferred. Those XML payloads are generally defined
and the only mention of
quick add I see is:
Unless you know you want to use the special Quick Add categories in this
Catalog, I recommend setting the Use Quick Add field to N.
Which doesn't help much.
Thanks,
Scott
On 6/2/2011 11:07 AM, David E Jones wrote:
The Quick Add categories
Hello all,
I used to meet with people interested in OFBiz all the time while traveling but
haven't for a while, and was thinking recently it would be nice to do again.
I'm in California in the Silicon Valley area (actually in San Jose) for the
next two weeks or so. If there is anyone in the
:05 PM, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by creating a branch. Typically a branch is
used to make it easier to a small group to collaborate on something that is
involves non-trivial changes (ie that will take some time), and that if done
partially would break
Take a look at the Business Production Setup Guide and the Technical Production
Setup Guide.
The easiest way (IMO) to handle what you're describing is to modify the demo
data files to match your desired configuration, and then load just your
modified files along with the seed data.
It's also
The Quick Add categories are for something other than what you describe (see
the Business Production Setup Guide).
The best match for what you describe is probably done by setting a quantity on
ProductCategoryMember records (from the category side or the product side).
When you do that links
Gavin,
One quick note: you can (and probably should) remove the Copyright ... The
Apache Software Foundation... line. That copyright would represent the content
of the page, which is clearly not owned by the ASF.
It is in the OOTB templates, though I've wondered if we shouldn't remove it
This isn't a very tough problem, it always has three parts:
1. authenticate the user
2. authorization that the user has access to the resource
3. if all is well, stream the resource to the client, otherwise blow up
The trick comes in #2 with what qualifies as authorization, and that will vary
There hasn't been a lot of interest in that feature, so it isn't totally
implemented.
Basically don't use the entity-alias attribute on the condition-expr element,
and make sure the field-name matches an alias on the view-entity (ie to do a
condition on a field it must be aliased for now).
Is it even possible to have a single decision about what would go in each
level, or would this tend to vary in different user organizations?
If this were something configurable would it need to be on a screen level, on a
form field level, or something even more detailed?
-David
On Apr 25,
be customised if a organisation wants
to or left default.
Rather than beginner, intermediate and full it would be role based e.g.
Warehouse Picker, Warehouse Packer, PO Creator, PO Approver, Product Manager
etc.
Sam
On 26 Apr 2011, at 02:09, David E Jones wrote:
Is it even
The easiest way is to set the Quantity Included to 1.33 and the corresponding
units to square meter, and consider each quantity entered by the customer to be
a multiple of that. In other words, if they order 2 then they are ordering 2.66
square meters (and with the product setup that way you
As for naming all id fields just plain id, it makes it far more difficult
to keep track of foreign keys. The nice thing about giving even sequenced ID
fields a somewhat unique name is that you can use that same name on other
entities/tables and have them match up automatically.
The Entity
It sounds like the problem is the attempt to use the Quick Ship code. If you
don't want to use inventory/facility data or functionality, then you can't use
the Quick Ship code which is all about inventory and facility.
If the goal is to get the order into the Complete status, then just use the
The best solution is probably to use the cart - request quote process.
You'll still need at least a default price on each product, which should just
be the list price (unless you want to change code).
-David
On Mar 25, 2011, at 10:20 AM, Carsten Schinzer wrote:
All,
I am having a
It might be better to use one of the render service (renderContentAsText if
you're organizing DataResource records with Content records, or
renderDataResourceAsText to go directly to DataResource). That adds a lot of
flexibility of the content management stuff.
If you go directly to the
You can look in the WebTools Cache maintenance screens to make sure the cache
name is correct, but yes, that's example the idea of how things should work in
the cache.properties file.
-David
On Mar 17, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Prashant Punekar wrote:
Hi,
Here is my understanding, please do
Actually for Catalog Manager stuff you need the business side of that doc:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/Apache+OFBiz+Business+Setup+Guide
-David
On Mar 16, 2011, at 4:07 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
This is old, you should rather refer to
It sounds like what you want to do is not a fork (which implies breaking away
from the project and never looking back), but rather a branch and more
specifically something along the lines of the vendor branch pattern which is
something very common.
-David
On Mar 14, 2011, at 1:27 AM, chris
in the community. Today a project can
have hundreds of forks, each trying out ideas that may get merged back in to
the main project. Forks now represent a vibrant and active community.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:45 PM, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote:
It sounds like what you want to do is not a fork
A quick search in the framework will show you the result of where this is.
To save you some time, the database meta-data maintenance code is all in the
DatabaseUtil.java file.
-David
On Mar 9, 2011, at 3:15 PM, James Lawton wrote:
I already have the latest connector installed and in the
How are you calling the service? Usually the service engine will handle the
begin/rollback/commit of transactions.
-David
On Mar 2, 2011, at 7:47 PM, Anne wrote:
Hi
When calling getInventoryAvailableByFacility service, I see messages
in the logs telling me
ERROR: Cannot do a find
There are also quite a few reports written using the standard OFBiz tools like
the Screen and Form Widgets.
-David
On Mar 1, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 01/03/2011 17:15, wdOnOFBiz a écrit :
I am looking for reports such as:
Aging report by invoice
Aging report by
that someone has been working on UNION statements inside the
entity engine. That would be a nice addition.
-Mark
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:12 PM, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote:
That's somewhat true, ie OFBiz mostly uses generic SQL, but there are
variations supported for different
That's somewhat true, ie OFBiz mostly uses generic SQL, but there are
variations supported for different databases configured on the datasource
element in the entityengine.xml file. Most of the variations are for the
meta-data operations (maintain tables, columns, indexes, fks), but they are
any Unicode character,
and you only pay the price in increased storage size for the non-ASCII
characters.
If that's the only problem, I humbly suggest the default encoding should be
changed to UTF-8.
Cheers
Paul Foxworthy
David E Jones-4 wrote:
On a side note, the only reason
On a side note, the only reason this isn't the default in OFBiz is that if you
use UTF-8 the size of each text column will be reduced to 1/3 of its specified
size because each UTF-8 character requires 3 bytes in MySQL, and the size of a
column in MySQL is in terms of bytes, and not in terms of
A/B testing has nothing to do with proper functioning of software, it is about
measuring the user response to it.
In ecommerce this usually means testing different cart/checkout designs or
product finding designs or whatever to see what results in larger and more
frequent orders, or less
considering. Is Javascript one of them (my pick)?
-Al
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:12 PM, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote:
Back to being serious: thank goodness technology has progressed far beyond
such things. They were ridiculously limited and
required huge amounts of human effort to create the simplest
That's why I still use DOS. You can learn everything there is to know about it
in a few weeks, and I got that out of the way nearly two decades ago. I'm a
happy camper.
-David
On Feb 23, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
The better tool is the one you know
Jacques
BJ Freeman
Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
David E Jones sent the following on 2/23/2011 12:37 PM:
That's why I still use DOS. You can
Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
David E Jones sent the following on 2/21/2011 11:18 PM:
Ousmane: if you're reading this please understand that while BJ is very
active in the OFBiz mailing lists, he isn't really
Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
David E Jones sent the following on 2/16/2011 4
BJ: what are you talking about? In what way has this been moved away from? Do
you mean the use of FTL templates?
Nope. In fact, FTL templates are meant to be used exclusively in
customer-facing sites, such as the ecommerce webapp in OFBiz.
-David
On Feb 21, 2011, at 9:55 PM, BJ Freeman
Ousmane: if you're reading this please understand that while BJ is very active
in the OFBiz mailing lists, he isn't really a contributor to OFBiz otherwise
and has no part in speaking for the project.
For a list of those with more official roles in the project, including the
Project
Did you get my response to your original question?
If not, go look it up. This is already well supported OOTB by the screen widget.
-David
On Feb 18, 2011, at 9:06 AM, skip@thedevers wrote:
This is a duplicated question. Sorry if you are looking at this a second
time. Here is the
BJ,
You wrote: I will have project similar to ofbiz.
Could be more specific about what you mean by that? How would it be similar,
and how would it be different?
-David
On Feb 15, 2011, at 4:59 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
I have applied for a gov grant to employ people.
if it comes through I
It's definitely oh-eff-biz. I asked the guy who made up the name and that's
what he said.
He also pointed out that if you were to try to pronounce the of part of the
name it wouldn't be off it would be of, as uv-biz, and that's just ugly,
so it's definitely oh-eff-biz.
;)
-David
On Feb 3,
This is what the virtual/variant products are designed for. If your base
product is a virtual product then it won't (can't) have inventory, and only
variants will have inventory.
The low-level data is somewhat complex, but if you create a product and set
isVirtual=Y then a new tab appears on
Brian,
Have you looked into the integration-oriented features of OFBiz? IMO SOAP is a
mess and while there has been a SOAP to OFBiz Service tool for a long time, it
has never been very good. However, the XML-RPC and JSON ones are pretty good,
and along with general XML message passing (like
I started a design effort along these lines a while back, perhaps it will get
some more interest and attention someday, perhaps:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/OFBiz+EZBiz
-David
On Jan 27, 2011, at 11:49 AM, ScottA wrote:
I'd love to see the accounting tightened
, at 10:59 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Do you really think that is the best idea? Isn't one of the problems with
OFBiz that everything is in one big pot, but not all users want the same
thing, and so there are constant fights about what should go into the single
pot?
Maybe it would be better
In addition to the other arguments to dispute this claim, have you considered
that most committers earn a living using OFBiz and so they survive by listening
to people from the outside.
Based on that you might adjust your attack to say that committers don't listen
to anyone from the outside
Before saying anything else, let me clarify that I don't disagree with this
sentiment.
The big question seems to be what is the clue that everyone wishes the PMC
has?
Personally, I now disagree with the whole model and doubt any redemption for
it. Even if there were perfect people on the PMC
I couldn't disagree more. The OFBiz code base is a NIGHTMARE because of
attempts at backward compatibility. This makes it incredibly difficult to
customize because everything you look at has high levels of redundancy (causing
all sorts of bugs and inconsistencies), and everything you touch
On Jan 20, 2011, at 9:02 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Thu, 1/20/11, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote:
What the project needs is cutoff points at major revision
releases after which attempts at backward compatibility are
totally abandoned in favor of making something better.
Why don't we
On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:30 PM, Brian Topping wrote:
On Jan 20, 2011, at 9:02 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Thu, 1/20/11, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote:
What the project needs is cutoff points at major revision
releases after which attempts at backward compatibility are
totally
On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:52 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Two new projects were started - OpenTaps and Moqui.
Speaking personally (and I stress personally - I'm not speaking on behalf of
the OFBiz community) that sort of thing is counter-productive. I know the
authors of both of those projects
On Jan 20, 2011, at 11:08 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Thu, 1/20/11, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote:
On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:52 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Two new projects were started - OpenTaps and Moqui.
Speaking personally (and I stress personally - I'm not
speaking on behalf
The CustRequest and related entities are designed for this. No reason to adapt
something almost entirely unrelated.
-David
On Jan 18, 2011, at 6:16 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
There is a return order process that could maybe be adapted
Jacques
From: Balasubramaniam Mohan
This is something that needs to be considered. For plain HTTP these files will
often be cached, but there are some exceptions to that. For HTTPS these files
are generally not cached.
-David
On Dec 18, 2010, at 6:00 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Don't worry it's cached in browser cache
You can do a nested query using the EntityWhereClause condition, just mix it in
with other conditions you need as part of your condition tree. It won't be part
of the entity definition, but rather the code that does the query.
-David
On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:55 PM, Prashant Punekar wrote:
Sorry, it's EntityWhereString, not EntityWhereClause.
-David
On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:49 PM, David E Jones wrote:
You can do a nested query using the EntityWhereClause condition, just mix it
in with other conditions you need as part of your condition tree. It won't be
part of the entity
In OFBiz .xml and .ftl files don't generally go into the database. If you are
saving them and not seeing anything updated in a currently running OFBiz
instance then it is probably due to cache settings (ie the caches are set to
never expire for production mode, instead of the default for
Yes, there are a few libraries that can combine PDFs (iText is another one),
and there is another option too: combine the XSL:FO files before the FOP
rendering to a single PDF file. To do that you'll have to create your own
decorator that allows for multiple page sequences, and so on. I had
Which cookie(s) are you looking at that caused these alarms?
This may or may not be OFBiz related. For example Tomcat (or whatever servlet
container you are using) manages the session cookies.
-David
On Dec 6, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Frein Mccain wrote:
I've developed an application on OFBiz and
On Oct 20, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 21/10/2010, at 10:39 AM, James McGill wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:08 AM, BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net wrote:
Not sure why it worked in derby mode but not in postgresql.
but it hung up on the tenant entity.
but adding the tenant
On Oct 18, 2010, at 9:43 AM, CallMeAndy wrote:
I am sure I read somewhere that OfBiz was a solution that would reove the
neccesity of IT staff.
That statement is a joke.
Yes, that does sound like a joke. Do you recall who the comedian is?
I suppose in general unless you stick with
1 - 100 of 1300 matches
Mail list logo