Re: [Spark on YARN] Multiple Auxiliary Shuffle Service Versions

2016-01-06 Thread Deenar Toraskar
Hi guys 1. >> Add this jar to the classpath of all NodeManagers in your cluster. A related question on configuration of the auxillary shuffle service. *How do i find the classpath for NodeManager?* I tried finding all places where the existing mapreduce shuffle jars are present and place

Re: [Spark on YARN] Multiple Auxiliary Shuffle Service Versions

2015-10-06 Thread Steve Loughran
On 6 Oct 2015, at 01:23, Andrew Or > wrote: Both the history server and the shuffle service are backward compatible, but not forward compatible. This means as long as you have the latest version of history server / shuffle service running in

Re: [Spark on YARN] Multiple Auxiliary Shuffle Service Versions

2015-10-06 Thread Alex Rovner
Thank you all for your help. *Alex Rovner* *Director, Data Engineering * *o:* 646.759.0052 * * On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > On 6 Oct 2015, at 01:23, Andrew Or wrote: > > Both the history

Re: [Spark on YARN] Multiple Auxiliary Shuffle Service Versions

2015-10-06 Thread Andreas Fritzler
Hi Andrew, thanks a lot for the clarification! Regards, Andreas On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Andrew Or wrote: > Hi all, > > Both the history server and the shuffle service are backward compatible, > but not forward compatible. This means as long as you have the

Re: [Spark on YARN] Multiple Auxiliary Shuffle Service Versions

2015-10-05 Thread Andrew Or
Hi all, Both the history server and the shuffle service are backward compatible, but not forward compatible. This means as long as you have the latest version of history server / shuffle service running in your cluster then you're fine (you don't need multiple of them). That said, an old shuffle

Re: [Spark on YARN] Multiple Auxiliary Shuffle Service Versions

2015-10-05 Thread Alex Rovner
We are running CDH 5.4 with Spark 1.3 as our main version and that version is configured to use the external shuffling service. We have also installed Spark 1.5 and have configured it not to use the external shuffling service and that works well for us so far. I would be interested myself how to

[Spark on YARN] Multiple Auxiliary Shuffle Service Versions

2015-10-05 Thread Andreas Fritzler
Hi, I was just wondering, if it is possible to register multiple versions of the aux-services with YARN as described in the documentation: 1. In the yarn-site.xml on each node, add spark_shuffle to yarn.nodemanager.aux-services, then set

Re: [Spark on YARN] Multiple Auxiliary Shuffle Service Versions

2015-10-05 Thread Steve Loughran
> On 5 Oct 2015, at 15:59, Alex Rovner wrote: > > I have the same question about the history server. We are trying to run > multiple versions of Spark and are wondering if the history server is > backwards compatible. yes, it supports the pre-1.4 "Single attempt"

Re: [Spark on YARN] Multiple Auxiliary Shuffle Service Versions

2015-10-05 Thread Andreas Fritzler
Hi Steve, Alex, how do you handle the distribution and configuration of the spark-*-yarn-shuffle.jar on your NodeManagers if you want to use 2 different Spark versions? Regards, Andreas On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > > On 5 Oct 2015, at

Re: [Spark on YARN] Multiple Auxiliary Shuffle Service Versions

2015-10-05 Thread Alex Rovner
I have the same question about the history server. We are trying to run multiple versions of Spark and are wondering if the history server is backwards compatible. *Alex Rovner* *Director, Data Engineering * *o:* 646.759.0052 * * On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Andreas

Re: [Spark on YARN] Multiple Auxiliary Shuffle Service Versions

2015-10-05 Thread Alex Rovner
Hey Steve, Are you referring to the 1.5 version of the history server? *Alex Rovner* *Director, Data Engineering * *o:* 646.759.0052 * * On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > > On 5 Oct 2015, at 15:59, Alex Rovner

Re: [Spark on YARN] Multiple Auxiliary Shuffle Service Versions

2015-10-05 Thread Steve Loughran
> On 5 Oct 2015, at 16:48, Alex Rovner wrote: > > Hey Steve, > > Are you referring to the 1.5 version of the history server? > Yes. I should warn, however, that there's no guarantee that a history server running the 1.4 code will handle the histories of a 1.5+