Okay. I guess this is not the OO world. That was my point. This is not
OO. If you are happy with that, good. We agree!
On 11/24/05, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't agree. In the OO world it is true but here using inheritance
allow you to specify some default values
Composition and inheritance are two antithetical patterns. One of themost
important things you can do is to favor composition over (instead of)
inheritance. If they are being mixed up here, this is an architectural
nightmare.
On 11/22/05, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
So how
Composition and inheritance are fundamentally antithetical. If they are
being mixed up here, this is a design sinkhole.
On 11/22/05, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
So how would you implement composition, with inheritance, using Clay
instead of
Tiles?.
I'm a big fan of
I don't agree. In the OO world it is true but here using inheritance
allow you to specify some default values that you can override (think
about Tile). This is impossible in composition unless you have some
substitution mechanism.
On 11/24/05, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Composition and
recommend you
look at facelets
(https://facelets.dev.java.net).
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Poitras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 11:17 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [shale] Design questions
I kind of agree with you
be to implement something portal like.
Hermod
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Poitras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 5:17 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [shale] Design questions
I kind of agree with you Gary. I just love Tiles powerful features
code, and then in my view I would
test for this and act accordingly - See the destinction?
Hermod
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Poitras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 1:16 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [shale] Design questions
Hi hermod, I
: Re: [shale] Design questions
Hi hermod, I think you refer to my other post. The author just took the
same
title. Confusing he?
I totally agree with your suggestions. Not a bad idea in my mind but maybe
some architectural considerations keep developpers from doing this (tied
to
jsp instead
Subject: Re: [shale] Design questions
I see. I think most of the time you're right. But in some complex situations
a tradeoff *might* be better, instead of having a lot of bloating views, you
put the logic in the backing bean. Of course, there are always ways of
reorganizing your code like by using JSP
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Poitras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 11:17 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [shale] Design questions
I kind of agree with you Gary. I just love Tiles powerful features and I
would like to use it in my JSF
On 11/23/05, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok the problem with Rolodex seems fixed in today build :) But my french
translation doesn't seem to be there (I can't find the file).
Craig just committed it about an hour ago, and it will show up in the
20051124 nightly build.
Hi
Thanks for your clarification Craig. So, if I read you correct, Tiles and
Clay
go hand in hand. Use Tiles for assembling the pages, so that you only have to
write jsp/html files containing the specific content (not the whole page).
Then
use Clay to do the work writing of the
Is it possible to develop Shale application using Java Studio Creator?
Oma.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
] Design questions
On 11/21/05, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
First of all, congratz on the good job. Shale looks very promising. We are
currently implementing JSF in my organization. I already knew about Shale
but I hadn't checked its progress in a while and I must say I am
Thank for the advices Craig . I'll do some pratical experiments with Shale
now. By the wat, I have found an interesting post on Sun Java forums about
backing beans design. Here's the link in case some other users are
interested in the subject :
Subject: Re: [shale] Design questions
On 11/21/05, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
First of all, congratz on the good job. Shale looks very promising. We are
currently implementing JSF in my organization. I already knew about Shale
but I hadn't checked its progress in a while
Is it possible to develop Shale using Java Studio Creator?
Oma
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Craig
McClanahan
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 6:15 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [shale] Design questions
On 11/21/05, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
First of all
On 11/22/05, Nwokoma, Sampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to develop Shale using Java Studio Creator?
Oma
At this point, the application models supported by Shale and Creator 2 are
similar but not identical. You'll find that Creator's page beans are very
similar in functionality
Craig,
Thank you a lot for your reply. I respect you a lot so it is with all
due respect that I asking this: why crave out an entire new framework as
shale when JSF should have been extended to take care of whatever shale
represents. I am learning shale, and I am grudging about having to code
the
,
David
-Original Message-
From: Nwokoma, Sampson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 12:16 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Cc: mailto:craigmcc@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [shale] Design questions
Craig,
Thank you a lot for your reply. I respect you a lot so
List
Subject: RE: [shale] Design questions
Oma,
If you are having trouble coding tags, which suggests you are using
Shale's Clay feature, you might want to check out
Facelets which has similar display properties to CLay. The URL is
https://facelets.dev.java.net and I found it much
easier to learn
, which is an integrated development
environment.
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: Nwokoma, Sampson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 12:35 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [shale] Design questions
David,
What is the difference between Java
On 11/22/05, Nwokoma, Sampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig,
Thank you a lot for your reply. I respect you a lot so it is with all
due respect that I asking this: why crave out an entire new framework as
shale when JSF should have been extended to take care of whatever shale
represents.
Where can I get a good tutorial on Shale?
Oma
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, November 22, 2005 1:24 pm, Craig McClanahan said:
For the long term, I absolutely agree with you ... and Shale will
certainly
serve as good research and development for what should be standardized
in
JSF 2.0.
Craig, that's an interesting comment, and I'd like to ask you to expand on
On 11/22/05, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, November 22, 2005 1:24 pm, Craig McClanahan said:
For the long term, I absolutely agree with you ... and Shale will
certainly
serve as good research and development for what should be standardized
in
JSF 2.0.
Craig,
Thanks Craig, your comments will help in my deliberations at the moment, I
appreciate you taking the time to reply :)
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM: fzammetti
Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, November 22,
Personally, I think that would be a great idea :-). However, I would
suggest
a slight terminology change, because every Shale app is also JSF
specific.
It would be more an issue of do you want to use the Shale value add
features *in addition to* those of pure JSF.
Yes! Yes! You got it correct
On 11/22/05, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a Struts project, once Shale gets to a General Availablility release
(which *definitely* won't be true for at least the first few milestones), it
will share the Struts community passion for backwards compatibility.
However, even today,
Hi
So how would you implement composition, with inheritance, using Clay instead
of
Tiles?.
I'm a big fan of Tiles and think that Clay and Tiles have their own niches. I
see tiles as a tool for assembling page fragments in a reusable way. Clay is at
a more granular level. It's focus is
I kind of agree with you Gary. I just love Tiles powerful features and I
would like to use it in my JSF application (but I would take a deep look at
Tapestry way of doing it to see if it is truly necessary). Anyway, I started
to have concerns after watching the JavaOne 2005 presentation Extreme
, 2005 4:05 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [shale] Design questions
Composition is a preferred design instead of inheritance. So, implementing
composition, with inheritance does not make much sense.
On 11/22/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
So how would you
them self, utilizing Clay
component definitions and their corresponding jsfid's in those pages.
Hermod
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 11:49 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [shale] Design questions
Hi
Hi
That should of course read: Thanks for your clarification -Gary- Sorry !
Hermod
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 6:25 AM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: RE: [shale] Design questions
Hi
Thanks for your
List
Subject: Re: [shale] Design questions
I kind of agree with you Gary. I just love Tiles powerful features and I
would like to use it in my JSF application (but I would take a deep look at
Tapestry way of doing it to see if it is truly necessary). Anyway, I started
to have concerns after watching
be to implement something portal like.
Hermod
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Poitras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 5:17 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [shale] Design questions
I kind of agree with you Gary. I just love Tiles powerful features and I
Hi!
First of all, congratz on the good job. Shale looks very promising. We are
currently implementing JSF in my organization. I already knew about Shale
but I hadn't checked its progress in a while and I must say I am impressed
so far. Actually, I stumbled upon the project while I was looking for
On 11/21/05, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
First of all, congratz on the good job. Shale looks very promising. We are
currently implementing JSF in my organization. I already knew about Shale
but I hadn't checked its progress in a while and I must say I am impressed
so far.
39 matches
Mail list logo
