From Beg-inner:
I posted about those about those Vid tuts on the RS Site...
Mark was the only one that saw my post (or replied I should say=)
Well, I just looked over my email... and looked and looked, did´t find it...
and then I saw it!
So it hasn´t mysteriously disappeared, I just didn´t see
I've been using RS a long time, albeit not quite as long as Mark -
just since V2 on Amiga - but like Mark, the way that RS works fits
me just right (even though I'm not as active as I used to be, I
still get the occasional idea for a pic and manage to 'dribble' out
a few new pics each year.)
Sure you´re right, but somehow that´s the whole point, right?
If Realsoft is basically just two people - and this proves to be not enough -
than it should be checked if other options are available.
And this just roughly correlates to the price of the product.
If the expenses are doubled and so
It's not about how much you gain money, it's about how much you spend.
RS is still around because they kept the spending low.
What you are kind of saying Martin is that you would favor a software
based on it's users/community/popularity over the software itself.
In 10 years RS will still be
I hope that the new development includes some ones of my old ideas which i have
tried to offer for realsoft (i am not sure that did they have lisened me i hope
that they have).
And those ideas/things are: Polygon faces brush cloning tool (with reflective
cloning) which would also take care of
Hi Juha,
About the cloth and other simulation software, I agree. Carlo should have
released the software many months ago, or at least hand over the software to
RS for integrating it.
Not sure what holds Carlo back..
Robert
Van: owner-l...@light.realsoft3d.com
