On Sunday 11 December 2005 07:34, Rob Landley wrote:
On Friday 09 December 2005 12:39, Antoine Martin wrote:
Is this glibc? Any ideas?
Yes, I see that on Debian Sarge too. Don't ask me why fsck uses thread,
but it seems to do that.
I wasn't even thinking about that! So true, why
On Thursday 08 December 2005 03:10, Antoine Martin wrote:
All,
Talking about tty logging and fake ide reminded of the current state of
UML on 2.4 kernels:
http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/uml-2.4.32-bs2.patch.bz2
Is Blaisorblade's 2.4.28-bs2 patch tweaked to apply cleanly on 2.4.32.
There should be
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 17:47 +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Thursday 08 December 2005 03:10, Antoine Martin wrote:
All,
Talking about tty logging and fake ide reminded of the current state of
UML on 2.4 kernels:
http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/uml-2.4.32-bs2.patch.bz2
Is Blaisorblade's
On Sunday 11 December 2005 20:19, Antoine Martin wrote:
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 17:47 +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Thursday 08 December 2005 03:10, Antoine Martin wrote:
All,
Talking about tty logging and fake ide reminded of the current state of
UML on 2.4 kernels:
I have no idea what I've done different!
I was using mrproper, but I've scripted the whole thing to test all the
combinations from scratch again (with a brand new tree each time - not
just mrproper) and the error only occurs when using the hardened gcc,
and I'm not too bothered about that (it's
