Hi,
I am Naman Muley. I am currently running on Linux Mint. I require to run
UML to simulate a network. I tried to work according to the steps given in:
http://uml.devloop.org.uk/howto.html
I did the following:
./kernel32-2.6.35.4 ubda=./Ubuntu-NattyNarwhal-i386-root_fs
and i got
Just curious. Are you running UML on Natty? I had some issues with UML
on natty because of the gcc version. Are you using gcc 4.5? If you
are, can you try compiling the UML kernel with 4.4 and try again? It
can be easily done specifying the path to the gcc-4.4 binary with the
CC parameter to make
This is a thread I created at linuxquestions about the problem.
Perhaps it could be the solution to yours.
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-kernel-70/uml-exit-code-134-a-877527/
--
EditLive Enterprise is the
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Edmundo Carmona eantor...@gmail.com wrote:
trust me I tried on Fedora and Opensuse! Been getting the same error. Can
you suggest any file system? I mean is there a dependency between the main
kernel that I use and my original distro with the one I use with UML?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Edmundo Carmona eantor...@gmail.comwrote:
But I ran UML once, a couple of weeks back, It worked. So i left it there
thinking this was ready when I needed to work on it. And now it aint
opening. Even that time, I remember I tried a couple of times before I got
the
On 06/08/2011 10:18 PM, Edmundo Carmona wrote:
Just curious. Are you running UML on Natty? I had some issues with UML
on natty because of the gcc version. Are you using gcc 4.5? If you
are, can you try compiling the UML kernel with 4.4 and try again? It
can be easily done specifying the path
Ok
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Naman Muley naman.g.mu...@gmail.comwrote:
Okay, I made a fresh attempt. Here's wat I did:
./linux-2.6.22-rc2 ubda=Slackware-12.2-root_fs
and here's what I got:
Core dump limits :
soft - 0
hard - NONE
Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
Okay, I made a fresh attempt. Here's wat I did:
./linux-2.6.22-rc2 ubda=Slackware-12.2-root_fs
(snip)
Apologies for posting the whole thing. Is it fine?
It's absolutely fine.
One more thing. This was what I got the second time. the first time I had
some errors saying device out of
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.ukwrote:
Okay, I made a fresh attempt. Here's wat I did:
./linux-2.6.22-rc2 ubda=Slackware-12.2-root_fs
(snip)
Apologies for posting the whole thing. Is it fine?
It's absolutely fine.
One more thing. This was what
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Edmundo Carmona eantor...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a thread I created at linuxquestions about the problem.
Perhaps it could be the solution to yours.
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-kernel-70/uml-exit-code-134-a-877527/
Hey, I check out that
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Naman Muley naman.g.mu...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Edmundo Carmona eantor...@gmail.comwrote:
This is a thread I created at linuxquestions about the problem.
Perhaps it could be the solution to yours.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Naman Muley naman.g.mu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, I check out that thread. It containted a link to a HOWTO webpage. I
followed it (http://hanez.org/howto-user-mode-linux.html). Here's what I
got. After spending more than 7 hours at this, I think there seems to be a
On 06/09/2011 12:25 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk wrote:
It seems this version (2.6.35.x) is broken, I'll try to rebuild it, in
the meantime the other versions seem to work ok for me.
I guess the kernel image is
naman-mint@naman-mint-laptop ~/uml/linux-2.6.23.13 $
First, use something more recent.
FYI: I've just checked the instructions I posted here:
http://uml.devloop.org.uk/howto.html
And all the kernels on there now run ok.
So, you should be able to get UML running in 5 easy steps.
Cheers
Antoine
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:04:51PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
Thanks, this looks good compiles, so:
Acked-by: Ralf Baechle r...@linux-mips.org
I will rebase my pending MIPS audit patches on top of this patch and resend.
Thanks,
Ralf
On 06/07, Eric Paris wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 19:19 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
With or without this patch, can't we call audit_syscall_exit() twice
if there is something else in _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_EXIT mask apart from
SYSCALL_AUDIT ? First time it is called from asm, then from
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 18:36 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 06/07, Eric Paris wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 19:19 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
With or without this patch, can't we call audit_syscall_exit() twice
if there is something else in _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_EXIT mask apart from
On 06/08, Eric Paris wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 18:36 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
And I guess, all CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL code in entry.S is only needed to
microoptimize the case when TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT is the only reason for the
slow path. I wonder if it really makes the measureble
On 06/08, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
OK. Thanks a lot Eric for your explanations.
Yes. but may I ask another one?
Shouldn't copy_process()-audit_alloc(tsk) path do
clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT) if it doesn't
set tsk-audit_context?
I can be easily wrong, but afaics otherwise the
20 matches
Mail list logo