Re: Best practice for storing configuration data

2005-04-18 Thread Simone-dev
Great, I like the idea of storing data inside the server.xml or using the admin tool... using the Environment tag... if you have access to the adminstration of the server unfortunately this doesn't work if you just have access to you context directory... From what I read on all the thread

User Certificates and application managed security -- possible??

2005-04-18 Thread Tom Bednarz
Hi, We have a customer who is introducing chip cards with client-certificates for single sign on. Because of this I have to change a web-application we provided. The application implements its own security mechanisms and uses roles (defined for every action in struts-config.xml) and roles in

RE: User Certificates and application managed security -- possibl e??

2005-04-18 Thread Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21)
Hi With a newer Tomcat you might use a solution similar to what I have already seen in a WebLogic-installation: Several security-providers were created and configured. The first one to able to authenticate the user does the job. Therefor the first would be an authenticator that can handle the

[OT] Steps for Configuring WAS 5.0 Websphere MQ

2005-04-18 Thread Prasenjit Narwade
The requirement is, I need a Message Driven Bean which will recieve messages from Websphere MQ. I am finding problems doing the configuration in WSAD as well as in WAS. Any pointers to Configuring for MDB - MQ in (1) WSAD 5.1 and (2) WAS 5.0 will be really helpful. Thanks in advance,

Actions and Action Mappings instantiated once?

2005-04-18 Thread Néstor Boscán
Hi When I create a struts-config.xml that has many nodes that call the same action class, is the action class instantietad once, or is instantiated for every node?. What happens if I have a custom action mapping class, is instantiated once or is instantiated for every node?. Regards, Néstor

Use of frames and security softwares in browser

2005-04-18 Thread Antony Paul
Hi all, I plan to use frames for a site where in the user will feel that he is one site while it will be pulling content from another site. Here my question is will any kind of security software installed in a browser will detect this and report to the user or prevent the content from being

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException calling an Action

2005-04-18 Thread Rodolfo García Esteban/CYII
Hi all, I'm developing with struts 1.2.4, I have an action with form as beans, not dynamic, field in which I introduce data are String, and I have another field without values. When I do commit, then programs doesn't touch my action I obtain befere the next error:

RE: Actions and Action Mappings instantiated once?

2005-04-18 Thread Freddy Villalba A.
Hello, Nestor. I'm not sure what you mean exactly by node. Anyway, according to Struts' online doc: Write code for a multi-threaded environment - The controller servlet creates only one instance of your Action class, and uses this one instance to service all requests... Not sure if this is what

AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Dakota Jack
I have been taking another look at the AJAX stuff that Frank Zammetti has provided. This stuff is revolutionary. Someone ought to be taking a close look at integrating such solutions, so far as it makes sense, into Struts. This is not a passing fancy, in my estimation. This is a real solution

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Rodolfo García Esteban/CYII
Where do we find information about this marvellous stuff? Rodolfo __ Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18/04/2005 15:02 Por favor, responda a Struts Users Mailing List Para: Struts Users Mailing List user@struts.apache.org cc: (cco: Rodolfo

Re: Actions and Action Mappings instantiated once?

2005-04-18 Thread Joe Germuska
At 6:48 AM -0400 4/18/05, Néstor Boscán wrote: Hi When I create a struts-config.xml that has many nodes that call the same action class, is the action class instantietad once, or is instantiated for every node?. What happens if I have a custom action mapping class, is instantiated once or is

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Stéphane Zuckerman
Dakota Jack a écrit : This is a fundamental shift in architecture that makes clear sense. I tend to agree with you, and if this were to be integrated in Struts, my life would be easier (I am using AJAX stuff in some parts of my webapp). However, I have a serious concern related to security :

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Stéphane Zuckerman
Rodolfo García Esteban/CYII a écrit : Where do we find information about this marvellous stuff? Rodolfo __ Look for XMLHttpRequest and/or ActiveXObject(Microsoft.XMLHTTP) XML.com and the Apple dev center have good introductory articles about it. Basically, this is a

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Dakota Jack
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/AjaxStruts On 4/18/05, Rodolfo García Esteban/CYII [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where do we find information about this marvellous stuff? Rodolfo __ Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18/04/2005 15:02 Por favor, responda a Struts Users

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Dakota Jack
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/AjaxStruts On 4/18/05, Stéphane Zuckerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rodolfo García Esteban/CYII a écrit : Where do we find information about this marvellous stuff? Rodolfo __ Look for XMLHttpRequest and/or

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Dakota Jack
Good overview, Stephane On 4/18/05, Stéphane Zuckerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rodolfo García Esteban/CYII a écrit : Where do we find information about this marvellous stuff? Rodolfo __ Look for XMLHttpRequest and/or ActiveXObject(Microsoft.XMLHTTP)

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Hubert Rabago
For articles, blogs, libraries, etc, related to this technology, take a look at http://www.ajaxmatters.com/ Our own Frank wrote an article about using it on http://www.omnytex.com/articles/xhrstruts/ He also proposed integrating the technology with the Struts taglibs:

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Vic Cekvenich (netsql)
Stéphane Zuckerman wrote: if this were to be integrated in Struts, my life would be easier. I too will now check it out. .V - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Woodchuck
eee... javascript... yuck, ptooey! ptooey!! --- Vic Cekvenich (netsql) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stéphane Zuckerman wrote: if this were to be integrated in Struts, my life would be easier. I too will now check it out. .V

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
On 4/6 I posted the following message to the Struts dev list... I can't seem to find the thread in the list archives, if anyone else can I would appreciate very much you posting the link to it... This was discussing my proposal for integrating AJAX functionality into the existing Struts taglibs.

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
ptooey... I've always wanted to know how to spell that :) -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com On Mon, April 18, 2005 10:29 am, Woodchuck said: eee... javascript... yuck, ptooey! ptooey!! --- Vic Cekvenich (netsql)

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Hubert Rabago
Frank, You must've started typing this response a while ago. I already sent a message on this thread linking to the dev email with your proposal. Hubert On 4/18/05, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/6 I posted the following message to the Struts dev list... I can't seem to find

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Yep, sorry about that... I had it in my drafts folder because I got called away in the middle of it, and I didn't check all the replies to the current thread before sending it so I didn't see your link until afterwards. My bad :) -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Dakota Jack
JavaScript provides a client side rather developed engine in JavaScript as well as Flash, etc. This is merely a resource. The yuck, ptooey! ptooey response to these ideas, especially ones in production and successful for quite a while, strikes me as rather less than professional. I think it is

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Emmanouil Batsis
Let me first say that IMHO, introducing AJAX capabilities into the html taglib is an awesome idea. Frank W. Zammetti wrote: So, the question is, does anyone see this as something interesting? Very. I was also thinking about working on AJAX taglibs using Sarissa [1] (introductory article at

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Woodchuck
sorry, i couldn't resist . actually, why don't we address this problem at the source rather than using this javascript patch solution? (at least this is how i see it) why don't the browser makers build internal mechanisms to allow posting of forms without the need to refresh the html page? why

html:link and html:cancel

2005-04-18 Thread Abdullah Jibaly
Hi all, Is there a way to use html:link in a way that it acts like html:cancel, in other words automatically skip validation? This seems to work but I wonder if there is a better way? jsp:useBean id=paramMap class=java.util.HashMap / c:set target=${paramMap}

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Benedict, Paul C
Frank, will Ajax support be tied into reporting form errors? It would be interesting to break down the validator into individual validations, so errors can be reported to the user as he types. -Original Message- From: Emmanouil Batsis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 18,

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Dakota Jack
Not sure what to say, Woodchuck, about your suggestion that a request be sent that does not want a response and does not affect the HTML page. What would happen next? And, how? This is perfectly conceivable. Heck, I think that it might be possible as is. But, I don't see this as even

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Hubert Rabago
No problemo. As far as the extension itself is concerned, I'd still be interested in it, but like I mentioned earlier, only as a plugin that doesn't change the base tags. The reasons are many and they are mentioned in the dev thread you started. My main concern is implementation lock-in.

RE: [OT] For Struts or Sports Lovers

2005-04-18 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
Might have helped to have a guest login guest/guest123 -- Peter Pilgrim Operations/IT - Credit Suisse First Boston, Floor 15, 5 Canada Square, London E14 4QJ, United Kingdom Tel: +44-(0)207-883-4497 -Original Message- From: t t [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 April 2005 17:21

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Dakota Jack
SNIP On 4/18/05, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or we could just use ActiveX controls. *psych!* /SNIP Or JavaScript, or Applets, or Flash, or .. but, most importantly, in this thread, AJAX with STRUTS. Jack -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it

Re: Dispatch Action Strangeness

2005-04-18 Thread David Johnson
Any further insights on this? It seems I'm missing something simple here... I dont want ot have to manually call methods on my action... help? :) Is there something beyond the html:hidden property=dispatch value=error/ that I need (and the hidden field named dispatch) and of course to have

example using validations with nested tags

2005-04-18 Thread kjc
Does anyone know of any examples using the struts validation framework with the nested tags. Thanks in advance. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

html:multibox

2005-04-18 Thread Riyaz Mansoor
hi reading from past postings this subject has been much talked about. but not finding a solution to my liking i post this question. i want a user a see a set of checkboxes some selected some not. the user is allowed to check uncheck anyone of them. upon form submission, i want the value of the

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
On Mon, April 18, 2005 11:12 am, Emmanouil Batsis said: I haven't really studied the samples yet, but it would seem more semantically correct to me if the html:form was used to make this work. I'll try to come up with more concrete suggestions. I thought of that too, but what changed my mind

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Interesting... honestly, I hadn't thought about it! I think you kind of touch on one of the points made in the dev list thread (by Martin I believe) that was cited as a reason not to go with my proposal: is it flexible enough? Certainly it would be next to impossible to cover ever usage pattern,

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
On Mon, April 18, 2005 11:33 am, Hubert Rabago said: No problemo. As far as the extension itself is concerned, I'd still be interested in it, but like I mentioned earlier, only as a plugin that doesn't change the base tags. I thought that was a fair point at the time, and still do. I haven't

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Jason King
Woodchuck wrote: As soon as IE becomes open source we can start that. Until then, or until IE's market share drops into single digits we're forced to deal with browsers as a given. Besides, much of the visceral dislike for javascript is based on older browsers that were not at all consistend.

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Users that turn off JS are akin, in my mind, to automobile drivers who decide they would rather play Fred Flintstone, cut holes in the floorboards and not bother starting the engine. Oh, you'll get around, but your missing out! While I am certainly not trying to say there aren't very legitimate

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Javascript hasn't been a problem as far as cross-browser development goes for some time, in my experience anyway. I can't remember the last time I wrote code that worked on one browser and not another. Oh wait, I take that back... I remember something about IE's substring method not working like

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Benedict, Paul C
To Frank's point, I am sometimes one of those users who turn off JavaScript ;-) But, it's a moot point, because, as I see it, no one's website should depend on JavaScript for it to be fully functional anymore than it should wholly rely on CSS. These are technologies that enable powerful

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Fogleson, Allen
But windows (at least in it's newest form - XP) doesn't ship with fdisk anymore :) (Heck the way windows is going pretty soon you wont be able to format either except at install time) Al -Original Message- From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005

Re: Dispatch Action Strangeness

2005-04-18 Thread Jeff Beal
Are you overriding execute() in either your Action or BaseAction? On 4/18/05, David Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any further insights on this? It seems I'm missing something simple here... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
But, it's a moot point, because, as I see it, no one's website should depend on JavaScript for it to be fully functional anymore than it should wholly rely on CSS. I would have to respectfully disagree Paul. While I think it's right to say that not EVERYONE'S web site should require these

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Joe Germuska
At 11:15 AM -0400 4/18/05, Benedict, Paul C wrote: Frank, will Ajax support be tied into reporting form errors? It would be interesting to break down the validator into individual validations, so errors can be reported to the user as he types. Independent of Ajax, Niall Pemberton has done a

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Benedict, Paul C
Frank, Thanks for your respectful rebuttal. My statement was pretty general and a wide-range of exceptions exist for it, but I think we actually agree at the end of the day when the whole picture painted. You're right to draw the distinction between a SITE and APPLICATION, and sometimes

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Benedict, Paul C
Joe writes: Otherwise, Paul, I'm not sure what you mean... is your idea that an XMLHttpRequest call would be made to do server-side validation for each form update? The overhead is likely to make that an impractical solution. Or are you wondering how errors would be reported back to the

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
You are correct Joe, I made no attempt whatsoever to solve that situation. In short (relatively!), for anyone trying to get a grasp on it, my proposal boils down to this: We have these Struts tags that everyone (except ironically me, most of the time!) uses. These tags have various event

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Joe Germuska
At 1:59 PM -0400 4/18/05, Benedict, Paul C wrote: Joe writes: Otherwise, Paul, I'm not sure what you mean... is your idea that an XMLHttpRequest call would be made to do server-side validation for each form update? The overhead is likely to make that an impractical solution. Or are you

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
On Mon, April 18, 2005 2:13 pm, Joe Germuska said: I am not quite sure why the overhead makes it impractical, unless there is a physical barrier such as bandwidth restraint -- but that sounds like a case-by-case decision is required. Well, by definition, an XMLHttpRequest involves a

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Michael J.
This is all great, and ajax definetely rules, but is it OK to use other's pictures without giving credit to their author, who by the way, came up with this name: http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000385.php

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Your right, and I suggest we stop using the AJAX name lest someone get sued... Might I suggest WOINA? (W)hat's (O)ld (I)s (N)ew (A)gain. -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com On Mon, April 18, 2005 2:29 pm, Michael J. said: This

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread DGraham
What? Michael J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/18/2005 02:29 PM Please respond to Struts Users Mailing List user@struts.apache.org To Struts Users Mailing List user@struts.apache.org cc Subject Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie! This is all great, and ajax definetely rules, but is it OK to use other's

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Jason King
Now, you raise a good point as to how the Javascript could capitalize on the presence of the errorStyle attribute, which normally is only interpreted on page load. That is, if you did any client side validation, you'd probably like to be able to switch the style of the invalid field to

Re: Dispatch Action Strangeness

2005-04-18 Thread Hubert Rabago
IIRC you wanted the graph method to be called because you had set('graph') in an onclick handler. What does the set('graph') method do? Does it modify the dispatch form field? On 4/18/05, David Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any further insights on this? It seems I'm missing something simple

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Jason King
Frank, What do we need extra tags for? We already have hooks to call javascript functions, whether those functions run 100% client-side or interact through an xmlhttp object or even through a 1x1 pixel iframe should be totally unknown to the individual input elements. Frank W. Zammetti wrote:

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Gnther Wieser
hi, after all the mail about the philosophical aspects of AJAX (javascript yes/no, etc.) i want to contribute that THIS IS THE SOLUTION i've been looking for for one of my current projects. so, do i want to have that in struts? YES, I WANT! where can i sign? frank, if i would pray my next

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Dakota Jack
Yes. I agree with this wholeheartedly. I wish we would do something similar with the application specific code that is now in Struts. Plugins would not be the solution, but something akin to that. On 4/18/05, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No problemo. As far as the extension itself

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Gnther Wieser
...and some very simple questions, i hope i didn't pass the answers in all the mails about ajax: - where can i get it (especially the struts extension, or was it just a proposal)? - if it is under development, is there a chance to get a snapshot and to contribute to the development? kr, guenther

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Forget whatever I was thinking, I think Jason is on the right track! Ironically, I add custom attributes all the time in numerous situations, but it frankly escaped me as a possible solution here. All you really need beyond this is probably a new tag that renders a JS function that you can pass

RE: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
http://www.omnytex.com/ajaxtags.zip is everything I have. It is, I'd say, partially real... There are some things I didn't do (most importantly the reading in of the configuration file), but it is a real, working thing there, mostly. It certainly needs to be completed, but ultimately in simplest

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
You lost me Jason... what extra tags are you referring to? My proposal specifically didn't require any new tags, only additions to the existing ones. -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com On Mon, April 18, 2005 2:43 pm, Jason King

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Dakota Jack
Thanks tor this note. Attribution supplied. You might have done that yourself. On 4/18/05, Michael J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is all great, and ajax definetely rules, but is it OK to use other's pictures without giving credit to their author, who by the way, came up with this name:

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Dakota Jack
There is no problem using the name. That is the name the people at Adaptive Path want used. It is not the name for a product. It is the name for a technology and there is no problem with being sued. You can just AJAX all you want. The name is clean, but not cleanser. ///;-) Jack On

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Michael J.
From wiki: No one should be under the impression that you have to deal in XML or that you have to use the XMLHttpRequest object at all, contrary to the meaning of the AJAX moniker. Not that I really care about the name, but for me you do not use Ajax if you do not use async HTTP calls, either

Re: Dispatch Action Strangeness

2005-04-18 Thread David Johnson
yes, exactly. If changed the value of the hidden field to graph That part is working too. If I do a log.debug (dispatch=+theForm.getDispatch()); it puts out the right value (graph or whatever I clicked in the form) On 4/18/05, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IIRC you wanted the graph

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Jason King
Frank W. Zammetti wrote: You lost me Jason... what extra tags are you referring to? My proposal specifically didn't require any new tags, only additions to the existing ones. You previously said: why not just modify the existing Struts tags to have some at least minimal AJAX functionality?

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Dakota Jack
I think you might be misunderstanding this point. And, I would invite Frank, when he gets time to explain it to you. Jack On 4/18/05, Michael J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From wiki: No one should be under the impression that you have to deal in XML or that you have to use the XMLHttpRequest

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Oh, *that* part of it I agree has to be there or we're talking about something completely different. It was the usage of XML that isn't required, that was my point in writing that. -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com On Mon,

Re: Dispatch Action Strangeness

2005-04-18 Thread DGraham
You've confirm that you've changed the action-mapping so that it is now using your new dispatch action? If that's correct, then I'd say you need to break at DispatchAction.execute() and step through it to see what's going on. Dennis David Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/18/2005 03:28 PM

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Ah, I see. In any case this doesn't require new tags. Part of this is I'm not just talking about validation. In fact I think that's about the most pedestrian use of AJAX around! It's the cooler kind of things you can get away with like table sorting, like the example in my article. Not that

Re: Dispatch Action Strangeness

2005-04-18 Thread Hubert Rabago
One part I missed was when you said your base action is extending DispatchAction. What is it that your base action is doing? It could be conflicting with the dispatch logic. Hubert On 4/18/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You've confirm that you've changed the action-mapping so

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
I should probably post this on the Wiki, but... AJAX is just a new buzzword for an old concept: updating only portions of a web page instead of everything at once. Speaking for myself, I was doing what would now be called AJAX at least five years ago, and I'm talking about in a production app.

Re: Dispatch Action Strangeness

2005-04-18 Thread Dave Newton
David Johnson wrote: yes, exactly. If changed the value of the hidden field to graph That part is working too. If I do a log.debug (dispatch=+theForm.getDispatch()); it puts out the right value (graph or whatever I clicked in the form) What does the code for your base action (that subclasses

Re: Dispatch Action Strangeness

2005-04-18 Thread David Johnson
yeah. this is my Action mapping action path=/PortfolioSummaryAction name=portfolioSummaryForm scope=request input=page.portfolioSummary type=com.foo.struts.PortfolioSummaryAction parameter=dispatch forward name=success path=page.portfolio.summary redirect=true/ forward name=invalidSession

Re: Dispatch Action Strangeness

2005-04-18 Thread David Johnson
the BaseAction has import org.apache.commons.logging.Log; import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory; private Log log; and a constructor that initialized the log object so I can perform logging in all my actions. In addition it has a checkAuth() method that makes sure the user is logged in

Re: Dispatch Action Strangeness

2005-04-18 Thread Hubert Rabago
Does it have an execute() method? If so, what does the execute method do? Hubert On 4/18/05, David Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the BaseAction has import org.apache.commons.logging.Log; import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory; private Log log; and a constructor that

Re: Dispatch Action Strangeness

2005-04-18 Thread Dave Newton
Hubert Rabago wrote: Does it have an execute() method? If so, what does the execute method do? Yeah--what you gave isn't enough. In order to diagnose we must see the code, because on the surface everything appears to be fine. Dave

Re: Dispatch Action Strangeness

2005-04-18 Thread David Johnson
which part to you need to see? I'm s thankful for any help :) On 4/18/05, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hubert Rabago wrote: Does it have an execute() method? If so, what does the execute method do? Yeah--what you gave isn't enough. In order to diagnose we must see the

Re: Dispatch Action Strangeness

2005-04-18 Thread Dave Newton
David Johnson wrote: which part to you need to see? I'm s thankful for any help :) All of it? What Hubert is asking is whether or not you override the execute method of the DispatchAction subclass, as that could easily munge up the dispatching. That's certainly among my top questions as

binary view

2005-04-18 Thread Daniel Watrous
I have an action in my application that generates a PNG image from some text stored in a session object. My view is very simple: [EMAIL PROTECTED] contentType=image/png% % java.io.OutputStream os = response.getOutputStream(); java.awt.image.BufferedImage buffer = (java.awt.image.BufferedImage)

content management tool

2005-04-18 Thread sudip shrestha
Just curious if there are any struts based content managment tools out there! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: binary view

2005-04-18 Thread Smith, Thad
The problem is that you're opening the output stream at the beginning of your jsp and then reopening the output stream by calling response.getOutputStream(). I believe you can call response.reset() to fix this problem: % response.reset(); response.setContentType(image/png); java.io.OutputStream

Re: binary view

2005-04-18 Thread Larry Meadors
Why even bother with a jsp? You have the response object in your action, just start spewing data into it. Larry On 4/18/05, Daniel Watrous [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an action in my application that generates a PNG image from some text stored in a session object. My view is very

RE: binary view

2005-04-18 Thread Folashade Adeyosoye
This might be a good case to write a custom tag. -Original Message- From: Daniel Watrous [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:20 PM To: user@struts.apache.org Subject: binary view I have an action in my application that generates a PNG image from some text stored

Identify users

2005-04-18 Thread Yan Hu
Hi: I have a question.I need to check if a user is the one who has permission to a certain action. His role is stored in the database, for example user.isStudent. The whole student object is stored in the session after he logs in successfully . From that point on, every time he sends

Using validate() and returning to original page dynamically

2005-04-18 Thread Nic Werner
Hi again, I'm calling the validate() method in my MappingDispatchAction to check errors on page. Which is fine, except that I want to return to the URL (Action w/params) that was called. I have two Actions, Edit and Add, which both refer to Attributes.jsp, and depending on the type param

Re: AJAX: Whoa, Nellie!

2005-04-18 Thread Martin Cooper
To get beyond doing the grunt work yourself for Ajax, I recommend taking a look at this: http://dojotoolkit.org/intro_to_dojo_io.html and downloading the dojo.io package from their site. Personally, I'm not convinced that we need anything new in Struts to make using Ajax easier. I'm building