Hi,
We use apacheds as authentication storage for websphere application server
cluster.
Versions are 2.0.0.M14 and Websphere is 8.0.0.5
We run it on redhat 5.8 (x64), and apacheds is allways running on 100%... :
22014 apacheds 22 0 4391m 1.7g 10m S 109.8 10.6 200:34.23 java
Is this
Le 7/9/13 10:27 AM, Slavomir Kocka a écrit :
Hi,
We use apacheds as authentication storage for websphere application server
cluster.
Versions are 2.0.0.M14 and Websphere is 8.0.0.5
We run it on redhat 5.8 (x64), and apacheds is allways running on 100%... :
22014 apacheds 22 0 4391m
The interesting point is, that we have two servers in mirror.
Not using replication from 2.0, but doing writes separately.
and the second server is just fine... In identical JVM and same hardware...
The difference is, that websphere uses first one as main source, and second, as
spare...
Few
Hi,
I included the maven-bundle-plugin in my build and it works now. Thanks for the
quick help and explanation!
Maybe you could provide some sort of short apacheds+maven tutorial for embedded
servers on the project's website and include that bit of information.
Regards,
Klaus
Le 7/9/13 12:35 PM, Slavomir Kocka a écrit :
The interesting point is, that we have two servers in mirror.
Not using replication from 2.0, but doing writes separately.
and the second server is just fine... In identical JVM and same hardware...
The difference is, that websphere uses first one
Le 7/9/13 12:54 PM, Dorninger Klaus a écrit :
Hi,
I included the maven-bundle-plugin in my build and it works now. Thanks for
the quick help and explanation!
Maybe you could provide some sort of short apacheds+maven tutorial for
embedded servers on the project's website and include that
Thanks for response.
I'll write into your answers...
On Jul 9, 2013, at 13:33 , Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 7/9/13 12:35 PM, Slavomir Kocka a écrit :
The interesting point is, that we have two servers in mirror.
Not using replication from 2.0, but doing writes
Le 7/9/13 2:17 PM, Slavomir Kocka a écrit :
Thanks for response.
I'll write into your answers...
On Jul 9, 2013, at 13:33 , Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 7/9/13 12:35 PM, Slavomir Kocka a écrit :
The interesting point is, that we have two servers in mirror.
Not using
Ok,
Well, we are running inside VM on HDD for server usage (Guess 1 spins/s),
but I believe, there are not SSD drives.
In fact, we are using JMS to buffer writes, and simulate transactional
behaviour (in case user is not added due to any reason, JMS container rolls
back operation, and
Le 7/9/13 3:23 PM, Slavomir Kocka a écrit :
Ok,
Well, we are running inside VM on HDD for server usage (Guess 1 spins/s),
but I believe, there are not SSD drives.
In fact, we are using JMS to buffer writes, and simulate transactional
behaviour (in case user is not added due to any
Hi,
Well. We do prepare some performance tests in concurrent environment, so we
will definitely run
current and redesigned version as well. So it would be interesting to compare.
:)
Questionable is only, if to use it in production...
Is it going to be included in stable stream soon? Or is it
Le 7/9/13 5:30 PM, Slavomir Kocka a écrit :
Hi,
Well. We do prepare some performance tests in concurrent environment, so we
will definitely run
current and redesigned version as well. So it would be interesting to
compare. :)
Questionable is only, if to use it in production...
Is it
12 matches
Mail list logo
