Hi all - I know this topic is a rehash of an age old debate, whether
groupOfNames/groupOfUniqueNames should allow the member/uniquemember attributes
to be empty. Many LDAP vendors allow empty groups (all from the Netscape
lineage, CA Directory, AD) but that breaks RFC-compliance. So just from a
shouldn't be an issue, cause most of the time we inject a dummy
member/uniqueMemeber at the
time of creating an entry with groupOf(Unique)Names
and otoh, changing MUST to MAY is tolerable than the other way around
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Richard Sand rs...@idfconnect.com wrote:
Hi
