RE: [libreoffice-users] LO Conflicts with OOo

2011-10-29 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
that LO 3.y does not replace OOo 3.x, and vice versa.) - Dennis -Original Message- From: Stephan Zietsman [mailto:szi...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 05:44 To: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] LO Conflicts with OOo Harold Fuchs wrote

RE: [libreoffice-users] LO Conflicts with OOo

2011-10-29 Thread Tom Davies
:) --- On Sat, 29/10/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: From: Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] LO Conflicts with OOo To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Saturday, 29 October, 2011, 18:18 It makes perfect sense that OOo and LO could

[libreoffice-users] LO Conflicts with OOo

2011-10-27 Thread Harold Fuchs
I installed the new portable LO (http://portableapps.com/apps/office/libreoffice_portable) on a USB stick. When I try to run it, it complains that there is another copy running. It seems that this is because OpenOffice's (non-portable) Quickstarter is running on the machine. Of course, OOo's

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO Conflicts with OOo

2011-10-27 Thread Stephan Zietsman
Harold Fuchs wrote: I installed the new portable LO (http://portableapps.com/apps/office/libreoffice_portable) on a USB stick. When I try to run it, it complains that there is another copy running. It seems that this is because OpenOffice's (non-portable) Quickstarter is running on the