On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 15:05 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:50:07 -0700
James E Lang je...@lang.hm wrote:
So PC Magazine links (pcmag.com) in UK get converted to
uk.pcmag.com
and some place else they get converted to au.pcmag.com? Nasty! It's
hard to communicate that
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:11:51 -0400
Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
Hello Adam,
In order to show them more appropriate advertising!
Indeed. Although that wasn't the reason I was thinking of, it's at least
as good as, probably better.
--
Regards _
/ ) The
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:50:07 -0700
James E Lang je...@lang.hm wrote:
Hello James,
So PC Magazine links (pcmag.com) in UK get converted to uk.pcmag.com
and some place else they get converted to au.pcmag.com? Nasty! It's
hard to communicate that way. Censorship?
Unlikely. It's more likely that
2015-08-24 22:59 GMT+02:00 Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com:
Hi :)
I think it is important to get some good comments in there quickly. It
would be good to do this to any other articles about LibreOffice too.
It is best to write more comments for articles that are properly
pro-LibreOffice so
: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 9:20
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
On 20/08/15 12:20, Pedro wrote:
steveedmonds wrote
On 2015-08-19 12:55, James Knott wrote:
On 08/18/2015 07:23 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
Hi. Is this a review for LO 4? When I click on the link
On 21/08/15 11:02, Pedro wrote:
I disagree that the UI is the biggest problem...
The acid test is whether or not the UI passes or fails Section 508 criteria.
Currently, LibO fails Section 508 criteria.
(Draw fails everything. Impress fails most of the time.)
jonathon
--
To unsubscribe
2015-08-24 16:36 GMT+02:00 toki toki.kant...@gmail.com:
On 21/08/15 11:02, Pedro wrote:
I disagree that the UI is the biggest problem...
The acid test is whether or not the UI passes or fails Section 508
criteria.
Currently, LibO fails Section 508 criteria.
(Draw fails everything.
Hi :)
I got the 4.0 article from the original link too even though i'm not in the
southern hemisphere and don't have my monitor upside down either. Guess it
is another Firefox issue. Even going to the author's page and clicking on
the 5.0 link got me to the 4.0 review. Also the font size kept
Hi :)
I think it is important to get some good comments in there quickly. It
would be good to do this to any other articles about LibreOffice too.
It is best to write more comments for articles that are properly
pro-LibreOffice so that their authors get seen positively by whoever
publishes such
Nice article indeed.
I personally like the structured way of the menus. I am a long time user of
OpenOffice, and later LibreOffice.
When MS started with the ribbon, I just didn't use MS office anymore, and on my
newer systems (Mac's and PCs) I only install LO.
Recently I experienced that I
(GMT-05:00)
To: Pedro pedl...@gmail.com
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating |
PCMag.com
Nice article indeed.
I personally like the structured way of the menus. I am a long time user of
OpenOffice, and later LibreOffice.
When
steveedmonds wrote
On 2015-08-19 12:55, James Knott wrote:
On 08/18/2015 07:23 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
Hi. Is this a review for LO 4? When I click on the link I get a review
for 4.0
It says 5.0, when I click on the link.
Must be a redirect because that link takes me to
I managed to get the original article by using google translate, and
than choose to see the original language ;)
The lay-out is cluttered, but the article is readable.
https://translate.google.be/translate?hl=nlsl=entl=nlu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pcmag.com%2Farticle2%2F0%2C2817%2C2418419%2C00.aspanno=2
On 20/08/15 12:20, Pedro wrote:
steveedmonds wrote
On 2015-08-19 12:55, James Knott wrote:
On 08/18/2015 07:23 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
Hi. Is this a review for LO 4? When I click on the link I get a review
for 4.0
It says 5.0, when I click on the link.
Must be a redirect because that
14 matches
Mail list logo
