Heinrich Stoellinger píše v So 20. 07. 2013 v 17:26 +0200:
Hello,
I downloaded LO 4.1.0-RC3 yesterday. Looking at the files after tar -xvf ...
I find that there still is no desktop-integration directory in the main
installation tree of files. Is it meant to be like that?
The
'killer' features.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz
To: hc.stoellin...@aon.at
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 2 August 2013, 11:37
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] desktop-integration
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 21:13:45 +0200, Kracked_P_P---webmaster
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
On 07/27/2013 11:32 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
On 07/27/2013 08:16 AM, sun shine wrote:
On 27/07/13 15:36, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hi,
As a first installment...
- What goes wrong? Clicking on any
Hi Tom
Thanks for the heads up. Aside from some minor issues regarding
documentation and installation, it seems to work fine. Here's my
experience on Mint 14, FWIW:
The Read-Me still states:
The following commands will install LibreOffice and the desktop
integration packages (you may just
Mint 14?MATE or Cinnamon desktop environment? I run Ubuntu 12.04LTS
with MATE.
So the desktop-integration now works properly without the extra step.
Yes, the Language Pack before the Help Pack was something that I
remember hearing about back in 3.4.x days.
Has anyone installed the
Hello,
Not the rpm- but the deb-Version (32bit) on Debian-Wheezy-KDE 4.10.
IT STILL DOES NOT WORK!!!
Regards
Heinrich
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:53:23 +0200, Kracked_P_P---webmaster
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
Mint 14?MATE or Cinnamon desktop environment? I run Ubuntu 12.04LTS
with
On 27/07/13 10:53, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Mint 14?MATE or Cinnamon desktop environment? I run Ubuntu
12.04LTS with MATE.
So the desktop-integration now works properly without the extra step.
Yes, the Language Pack before the Help Pack was something that I
remember hearing
On 27/07/13 11:10, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hello,
Not the rpm- but the deb-Version (32bit) on Debian-Wheezy-KDE 4.10.
IT STILL DOES NOT WORK!!!
Regards
Heinrich
snip
Hello Heinrich
Seems like you have been experiencing difficulty with this version for
quite some time, IIRC?
However,
On 07/27/2013 03:49 AM, sun shine wrote:
snip
The language pack must be installed before the help pack - I can't
recall having to do this in a given order before, but maybe I did for
previous versions.
snip
Sorry about replying to own post, but have just seen the instruction on
the download
I've just installed 4.1 on Squeeze and no problems, although this was
using Gnome 2.* DE again.
Just a thought: if you have the space, time and patience, you could
install the Gnome DE (unless it's already installed by default?) and see
if you could install it through that DE. Or even Xfce4
On 07/27/2013 08:11 AM, sun shine wrote:
On 27/07/13 10:53, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Mint 14?MATE or Cinnamon desktop environment? I run Ubuntu
12.04LTS with MATE.
So the desktop-integration now works properly without the extra step.
Yes, the Language Pack before the Help Pack
Hi,
As a first installment...
- What goes wrong? Clicking on any of the icons for the various parts of LO
doesn't cause anything to come up. Also, there is no LibreOffice icon for
the complete package, only icons for the various parts...
- Yes, I DID delete LO befor trying to install 4.1
That is why we need to include a dependency script to help install
everything that might be missing before you install LO. Not everyone
might have all the dependencies installed. I have one Linux Distro that
would tell me a list of the dependencies needed to install the package
but would
On 27/07/13 15:36, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hi,
As a first installment...
- What goes wrong? Clicking on any of the icons for the various parts
of LO
doesn't cause anything to come up. Also, there is no LibreOffice
icon for
the complete package, only icons for the various parts...
-
On 07/27/2013 08:16 AM, sun shine wrote:
On 27/07/13 15:36, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hi,
As a first installment...
- What goes wrong? Clicking on any of the icons for the various parts
of LO
doesn't cause anything to come up. Also, there is no LibreOffice
icon for
the complete
On 07/27/2013 11:32 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
On 07/27/2013 08:16 AM, sun shine wrote:
On 27/07/13 15:36, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hi,
As a first installment...
- What goes wrong? Clicking on any of the icons for the various
parts of LO
doesn't cause anything to come up. Also, there is no
Hi :)
Now that the 4.1.0 has been properly released you might find the proper release
has all the desktop integration sorted out now. it might be worth checking if
you are keen and have the time
Good luck and regards from
Tom :)
From: Italo Vignoli
On 07/20/2013 12:21 PM, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
On 20/07/2013 at 17:26, Heinrich Stoellinger hc.stoellin...@aon.at wrote:
I downloaded LO 4.1.0-RC3 yesterday. Looking at the files after tar -xvf
... I find that there still is no desktop-integration directory in the
main installation tree of
Girvin
This is a topic I have some interest in and have been following.
While I am aware of the capacity to run the soffice script from the
terminal and even creating a custom launcher for the Gnome, XFCE4 and in
Mint, Mate panels, what I am curious about is exactly why doing so is
even
Heinrich,
I am sorry. I misunderstood your intent. Yes, it does seem like a bug
and should be addressed.
I cannot shed any light on this specific subject, since I am not using
any 4.x LO version. I am keeping with the stable 3.6+ series until
4.1.4+ is released. Then I may try it,
:)
From: sun shine phaedr...@gmail.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 22 July 2013, 15:09
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] desktop-integration
Girvin
This is a topic I have some interest in and have been following.
While I am aware of the capacity to run the soffice script from
Hi Girvin,
Sorry for jumping in but I read this text from you:
Girvin R. Herr wrote (22-07-13 20:50)
[...]
I cannot shed any light on this specific subject, since I am not using
any 4.x LO version. I am keeping with the stable 3.6+ series until
4.1.4+ is released.
[...]
The 4.0 series is
Hello,
The system on which I am trying to get LO 4.1-RC3 to run is:
Linux Debian Wheezy with KDE 4.10, latest software levels.
I first removed LO 3.6.2 using apt-get remove libreoffice* and then
installed 4.1-RC3 using dpkg- i *deb from within all three directories in
the correct sequence.
The
On 21/07/13 09:34, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hello,
The system on which I am trying to get LO 4.1-RC3 to run is:
Linux Debian Wheezy with KDE 4.10, latest software levels.
I first removed LO 3.6.2 using apt-get remove libreoffice* and then
installed 4.1-RC3 using dpkg- i *deb from within all
Hello,
Do you know whether the native MySQL connector works under LO 4.0.4?
If it does I will try THAT release, otherwise I will revert to 3.6.2 -
which works just fine.
Regards
H
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 11:06:35 +0200, sun shine phaedr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/07/13 09:34, Heinrich Stoellinger
On 21/07/13 10:14, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hello,
Do you know whether the native MySQL connector works under LO 4.0.4?
If it does I will try THAT release, otherwise I will revert to 3.6.2 -
which works just fine.
Regards
H
Hi Heinrich
No I don't know specifically - if you tell me how
On 21/07/13 12:18, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hi,
Well, I suppose you have a MySQL database running? If so, you have to
define
an LO-Base-database (file-new database). Then you have to choose the
Native MySQL connection, server parameters (such as server name, MySQL-
database name, password,
Heinrich,
Have you tried bringing LibreOffice up with soffice in a terminal
shell, or unambiguously, /opt/libreoffice4.1/program/soffice (less
quotes, of course)?
If that works, then you could manually add a link in your menu or at
least an icon on your desktop.
soffice is the main libreoffice
Hello,
I downloaded LO 4.1.0-RC3 yesterday. Looking at the files after tar -xvf ...
I find that there still is no desktop-integration directory in the main
installation tree of files. Is it meant to be like that?
Regards
H. stoellinger
--
Erstellt mit Operas revolutionärem E-Mail-Modul:
On 20/07/2013 at 17:26, Heinrich Stoellinger hc.stoellin...@aon.at wrote:
I downloaded LO 4.1.0-RC3 yesterday. Looking at the files after tar -xvf
... I find that there still is no desktop-integration directory in the
main installation tree of files. Is it meant to be like that?
You are
On 20/07/2013 at 19:51, Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com
wrote:
So we no longer have to do a separate install command for installing the
desktop menus? So one sudo dpkg -i *.deb is all we need?
Yes, this is how it is supposed to work.
(There are some bugs in rc3 that
On 07/20/2013 02:06 PM, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
On 20/07/2013 at 19:51, Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com
wrote:
So we no longer have to do a separate install command for installing the
desktop menus? So one sudo dpkg -i *.deb is all we need?
Yes, this is how it is supposed
On 20/07/13 19:06, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
On 20/07/2013 at 19:51, Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com
wrote:
So we no longer have to do a separate install command for installing the
desktop menus? So one sudo dpkg -i *.deb is all we need?
Yes, this is how it is supposed to
33 matches
Mail list logo
