[libreoffice-users] Calc fails to warn when insert cell breaks sum(A1:A2)

2015-02-12 Thread Spencer Graves
I recently noticed that a complicated spreadsheet that had previously 
functioned correctly was giving wrong answers without warning.  After the usual 
wailing and gnashing of teeth, I traced the problem to a cell containing 
=C4-SUM(G11:G1016)”.  Further experimentation produced the following simple 
version of the problem:  


(1) Let A1=1, A2=2, and A3=sum(A1:A2);  A3 computes here as 3.
(2) Insert cell A1 shift right.
(3) Observe: A3 now computes as 2. This is obvious in this case but far from 
obvious in a complicated spreadsheet, where the connection between A1 and A3 is 
obscure. In such cases, For an insert that would cause an error in a reference 
like A1:A2, I believe that Calc should issue a warning something like, 
“WARNING: Insert may change the answer computed in A3. Do you want to proceed?” 
I further think there should be no default and the user should be forced to 
select either “Yes” or “No”.  


This was observed in LO 4.3.5.2, LO 4..5.0.0.alpha0 2015-02-05 00:36:56, and MS 
Excell 2003 sp3.


Should this be filed as a bug report or a feature request?  If yes, which, and 
what message should display?  


Wikipedia says, A software bug is an error, flaw, failure, or fault in a 
computer program or system that causes it to produce an incorrect or unexpected 
result, or to behave in unintended ways.”  I think this fits that definition.  
However, it may qualify as a feature request, because the fix is less than 
obvious (and it has been around for so long).  


Enjoy, Spencer 


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated lists?

2015-02-12 Thread Sophie
Hi Gary,
Le 12/02/2015 11:33, Gary Collins a écrit :
 Hi, 
 Hopefully an easy question for someone :-)
 How to I turn off auto-generation of list entries (preferably without 
 altering any other settings? 
 
 I generally tend to find this feature a pain in the proverbials, and would 
 much rather apply list formatting, etc using styles, after a document (or 
 section of a document) has been completed.
 
 The problem really came to a head yesterday, when I was writing up some notes 
 on language, and made some table headings (not an actual table, but one made 
 manually using tabs) using M. F. N. (for masculine, feminine, neuter).
 
 LO completely reinterpreted this, and, when I pressed 'enter,' made it into 
 the first entry of a list, supposing it to be the Roman numeral M, and 
 inserting MI at the beginning of the new line. 
 I was unable to find a way to eradicate this effectively, and had to stop 
 what I was doing as a result.
 I looked in options and I looked in preferences but couldn't see a way to 
 turn off this behaviour. There was nothing in the paragraph style that I 
 could see that should cause this behaviour.
 
 (IMO, this behaviour should be restricted to styles which are designated for 
 lists).

This FAQ may help you
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Faq/Writer/025

Kind regards
Sophie

-- 
Sophie Gautier sophie.gaut...@documentfoundation.org
GSM: +33683901545
IRC: sophi
Co-founder - Release coordinator
The Document Foundation

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated lists?

2015-02-12 Thread Gary Collins
Hi, 
Hopefully an easy question for someone :-)
How to I turn off auto-generation of list entries (preferably without altering 
any other settings? 

I generally tend to find this feature a pain in the proverbials, and would much 
rather apply list formatting, etc using styles, after a document (or section of 
a document) has been completed.

The problem really came to a head yesterday, when I was writing up some notes 
on language, and made some table headings (not an actual table, but one made 
manually using tabs) using M. F. N. (for masculine, feminine, neuter).

LO completely reinterpreted this, and, when I pressed 'enter,' made it into the 
first entry of a list, supposing it to be the Roman numeral M, and inserting MI 
at the beginning of the new line. 
I was unable to find a way to eradicate this effectively, and had to stop what 
I was doing as a result.
I looked in options and I looked in preferences but couldn't see a way to 
turn off this behaviour. There was nothing in the paragraph style that I could 
see that should cause this behaviour.

(IMO, this behaviour should be restricted to styles which are designated for 
lists).

thanks, /Gary
  
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] LO (writer, esp.) and alternative keyboard layouts

2015-02-12 Thread Gary Collins
Thanks for your relpy, Simos.
I had assumed that I was (or should be) getting single Unicode characters, and 
I think you have confirmed that in your reply. 


I was wondering if the language input setting should be regarded as local or 
global; I had assumed global, but a few tests have shown that actually the 
setting is local for each document, so no problem there

I still have a problem with the dead key combinations, which appear to stop 
working at random times, for no apparent reason. This may be a problem with LO, 
or it may be a problem with windows (7); since the problem appears to manifest 
at random times, it's difficult, if not impossible, to know the source or cause.

The problem may be exemplified as follows (I hope these characters still 
display correctly after I press send!!):


Normally, using polytonic Greek keyboard, 
A key gives bare alpha, α
dead key / , followed by A key, gives alpha +smooth breathing + acute, ἄ
dead key Shift+/, followed by A key, gives alpha + rough breathing + acute, ἅ
Adding AltGr to the dead key combination adds an iota subscript, so:
altGr + / followed by A gives ᾄ
altGr + shift + / followed by A gives ᾅ

Then something mysterious, as yet undetected, happens, and most of these stop 
working:
A key still gives alpha, α
dead key / , followed by A still gives ἄ
but all the other combinations now give bare alpha, α.

It's as if the dead keys on their own still work, but combinations with 
shift, or with altGr, or both, stop working.

As I say, I don't know where the problem arises, but it's making life rather 
frustrating at the moment. I can usually, eventually, get the problem to go 
away, at least for a while, but again, there seems to be no consistent way to 
do this; what works some times doesn't work at other times. I'd like to be able 
to get to the bottom of this somehow.

Best,/Gary



   From: Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com
 To: Gary Collins gcatl...@yahoo.co.uk 
Cc: Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com; users@global.libreoffice.org 
users@global.libreoffice.org 
 Sent: Monday, 9 February 2015, 8:24
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] LO (writer, esp.) and alternative keyboard 
layouts
   

 On 6 February 2015 at 10:11, Gary Collins gcatl...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 Hi,
 I've been having some trouble lately using in Writer especially when using 
 alternative keyboard mappings (Windows 7). Yesterday, for example, I was 
 using a mapping that was basically English but which included macron vowels 
 (that's vowels with a bar over the top, used, e.g., to indicate a long vowel 
 in works of reference for Latin). I found that the assigned key combination - 
 in this case, AltGr+vowel - was giving me a vowel with something like an 
 acute accent over it instead of a bar - though the key combination was 
 working OK in other applications, e.g. WordPad and even the humble NotePad.It 
 did start to work, however; but in order to get it to do so, I had to set the 
 keyboard in the language bar whilst the LO document was active. Is this the 
 expected behaviour? Should LO override the locale settings in cases like 
 this? (wondering).


When you type characters with diacritics, you can get either a
precomposed character or a character with diacritics. It depends
on the keyboard layout that is active at the moment.
For Windows and the default Latin/Greek keyboard layouts, you get
precomposed characters. These are single Unicode characters that show
the letter with any accents/diacritics drawn on it. They look really
well, because the font designer had to draw them with the diacritics
on top.
The Unicode standard stopped accepting those precomposed characters
into the standard about 15 years ago because you had to have all
combinations of letters with accents into the standard.
The keyboard layouts for Latin and Greek produce precomposed
characters. For some exotic Latin scripts, there are no precomposed
characters, so they use diacritics.

ALPHA with TONOS: ά (precomposed, it's a single character)
ALPHA with TONOS: ά (with diacritic, it's actually two characters!)

I have an impression you are hitting some issue with the above two
different ways to represent characters with accents/diacritics.

 Again, whilst using the polytonic Greek keyboard, I have noticed that from 
 time to time the key combinations required to obtain some of the special 
 characters stop working - that is, the key presses appear to be detected, 
 but they stop having the desired effect. An example: to obtain an alpha with 
 a rough breathing, acute accent and iota subscript, I would have to first 
 press the combination altGr + shift + '/', release those keys, and then 
 press 'a' (for alpha). It's the altGr + shift combination that stops 
 working here; when I press 'a' I get an alpha alright, but without the 
 special diacritics (I think that's the right word).Using a combination 
 without shift and/or altGr still works; e.g. I can press (and release) 
 '/' and then press 'a' and get an 

Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated lists?

2015-02-12 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
I don't seem to be able to get the (wrong) results as described.  I'm
attaching a quick little simple example file to give a few examples of
what it sounds like you are doing - and a table method.  Obviously i
have missed something from the description so hopefully you'll be able
to clarify what you are doing.

On the other hand maybe my file might be free of formatting issues and
prove useful in getting the task done.  If that's the case i might
upload it to Nabble so that other people can use it but i haven't done
anything particularly special so i doubt it's going to help in this
way.


When any word-processor behaves badly i find it helps to start a fresh
new document and use the default format for original versions of the
file.  Then i might maybe create copies in other formats for other
people to use but at the moment i am beginning to find an increasing
number of people seem increasingly happy with ODF.

A lot of people seem to open an old document and then use that to
create new documents but that way tons of hidden formatting codes and
stuff seem to lurk and sometimes do some really odd things.  I once
found a document that seemed to have traces indicating it had started
as a Word Perfect document and at some point been through Apple
systems and Word.  CopyPasting as unformatted text into a fresh new
document got rid of all sorts of weird problems.

Writer doesn't seem to generate lists in the way described, at least
not for me.  Calc does, of course, but i usually have to select 3-4
cells and then drag.  So i am not sure what is going on.
Regards from
Tom :)






On 12 February 2015 at 10:49, Gary Collins gcatl...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 Hi Sophie,
 Thanks for the link; yes, I looked at that menu as well, but couldn't see 
 anything pertinent to generation of list entries. Perhaps I have a blind spot?
 /Gary
From: Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com
  To: users@global.libreoffice.org
  Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2015, 10:41
  Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated 
 lists?

 Hi Gary,


 Le 12/02/2015 11:33, Gary Collins a écrit :
 Hi,
 Hopefully an easy question for someone :-)
 How to I turn off auto-generation of list entries (preferably without 
 altering any other settings?

 I generally tend to find this feature a pain in the proverbials, and would 
 much rather apply list formatting, etc using styles, after a document (or 
 section of a document) has been completed.

 The problem really came to a head yesterday, when I was writing up some 
 notes on language, and made some table headings (not an actual table, but 
 one made manually using tabs) using M. F. N. (for masculine, feminine, 
 neuter).

 LO completely reinterpreted this, and, when I pressed 'enter,' made it into 
 the first entry of a list, supposing it to be the Roman numeral M, and 
 inserting MI at the beginning of the new line.
 I was unable to find a way to eradicate this effectively, and had to stop 
 what I was doing as a result.
 I looked in options and I looked in preferences but couldn't see a way 
 to turn off this behaviour. There was nothing in the paragraph style that I 
 could see that should cause this behaviour.

 (IMO, this behaviour should be restricted to styles which are designated for 
 lists).

 This FAQ may help you
 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Faq/Writer/025

 Kind regards
 Sophie

 --
 Sophie Gautier sophie.gaut...@documentfoundation.org
 GSM: +33683901545
 IRC: sophi
 Co-founder - Release coordinator
 The Document Foundation

 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Conditional Whitespace for Mail Merge

2015-02-12 Thread Sven Schüring
Hi Andreas,

thanks for your reply.

I've a Calc-Sheet with address data (linked with Writer it was transformed
to a database).
In my used Writer (LO 4.4) the query does no work properly.
The query described by you would be in my case [my calc
sheet].members.title !=  but only [title] !=  is interpreted correctly.
:-/ (why?)
But in my case the whitespace is printed anytime.

Condition: [title] != 
Then:  
Else: empty field

I think there could be a bug?
Can you confirm my described behavior?

regards,
Sven

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de wrote:

 Composing the lines of an addressing area is easy to do with a query.
 Details
 depend on the type of your database.

 In Writer you can use a conditional field with a nested data source field
 like this:
 If condition: DataSource.QueryName.Title != 
 Then:  



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Conditional-Whitespace-for-Mail-Merge-tp4139674p4139762.html
 Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated lists?

2015-02-12 Thread Gary Collins
Hi Sophie,
Thanks for the link; yes, I looked at that menu as well, but couldn't see 
anything pertinent to generation of list entries. Perhaps I have a blind spot?
/Gary
   From: Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com
 To: users@global.libreoffice.org 
 Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2015, 10:41
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated lists?
   
Hi Gary,


Le 12/02/2015 11:33, Gary Collins a écrit :
 Hi, 
 Hopefully an easy question for someone :-)
 How to I turn off auto-generation of list entries (preferably without 
 altering any other settings? 
 
 I generally tend to find this feature a pain in the proverbials, and would 
 much rather apply list formatting, etc using styles, after a document (or 
 section of a document) has been completed.
 
 The problem really came to a head yesterday, when I was writing up some notes 
 on language, and made some table headings (not an actual table, but one made 
 manually using tabs) using M. F. N. (for masculine, feminine, neuter).
 
 LO completely reinterpreted this, and, when I pressed 'enter,' made it into 
 the first entry of a list, supposing it to be the Roman numeral M, and 
 inserting MI at the beginning of the new line. 
 I was unable to find a way to eradicate this effectively, and had to stop 
 what I was doing as a result.
 I looked in options and I looked in preferences but couldn't see a way to 
 turn off this behaviour. There was nothing in the paragraph style that I 
 could see that should cause this behaviour.
 
 (IMO, this behaviour should be restricted to styles which are designated for 
 lists).

This FAQ may help you
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Faq/Writer/025

Kind regards
Sophie

-- 
Sophie Gautier sophie.gaut...@documentfoundation.org
GSM: +33683901545
IRC: sophi
Co-founder - Release coordinator
The Document Foundation

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


  
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibréOffice and PDFs (Again)

2015-02-12 Thread Jim Seymour
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:43:20 -0700 (MST)
V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu wrote:

 Jim Seymour wrote
[snip]
  
  Question: Do recent (i.e. 4.3.x.x and later) versions of LO
  *capably* allow the opening/editing/saving of PDF files that are
  writable and not encrypted or otherwise protected?
 
 Simple answer... YES, but LibreOffice is not a PDF editor and will
 never be. It will always import to ODF native formats,  and then must
 export/print back to PDF as a round trip process. 
[snip]

Surely a distinction without a difference?


On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:19:03 +
Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:

 It might be possible to ask
 your distro's package maintainers if they would be kind enough to make
 a more recent version of LibreOffice available in their repos.
[snip]

Even my Linux Mint 17 MATE install at home has only 4.2.7 (near as I
can tell, from here).  I doubt I'll see an LO upgrade for Mint 13.

In any event: Not particularly germane: 99-44/100% of the end-users at
work are using MS-Win7 Pro, and it for them I ask this question.  If LO
can do the job: Great.  If not: I guess we'll have to go out and but a
few copies of some-or-another PDF-editing-capable thing.


On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:47:34 +
jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:

 
 On 10/02/15 16:43, V Stuart Foote wrote:
 
  Your unsupported version of LibreOffice 3.5.7 was release 5 Oct
  2012 and is well past its end-of-life from the projects
  perspective. 
 
 - From the perspective of a commercial enterprise, the EOL dates
 guarantee that LibO is not suitable.

This is a concept that the open source community does not seem to
grasp.  This is but one reason, out of many, that Linux will *never*,
*ever* replace MS-Win on the desktop.  It is one of the reasons I no
longer suggest the idea.

 
 With thirteen months from feature freeze, to EOL, an organization
 doesn't have time to test, much less deploy new versions, before they
 are passed the EOL date. Which makes purchasing Tier 3 support
 mandatory.
[snip]

And, if we had to purchase the stuff, anyway, why not just go with the
flow and continue purchasing MS Office?

Not trying to be an urmas.  Just trying to point out the realities of a
business environment.  I have all the time in the world (that I care to
invest, anyway) at home.  At work...?  No, not so much.

Even at home: I install LTS versions of stuff where I can, and let it
run until it EOLs.


None of the above is by way of complaint.  It is what it is, and I'm
more than happy with it as it is.  It's worth way, *way* more than what
I paid for it, so who'm I to complain? :)

Thanks for the responses, everybody.  I'll see if I can install 4.3.x.x
or later on my laptop, under its Win7 Pro boot, and see if it'll do what
we need.

Regards,
Jim
-- 
Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
filtering.  If you reply to this email and your email is
rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my
web form at http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Calc fails to warn when insert cell breaks sum(A1:A2)

2015-02-12 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
I think post as a Feature Request.  If at all possible i think it's
best to post Feature Requests instead of bug-reports.  They have a
much bigger feel-good factor and i suspect they are more likely to
attract new devs.

I think there has got to be a default and i tend to prefer it if there
is one.  It can be a pain when you know the pop-up and have to do more
than just hit enter all the time.
Regards form
Tom :)




On 12 February 2015 at 20:14, Spencer Graves
spencer.gra...@prodsyse.com wrote:
 I recently noticed that a complicated spreadsheet that had previously 
 functioned correctly was giving wrong answers without warning.  After the 
 usual wailing and gnashing of teeth, I traced the problem to a cell 
 containing =C4-SUM(G11:G1016)”.  Further experimentation produced the 
 following simple version of the problem:


 (1) Let A1=1, A2=2, and A3=sum(A1:A2);  A3 computes here as 3.
 (2) Insert cell A1 shift right.
 (3) Observe: A3 now computes as 2. This is obvious in this case but far from 
 obvious in a complicated spreadsheet, where the connection between A1 and A3 
 is obscure. In such cases, For an insert that would cause an error in a 
 reference like A1:A2, I believe that Calc should issue a warning something 
 like, “WARNING: Insert may change the answer computed in A3. Do you want to 
 proceed?” I further think there should be no default and the user should be 
 forced to select either “Yes” or “No”.


 This was observed in LO 4.3.5.2, LO 4..5.0.0.alpha0 2015-02-05 00:36:56, and 
 MS Excell 2003 sp3.


 Should this be filed as a bug report or a feature request?  If yes, which, 
 and what message should display?


 Wikipedia says, A software bug is an error, flaw, failure, or fault in a 
 computer program or system that causes it to produce an incorrect or 
 unexpected result, or to behave in unintended ways.”  I think this fits that 
 definition.  However, it may qualify as a feature request, because the fix is 
 less than obvious (and it has been around for so long).


 Enjoy, Spencer


 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] Romove all pictures

2015-02-12 Thread Emil Payne
There are times when I copy  paste from websites to Calc. Things like 
lists of TV stations or Twitter followers.


When I do so it also captures all the images and pastes them to the 
document.


This causes a big mess since most of the images cover each other and do 
not align with their respective text entry.


I have to click them one by one and delete them. With a big list this 
takes a lot of time.


Is there a way of removing all images at once?

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Calc fails to warn when insert cell breaks sum(A1:A2)

2015-02-12 Thread libreoffice-ml . mbourne

Brian Barker wrote:

At 12:14 12/02/2015 -0800, Spencer Graves wrote:

I recently noticed that a complicated spreadsheet that had previously
functioned correctly was giving wrong answers without warning. After
the usual wailing and gnashing of teeth, I traced the problem to a
cell containing =C4-SUM(G11:G1016). Further experimentation produced
the following simple version of the problem:

(1) Let A1=1, A2=2, and A3=sum(A1:A2); A3 computes here as 3.
(2) Insert cell A1 shift right.
(3) Observe: A3 now computes as 2. This is obvious in this case but
far from obvious in a complicated spreadsheet, where the connection
between A1 and A3 is obscure. In such cases, For an insert that would
cause an error in a reference like A1:A2, I believe that Calc should
issue a warning something like, WARNING: Insert may change the answer
computed in A3. Do you want to proceed? I further think there should
be no default and the user should be forced to select either Yes or
No.


Sorry, but I do not see how you can claim that the formula in A3 is
broken: it remains as =SUM(A1:A2) exactly as you entered it. What has
changed is that you have displaced your data and made the result of the
formula correctly different. I'm glad that Calc has allowed you to do
this. If a spreadsheet program warned you when any calculated results
might change, you would have to confirm just about every entry or change.


This was observed in LO 4.3.5.2, LO 4..5.0.0.alpha0 2015-02-05
00:36:56, and MS Excel 2003 sp3.


And perhaps in every other spreadsheet ever created?


Should this be filed as a bug report or a feature request?


Neither, I hope.


Wikipedia says, A software bug is an error, flaw, failure, or fault
in a computer program or system that causes it to produce an incorrect
or unexpected result, or to behave in unintended ways. I think this
fits that definition.


I don't see that the result is incorrect and I'm sure the behaviour is
not unintended. I accept that you see this as an unexpected result, but
then expectation is in the eye of the beholder.

A couple of points:

o Spreadsheets are useful only when the (usually hidden) formulae are
appropriate and there is generally no way to ensure that this is so.
Consequently spreadsheets are a fragile way to construct a means of
computation. This is perhaps unfortunate but nevertheless true.

o One helpful technique might be, after selecting A1 and before creating
the problem by displacing its value, to use Tools | Detective  | Trace
Dependents to show where any dependent formulae are. This might help you
to rethink your change.

I trust this helps.

Brian Barker


Another point to add... If the problem is that spreadsheet has been 
carefully created, but used by less skilled users (who change values 
they shouldn't, overwrite formulas, insert extra cells where they break 
formulas etc.), you can guard against that with cell protection. By 
default, all cells are marked to be protected if the sheet is protected, 
although the sheet is not protected by default. Steps to make use of 
this are:

- Create the spreadsheet as normal
- For each cell or range of cells which the user needs to modify:
  - Select the cell (or range of cells)
  - Format  Cells  Cell Protection  Untick Protected  OK
- For each sheet containing cells to be protected:
  - Tools  Protect Document  Sheet, optionally enter a password  OK

If you later need to make changes to the protected cells, go to Tools  
Protect Document  Sheet. You'll have to enter the password if you set 
one (so don't forget it!) Once you're done, enable the protection again 
(entering the password again if you want to use one).


If you don't set a password, the sheet will still be protected against 
accidental changes, but can be unprotected without entering a password 
so doesn't stop people who are determined to break it. That's probably 
good enough for most purposes. Then again, I doubt the protection is 
very secure anyway (unless the document is somehow encrypted to allow 
reading but not modification of the protected cells), so while it would 
take a bit more skill and determination to get around a password it may 
still be possible.


I'd suggest not using the same password as you do for anything else that 
needs to be secure (not that you'd use the same password for more than 
one thing anyway, of course...). Older versions of MS Office stored its 
equivalent of that password in the file with a relatively simple 
obfuscation, so it was possible to extract the password from the file. 
LibreOffice and newer versions of MS Office are probably better, but I 
still wouldn't like to bet my bank account on it ;o)


Mark.


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be 

Re: [libreoffice-users] Romove all pictures

2015-02-12 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
I was going to suggest that answer too but Brian beat me and gave a
better answer too :))  I felt like i really learned something that i
could possibly remember and probably even find useful myself.  Usually
my usage is tooo basic to make much advantage of most of the answers
here but it's still feels good to see them.
Regards from
Tom :)

On 12 February 2015 at 22:05,  libreoffice-ml.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
 Emil Payne wrote:

 There are times when I copy  paste from websites to Calc. Things like
 lists of TV stations or Twitter followers.

 When I do so it also captures all the images and pastes them to the
 document.

 This causes a big mess since most of the images cover each other and do
 not align with their respective text entry.

 I have to click them one by one and delete them. With a big list this
 takes a lot of time.

 Is there a way of removing all images at once?


 Rather than just pasting, select Edit  Paste Special, and choose
 Unformatted Text.

 I don't think there's an easy way to keep text formatting but not images,
 but I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong.

 Mark.


 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] installation problem LO4.4 - linux mint

2015-02-12 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
Hmm, i am not sure.  Have you made sure you have
administrator/SuperUser rights?  Sudo perhaps?
Regards from
Tom :)

On 12 February 2015 at 17:00, sqroot sqr...@zoho.com wrote:
 hallo!


 I was curious to test LO4.4, so i tried to install it on Linux Mint 17 Qiana. 
 I followed the installation instructions, first purged the old LO-version, 
 downloaded the file, checked it, etc... installation worked fine. but when I 
 try to start it, wheter from the icons or from the command line, i get this 
 error message




 Libre Office 4.4 - Fatal Error
 The application cannot be started.
 User installation could not be completed.



 any ideas, why i get this error message and how to fix it?


 thank you, Markus


 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Romove all pictures

2015-02-12 Thread libreoffice-ml . mbourne

Emil Payne wrote:

There are times when I copy  paste from websites to Calc. Things like
lists of TV stations or Twitter followers.

When I do so it also captures all the images and pastes them to the
document.

This causes a big mess since most of the images cover each other and do
not align with their respective text entry.

I have to click them one by one and delete them. With a big list this
takes a lot of time.

Is there a way of removing all images at once?


Rather than just pasting, select Edit  Paste Special, and choose 
Unformatted Text.


I don't think there's an easy way to keep text formatting but not 
images, but I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong.


Mark.


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Calc fails to warn when insert cell breaks sum(A1:A2)

2015-02-12 Thread Brian Barker

At 12:14 12/02/2015 -0800, Spencer Graves wrote:
I recently noticed that a complicated spreadsheet that had 
previously functioned correctly was giving wrong answers without 
warning. After the usual wailing and gnashing of teeth, I traced the 
problem to a cell containing =C4-SUM(G11:G1016). Further 
experimentation produced the following simple version of the problem:


(1) Let A1=1, A2=2, and A3=sum(A1:A2); A3 computes here as 3.
(2) Insert cell A1 shift right.
(3) Observe: A3 now computes as 2. This is obvious in this case but 
far from obvious in a complicated spreadsheet, where the connection 
between A1 and A3 is obscure. In such cases, For an insert that 
would cause an error in a reference like A1:A2, I believe that Calc 
should issue a warning something like, WARNING: Insert may change 
the answer computed in A3. Do you want to proceed? I further think 
there should be no default and the user should be forced to select 
either Yes or No.


Sorry, but I do not see how you can claim that the formula in A3 is 
broken: it remains as =SUM(A1:A2) exactly as you entered it. What 
has changed is that you have displaced your data and made the result 
of the formula correctly different. I'm glad that Calc has allowed 
you to do this. If a spreadsheet program warned you when any 
calculated results might change, you would have to confirm just about 
every entry or change.


This was observed in LO 4.3.5.2, LO 4..5.0.0.alpha0 2015-02-05 
00:36:56, and MS Excel 2003 sp3.


And perhaps in every other spreadsheet ever created?


Should this be filed as a bug report or a feature request?


Neither, I hope.

Wikipedia says, A software bug is an error, flaw, failure, or fault 
in a computer program or system that causes it to produce an 
incorrect or unexpected result, or to behave in unintended ways. I 
think this fits that definition.


I don't see that the result is incorrect and I'm sure the behaviour 
is not unintended. I accept that you see this as an unexpected 
result, but then expectation is in the eye of the beholder.


A couple of points:

o Spreadsheets are useful only when the (usually hidden) formulae are 
appropriate and there is generally no way to ensure that this is so. 
Consequently spreadsheets are a fragile way to construct a means of 
computation. This is perhaps unfortunate but nevertheless true.


o One helpful technique might be, after selecting A1 and before 
creating the problem by displacing its value, to use Tools | 
Detective  | Trace Dependents to show where any dependent formulae 
are. This might help you to rethink your change.


I trust this helps.

Brian Barker


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Calc fails to warn when insert cell breaks sum(A1:A2)

2015-02-12 Thread Kaj
I think have a wee difficult to understand what you are doing, as I do 
not see any error. You put constants 1 and 2 in the cells A1 and A2 and 
a sum formula in A3. Then you insert an empty cell in A1 while moving 
the existing content in the cells one step to the right. Hence after the 
insertion A2 contains the constant 1, A3 contains the constant 2 and A4 
contains the formula. All references are relative, so cell A4 now is = 
sum(A2:A3) giving the result 3, just as before. That the cell A3 
computes 2 is evident as it contains the constant you put in cell A2 
before the move.


So sorry, I am not clever enough to realize your problem.


Den 2015-02-12 21:14, skrev Spencer Graves:

I recently noticed that a complicated spreadsheet that had previously functioned 
correctly was giving wrong answers without warning.  After the usual wailing and 
gnashing of teeth, I traced the problem to a cell containing 
=C4-SUM(G11:G1016)”.  Further experimentation produced the following simple 
version of the problem:


(1) Let A1=1, A2=2, and A3=sum(A1:A2);  A3 computes here as 3.
(2) Insert cell A1 shift right.
(3) Observe: A3 now computes as 2. This is obvious in this case but far from 
obvious in a complicated spreadsheet, where the connection between A1 and A3 is 
obscure. In such cases, For an insert that would cause an error in a reference 
like A1:A2, I believe that Calc should issue a warning something like, 
“WARNING: Insert may change the answer computed in A3. Do you want to proceed?” 
I further think there should be no default and the user should be forced to 
select either “Yes” or “No”.


This was observed in LO 4.3.5.2, LO 4..5.0.0.alpha0 2015-02-05 00:36:56, and MS 
Excell 2003 sp3.


Should this be filed as a bug report or a feature request?  If yes, which, and 
what message should display?


Wikipedia says, A software bug is an error, flaw, failure, or fault in a 
computer program or system that causes it to produce an incorrect or unexpected 
result, or to behave in unintended ways.”  I think this fits that definition.  
However, it may qualify as a feature request, because the fix is less than obvious 
(and it has been around for so long).


Enjoy, Spencer





--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Calc fails to warn when insert cell breaks sum(A1:A2)

2015-02-12 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
I'm guessing you are a fairly logical and astute thinker rather than a
typical office drone or a typically tech-averse accountancy person.

Yes there is no problem unless the user is a moron.  Sadly many of us
often are a bit moronic from time to time.

The suggestion was to maybe write a feature request to guard against
user-error or pebkac problems.
Regards from
Tom :)


On 13 February 2015 at 00:14, Kaj 70147pers...@telia.com wrote:
 I think have a wee difficult to understand what you are doing, as I do not
 see any error. You put constants 1 and 2 in the cells A1 and A2 and a sum
 formula in A3. Then you insert an empty cell in A1 while moving the existing
 content in the cells one step to the right. Hence after the insertion A2
 contains the constant 1, A3 contains the constant 2 and A4 contains the
 formula. All references are relative, so cell A4 now is = sum(A2:A3) giving
 the result 3, just as before. That the cell A3 computes 2 is evident as it
 contains the constant you put in cell A2 before the move.

 So sorry, I am not clever enough to realize your problem.


 Den 2015-02-12 21:14, skrev Spencer Graves:

 I recently noticed that a complicated spreadsheet that had previously
 functioned correctly was giving wrong answers without warning.  After the
 usual wailing and gnashing of teeth, I traced the problem to a cell
 containing =C4-SUM(G11:G1016)”.  Further experimentation produced the
 following simple version of the problem:


 (1) Let A1=1, A2=2, and A3=sum(A1:A2);  A3 computes here as 3.
 (2) Insert cell A1 shift right.
 (3) Observe: A3 now computes as 2. This is obvious in this case but far
 from obvious in a complicated spreadsheet, where the connection between A1
 and A3 is obscure. In such cases, For an insert that would cause an error in
 a reference like A1:A2, I believe that Calc should issue a warning something
 like, “WARNING: Insert may change the answer computed in A3. Do you want to
 proceed?” I further think there should be no default and the user should be
 forced to select either “Yes” or “No”.


 This was observed in LO 4.3.5.2, LO 4..5.0.0.alpha0 2015-02-05 00:36:56,
 and MS Excell 2003 sp3.


 Should this be filed as a bug report or a feature request?  If yes, which,
 and what message should display?


 Wikipedia says, A software bug is an error, flaw, failure, or fault in a
 computer program or system that causes it to produce an incorrect or
 unexpected result, or to behave in unintended ways.”  I think this fits that
 definition.  However, it may qualify as a feature request, because the fix
 is less than obvious (and it has been around for so long).


 Enjoy, Spencer




 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users]

2015-02-12 Thread Kim Maass
PLEASE TAKE ME OFF OF ALL OF YOUR LISTS!  THANK YOU.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Remove all pictures

2015-02-12 Thread Brian Barker

At 15:14 12/02/2015 -0600, Emil Payne wrote:
There are times when I copy  paste from websites to Calc. Things 
like lists of TV stations or Twitter followers. When I do so it also 
captures all the images and pastes them to the document. This causes 
a big mess since most of the images cover each other and do not 
align with their respective text entry. I have to click them one by 
one and delete them. With a big list this takes a lot of time. Is 
there a way of removing all images at once?


o Go to Edit | Select All (or press Ctrl+A).
o Go to Edit | Delete Content... (or press Delete).
o In the Delete Contents dialogue, untick Delete all if necessary 
and ensure only Objects is ticked.

o OK.

You may also like to experiment with using Edit | Paste Special... 
(or Ctrl+Shift+V) instead of ordinary Paste to insert the material 
originally. In the Paste Special dialogue, select Unformatted text.


I trust this helps.

Brian Barker


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Where is Base?

2015-02-12 Thread pranzar
Hello. I just installed 4.4.03 on Windows 7. 

I'd like to use Base.

When I click on the LibreOffice icon on my desktop, I see a screen with list
of buttons on the left under Create. I select Base Database but nothing
happens.

The only buttons that work are Writer and Calc.

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Where-is-Base-tp4139808.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibréOffice and PDFs (Again)

2015-02-12 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
PDF Editor or PDF Editing can mean many different things.  It
rarely means editing in the way you would edit a .doc or .odt.

In a word-processor format when you delete words or add words to a
sentence the whole line reflows to avoid leaving a gap or having words
over-writing each other.  Add or remove enough words and the rest of
the paragraph adjusts and may well affect the length of the whole
document.  If you have images Anchored to paragraph, character or
as character then those images will also move.  If images (or other
objects) have almost any of the wrap settings then text will usually
reflow around the image rather than over-writing it or vanishing under
it.

With almost all PDF Editors each element on the page might be able to
move around but does so without affecting other elements.  An element
might be a line of text, but it's very unlikely to be a whole
sentence.  Another element might be an image but if you move it around
no text reflows around it.  Sometimes words seem to be sort of
sub-elements and/or individual letters can be sub-sub-elements and
removing them sometimes doesn't even affect the other words in the
same line, let alone the flow of the sentence.

So if you are going to buy a Pdf Editor you need to make sure of what
they mean by edit.

Some Pdf Readers offer to convert or export Pdfs to certain formats
but so far i have only seen docX being offered and then it's a bit
hit-or-miss as to whether it's a transistional format that works on
whichever version of MS Office you happen to have - or maybe it uses
MS Office on the machine you export/convert the Pdf from and then you
just have to hope you have the same version on whichever machine you
are going to edit on - or hope the document  works on non-MS programs.
If the Pdf Readers converted/exported to Doc or Odf, rather than one
of the many versions of DocX, then most of those worries would vanish.


So, LibreOffice CAN edit Pdfs but only in the way most Pdf Editors
mean.  NOT in the way most users expect such editors to work.

Regards from
Tom :)




On 12 February 2015 at 12:14, Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
 On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:43:20 -0700 (MST)
 V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu wrote:

 Jim Seymour wrote
 [snip]
 
  Question: Do recent (i.e. 4.3.x.x and later) versions of LO
  *capably* allow the opening/editing/saving of PDF files that are
  writable and not encrypted or otherwise protected?

 Simple answer... YES, but LibreOffice is not a PDF editor and will
 never be. It will always import to ODF native formats,  and then must
 export/print back to PDF as a round trip process.
 [snip]

 Surely a distinction without a difference?


 On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:19:03 +
 Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:

 It might be possible to ask
 your distro's package maintainers if they would be kind enough to make
 a more recent version of LibreOffice available in their repos.
 [snip]

 Even my Linux Mint 17 MATE install at home has only 4.2.7 (near as I
 can tell, from here).  I doubt I'll see an LO upgrade for Mint 13.

 In any event: Not particularly germane: 99-44/100% of the end-users at
 work are using MS-Win7 Pro, and it for them I ask this question.  If LO
 can do the job: Great.  If not: I guess we'll have to go out and but a
 few copies of some-or-another PDF-editing-capable thing.


 On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:47:34 +
 jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:


 On 10/02/15 16:43, V Stuart Foote wrote:

  Your unsupported version of LibreOffice 3.5.7 was release 5 Oct
  2012 and is well past its end-of-life from the projects
  perspective.

 - From the perspective of a commercial enterprise, the EOL dates
 guarantee that LibO is not suitable.

 This is a concept that the open source community does not seem to
 grasp.  This is but one reason, out of many, that Linux will *never*,
 *ever* replace MS-Win on the desktop.  It is one of the reasons I no
 longer suggest the idea.


 With thirteen months from feature freeze, to EOL, an organization
 doesn't have time to test, much less deploy new versions, before they
 are passed the EOL date. Which makes purchasing Tier 3 support
 mandatory.
 [snip]

 And, if we had to purchase the stuff, anyway, why not just go with the
 flow and continue purchasing MS Office?

 Not trying to be an urmas.  Just trying to point out the realities of a
 business environment.  I have all the time in the world (that I care to
 invest, anyway) at home.  At work...?  No, not so much.

 Even at home: I install LTS versions of stuff where I can, and let it
 run until it EOLs.


 None of the above is by way of complaint.  It is what it is, and I'm
 more than happy with it as it is.  It's worth way, *way* more than what
 I paid for it, so who'm I to complain? :)

 Thanks for the responses, everybody.  I'll see if I can install 4.3.x.x
 or later on my laptop, under its Win7 Pro boot, and see if it'll do what
 we need.

 Regards,
 Jim
 --
 Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive 

Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated lists?

2015-02-12 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
There are various different layers of hidden codes.  Ctrl A, Delete
only gets rid of a few of them.

Some can be seen by pressing the backwards sort of double-struck P in
the toolbar icons.  This shows non-printing characters, such as tabs
and end-of-paragraphs, that don't get printed out.  These are the ones
that get deleted by Ctrl A, delete.

If you poke around with a hex-editor or get even further (well,
slightly further) down into the 1s and 0s (with a side-bar or
something to see the ascii characters) then you see all sorts of weird
characters, most of which are incomprehensible to almost anyone but
some are human-readable and show things such as names, systems,
occasionally even addresses and phone numbers from ancient times.  I
think some of the incomprehensible ones are the ones doing screwey
things.


Yeh, Windows tries to avoid letting people develop good habits and
tries to push them into bad ones.

One of my favs was Microsoft saying you should never accept cookies
and never turn your anti-virus off for anything.  Then their own
website asked you to accept cookies and to install anything from them
they would tell you to turn off your anti-virus.  However if you did
so and ran into troubles then 'experts' would blame the user for
obviously bad habits and ignoring security issues.

One wonders why people are so surprised that Windows so frequently
runs into problems and is so open to malware and attacks.
Regards from
Tom :)



On 12 February 2015 at 12:54, Gary Collins gcatl...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 Hi Tom,


 

 A lot of people seem to open an old document and then use that to
 create new documents

 [sometimes that's the easiest way in windows]

  but that way tons of hidden formatting codes and
 stuff seem to lurk and sometimes do some really odd things.

 [I'd have thought that selecting all with Ctrl-A and hitting del or
 backspace should remove everything? perhaps not?]


  CopyPasting as unformatted text into a fresh new
 document got rid of all sorts of weird problems.

 [I'll try that, it may well work]

 Writer doesn't seem to generate lists in the way described, at least
 not for me.  Calc does, of course, but i usually have to select 3-4
 cells and then drag.  So i am not sure what is going on.


 [I've tried it here in the office with a new document, and it doesn't seem
 to do it here, either; so your explanation may well be right. I'm not sure
 if the version here and the version at home are the same, I'll check.
 The style in my home doc was default, and there was nothing I could find
 that indicated that it might be in the middle of a list. Perhaps there is a
 way of making formatting codes visible in a document? And deleting unwanted
 ones? If not, perhaps it might be a good idea if one were to be introduced?
 ]

 best,
 /Gary





-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated lists?

2015-02-12 Thread Brian Barker

At 10:33 12/02/2015 +, Gary Collins wrote:

Hopefully an easy question for someone :-)


Yup: so easy that there are two answers!

How to I turn off auto-generation of list 
entries (preferably without altering any other 
settings? I generally tend to find this feature 
a pain in the proverbials, and would much rather 
apply list formatting, etc using styles, after a 
document (or section of a document) has been 
completed. The problem really came to a head 
yesterday, when I was writing up some notes on 
language, and made some table headings (not an 
actual table, but one made manually using 
tabs) using M. F. N. (for masculine, feminine, 
neuter). LO completely reinterpreted this, and, 
when I pressed 'enter,'Â made it into the first 
entry of a list, supposing it to be the Roman 
numeral M, and inserting MI at the beginning of 
the new line. I was unable to find a way to 
eradicate this effectively, and had to stop what I was doing as a result.


Always think of keeping the facility and dealing 
it with it piecemeal when it happens. The action 
of pressing Enter to complete the first paragraph 
causes an automatic correction which you will 
notice. The correction is a separate process from 
the paragraph break that you actually want. So if 
you go *immediately* to Edit | Undo (or Ctrl+Z), 
you can remove the correction but retain the part you need.


I looked in options and I looked in 
preferences but couldn't see a way to turn off 
this behaviour. There was nothing in the 
paragraph style that I could see that should cause this behaviour.


If you really want to disable this correction 
process completely, remove the tick from Tools | 
AutoCorrect Options... | Options | Apply numbering - symbol: *.


I trust this helps.

Brian Barker


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Fw: 14 February 2015 - I love Free Software Day

2015-02-12 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
I think this is a nice idea.  Most people on these mailing list
already do quite a lot of work and are under-appreciated.  It would be
nice to see this idea formally extended to cover all the non-devs who
do fantastic work in 'User' / Client Support, Documentation,
Translation.

I think that is the intention but (as just about always) we once again
get ignored and undervalued when it comes to direct comments and
mentions.  So i think just see all the thanks as being at least partly
directed at each of you too!  You all do a fantastic job, even the
lurkers on these lists are often doing a lot outside of the mailing
lists.

On the plus side i guess we do get thanks from individuals probably
more often than devs do and we are not always dealing with grumbles so
maybe this sort of thing is meant to help redress that imbalance ;)

Many thanks to everyone for helping make LibreOffice what it is today.
Fantastic job! :
Many thanks and regards from
Tom :)



On 12 February 2015 at 01:40, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
 Hi,

 FYI - sounds ideal for spreading on social networks shortly before. :)

 - Forwarded message from Matthias Kirschner m...@fsfe.org -

 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:24:03 +0100
 From: Matthias Kirschner m...@fsfe.org
 Subject: 14 February 2015 - I love Free Software Day

 Dear all,

 I am quite sure many of you receive a lot of bug reports, feature
 requests or criticism during the whole year. Sometimes people forget to
 thank others for their good work. So for this Saturday, 14 February
 2015, we again ask people around the globe to show their love to the
 people behind Free Software (=you, too).

 We made some suggestions here (available in 8 languages):

   https://fsfe.org/news/2015/news-20150209-01.html

 and we would be thankful if you can spread this to your communities, and
 thereby motivate other Free Software contributors to continue their good
 work [1].

 Feel free to order some postcards, leaflets, or posters for your office
 on https://fsfe.org/contribute/spreadtheword.en.html#ilovefs-campaign
 or use our graphics
 https://fsfe.org/campaigns/ilovefs/artwork/artwork.html.

 I hope many of you will receive a nice thank you note, a picture
 https://fsfe.org/campaigns/ilovefs/whylovefs/gallery.en.html, a drink,
 some chocolate, a hug, or other cool signs of appreciation. You earned
 it! And I hope that you also have some time to thank others.

 Thank you all for your work!
 Matthias

   1. On 15 February you can write the next bug report ;)

 --
 Matthias Kirschner - Vice President FSFE
 Schönhauser Allee 6/7, 10119 Berlin, t +49-30-27595290
 Weblog (blogs.fsfe.org/mk) - Contact (fsfe.org/about/kirschner)
 Receive monthly Free Software news (fsfe.org/news/newsletter.html)
 Your donation enables our work (fsfe.org/donate)

 - End forwarded message -

 Cheers,

 -- Thorsten

 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated lists?

2015-02-12 Thread Gary Collins
Hi Tom,
    
A lot of people seem to open an old document and then use that to
create new documents
[sometimes that's the easiest way in windows]
 but that way tons of hidden formatting codes and
stuff seem to lurk and sometimes do some really odd things. 
[I'd have thought that selecting all with Ctrl-A and hitting del or backspace 
should remove everything? perhaps not?]

 CopyPasting as unformatted text into a fresh new
document got rid of all sorts of weird problems.
[I'll try that, it may well work]

Writer doesn't seem to generate lists in the way described, at least
not for me.  Calc does, of course, but i usually have to select 3-4
cells and then drag.  So i am not sure what is going on.

[I've tried it here in the office with a new document, and it doesn't seem to 
do it here, either; so your explanation may well be right. I'm not sure if the 
version here and the version at home are the same, I'll check.The style in my 
home doc was default, and there was nothing I could find that indicated that it 
might be in the middle of a list. Perhaps there is a way of making formatting 
codes visible in a document? And deleting unwanted ones? If not, perhaps it 
might be a good idea if one were to be introduced?]

best,/Gary




  
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated lists?

2015-02-12 Thread Gary Collins

  From: Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com
 To: users@global.libreoffice.org 
 Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2015, 13:12
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated lists?
   
At 10:33 12/02/2015 +, Gary Collins wrote:
Hopefully an easy question for someone :-)

Yup: so easy that there are two answers!

...
Always think of keeping the facility and dealing 
it with it piecemeal when it happens. The action 
of pressing Enter to complete the first paragraph 
causes an automatic correction which you will 
notice. The correction is a separate process from 
the paragraph break that you actually want. So if 
you go *immediately* to Edit | Undo (or Ctrl+Z), 
you can remove the correction but retain the part you need.

Thanks, Brian, I'll try to remember to try that and see if it helps.
I looked in options and I looked in 
preferences but couldn't see a way to turn off 
this behaviour. There was nothing in the 
paragraph style that I could see that should cause this behaviour.

If you really want to disable this correction 
process completely, remove the tick from Tools | 
AutoCorrect Options... | Options | Apply numbering - symbol: *.
I'm pretty sure I unchecked that, and it didn't make any difference. I'd better 
double check, though. As I indicated in a response to another reply, it doesn't 
seem to work like that here in the office, in a new document. It seems that in 
my document at home, LO seems to think that it is in the middle of a list and 
responds accordingly. I really don't know. I'm going to install the latest 
version soon, though, and will see if that helps...

I trust this helps.
I hope it does! We'll have to see ;-)

Brian Barker


Thanks,/Gary

   
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated lists?

2015-02-12 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
Yes, you are doing the correct thing.

So, my answer doesn't explain why you are running into the problems
you are having.  My advice might still have helped but more by
accident than for the reasons i gave.  Errr, of course LibreOffice
also puts tons of stuff in that underlaying coding but i think it does
a lot less than Word.

Fortunately Brian has given a good answer that hopefully might help.
His answer just fleshes out the answers given by other people this
time but you can always rely on his answers as being well worth
trying.
Regards from
Tom :)



On 12 February 2015 at 16:12, Gary Collins gcatl...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 ha ha!
 I guess it doesn't surprise me.
 Thinking about it though, that's not what I normally do. What I do is to
 open a document, then create a new one from the filenew menu entry. This
 seems to me to be the best way to do it - but maybe I'm wrong.

 Anyway, I'm probably going to install the latest version very soon, so I'll
 see how that behaves!!

 Thanks,
 /G.

 
 From: Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com
 To: Gary Collins gcatl...@yahoo.co.uk
 Cc: Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com; users@global.libreoffice.org
 users@global.libreoffice.org
 Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2015, 13:30

 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated
 lists?

 Hi :)
 There are various different layers of hidden codes.  Ctrl A, Delete
 only gets rid of a few of them.

 Some can be seen by pressing the backwards sort of double-struck P in
 the toolbar icons.  This shows non-printing characters, such as tabs
 and end-of-paragraphs, that don't get printed out.  These are the ones
 that get deleted by Ctrl A, delete.

 If you poke around with a hex-editor or get even further (well,
 slightly further) down into the 1s and 0s (with a side-bar or
 something to see the ascii characters) then you see all sorts of weird
 characters, most of which are incomprehensible to almost anyone but
 some are human-readable and show things such as names, systems,
 occasionally even addresses and phone numbers from ancient times.  I
 think some of the incomprehensible ones are the ones doing screwey
 things.


 Yeh, Windows tries to avoid letting people develop good habits and
 tries to push them into bad ones.

 One of my favs was Microsoft saying you should never accept cookies
 and never turn your anti-virus off for anything.  Then their own
 website asked you to accept cookies and to install anything from them
 they would tell you to turn off your anti-virus.  However if you did
 so and ran into troubles then 'experts' would blame the user for
 obviously bad habits and ignoring security issues.

 One wonders why people are so surprised that Windows so frequently
 runs into problems and is so open to malware and attacks.
 Regards from
 Tom :)





 On 12 February 2015 at 12:54, Gary Collins gcatl...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 Hi Tom,


 

 A lot of people seem to open an old document and then use that to
 create new documents

 [sometimes that's the easiest way in windows]

  but that way tons of hidden formatting codes and
 stuff seem to lurk and sometimes do some really odd things.

 [I'd have thought that selecting all with Ctrl-A and hitting del or
 backspace should remove everything? perhaps not?]


  CopyPasting as unformatted text into a fresh new
 document got rid of all sorts of weird problems.

 [I'll try that, it may well work]

 Writer doesn't seem to generate lists in the way described, at least
 not for me.  Calc does, of course, but i usually have to select 3-4
 cells and then drag.  So i am not sure what is going on.


 [I've tried it here in the office with a new document, and it doesn't seem
 to do it here, either; so your explanation may well be right. I'm not sure
 if the version here and the version at home are the same, I'll check.
 The style in my home doc was default, and there was nothing I could find
 that indicated that it might be in the middle of a list. Perhaps there is
 a
 way of making formatting codes visible in a document? And deleting
 unwanted
 ones? If not, perhaps it might be a good idea if one were to be
 introduced?
 ]

 best,
 /Gary







-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] Re: Conditional Whitespace for Mail Merge

2015-02-12 Thread Andreas Säger
So it's a Calc sheet actually. I would simply use Calc to concatenate the
proper field contents and then use that calculated field for the mail merge.
Something like =TRIM($A2 $B2 $C2) with a column title in the firs
row copied down along the list.

A database query would be easier to handle because it automatically applies
to the whole record set:
Something like:
SELECT
LTRIM(CONCAT(Title,CONCAT(' ',CONCAT(ForeName,CONCAT(' ',LastName)
AS Full Name,
other fields
FROM Sheet1

This looks horrible because there is only a very limited set of functions
when you mis-use a spreadsheet for a database connection. But with the right
double-quoted names of sheets and columns it will generate a calculated
Full Name field on the fly.
Availlable SQL-functions with file based data sources
http://www.openoffice.org/dba/specifications/file_based_functions.html  

Doing this in the last element of the chain is difficult. The only resource
I know is
http://openoffice.blogs.com/openoffice/2007/05/suppressing_bla.html
describing a solution for a similar problem.



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Conditional-Whitespace-for-Mail-Merge-tp4139674p4139885.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Conditional Whitespace for Mail Merge

2015-02-12 Thread Sven Schüring
Hi Andreas,

thank you for your effort. :)

I got the fail.
Our concluded condition is working correctly.

Field type - Conditional Text
Condition: [Titel] != 
Then:  
Else: 

Now the big BUT!
If I click me through the mail merge assistant I got a document preview
where I can scroll through the data sets.
The document preview is displaying the whitespace anytime. (this lead me
astray)
If I print/save the mail merge document I can see that die conditional text
is working correctly. :)

I will file an error for this document preview behavior.

Thank you very much.

regards,
Sven

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de wrote:

 So it's a Calc sheet actually. I would simply use Calc to concatenate the
 proper field contents and then use that calculated field for the mail
 merge.
 Something like =TRIM($A2 $B2 $C2) with a column title in the firs
 row copied down along the list.

 A database query would be easier to handle because it automatically applies
 to the whole record set:
 Something like:
 SELECT
 LTRIM(CONCAT(Title,CONCAT(' ',CONCAT(ForeName,CONCAT('
 ',LastName)
 AS Full Name,
 other fields
 FROM Sheet1

 This looks horrible because there is only a very limited set of functions
 when you mis-use a spreadsheet for a database connection. But with the
 right
 double-quoted names of sheets and columns it will generate a calculated
 Full Name field on the fly.
 Availlable SQL-functions with file based data sources
 http://www.openoffice.org/dba/specifications/file_based_functions.html

 Doing this in the last element of the chain is difficult. The only resource
 I know is
 http://openoffice.blogs.com/openoffice/2007/05/suppressing_bla.html
 describing a solution for a similar problem.



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Conditional-Whitespace-for-Mail-Merge-tp4139674p4139885.html
 Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated lists?

2015-02-12 Thread Gary Collins
ha ha!I guess it doesn't surprise me. Thinking about it though, that's not what 
I normally do. What I do is to open a document, then create a new one from the 
filenew menu entry. This seems to me to be the best way to do it - but maybe 
I'm wrong.
Anyway, I'm probably going to install the latest version very soon, so I'll see 
how that behaves!!
Thanks,/G.
   From: Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com
 To: Gary Collins gcatl...@yahoo.co.uk 
Cc: Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com; users@global.libreoffice.org 
users@global.libreoffice.org 
 Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2015, 13:30
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Writer: how to turn off auto-generated lists?
   
Hi :)
There are various different layers of hidden codes.  Ctrl A, Delete
only gets rid of a few of them.

Some can be seen by pressing the backwards sort of double-struck P in
the toolbar icons.  This shows non-printing characters, such as tabs
and end-of-paragraphs, that don't get printed out.  These are the ones
that get deleted by Ctrl A, delete.

If you poke around with a hex-editor or get even further (well,
slightly further) down into the 1s and 0s (with a side-bar or
something to see the ascii characters) then you see all sorts of weird
characters, most of which are incomprehensible to almost anyone but
some are human-readable and show things such as names, systems,
occasionally even addresses and phone numbers from ancient times.  I
think some of the incomprehensible ones are the ones doing screwey
things.


Yeh, Windows tries to avoid letting people develop good habits and
tries to push them into bad ones.

One of my favs was Microsoft saying you should never accept cookies
and never turn your anti-virus off for anything.  Then their own
website asked you to accept cookies and to install anything from them
they would tell you to turn off your anti-virus.  However if you did
so and ran into troubles then 'experts' would blame the user for
obviously bad habits and ignoring security issues.

One wonders why people are so surprised that Windows so frequently
runs into problems and is so open to malware and attacks.
Regards from
Tom :)





On 12 February 2015 at 12:54, Gary Collins gcatl...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 Hi Tom,


 

 A lot of people seem to open an old document and then use that to
 create new documents

 [sometimes that's the easiest way in windows]

  but that way tons of hidden formatting codes and
 stuff seem to lurk and sometimes do some really odd things.

 [I'd have thought that selecting all with Ctrl-A and hitting del or
 backspace should remove everything? perhaps not?]


  CopyPasting as unformatted text into a fresh new
 document got rid of all sorts of weird problems.

 [I'll try that, it may well work]

 Writer doesn't seem to generate lists in the way described, at least
 not for me.  Calc does, of course, but i usually have to select 3-4
 cells and then drag.  So i am not sure what is going on.


 [I've tried it here in the office with a new document, and it doesn't seem
 to do it here, either; so your explanation may well be right. I'm not sure
 if the version here and the version at home are the same, I'll check.
 The style in my home doc was default, and there was nothing I could find
 that indicated that it might be in the middle of a list. Perhaps there is a
 way of making formatting codes visible in a document? And deleting unwanted
 ones? If not, perhaps it might be a good idea if one were to be introduced?
 ]

 best,
 /Gary






  
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] installation problem LO4.4 - linux mint

2015-02-12 Thread sqroot
hallo!


I was curious to test LO4.4, so i tried to install it on Linux Mint 17 Qiana. I 
followed the installation instructions, first purged the old LO-version, 
downloaded the file, checked it, etc... installation worked fine. but when I 
try to start it, wheter from the icons or from the command line, i get this 
error message




Libre Office 4.4 - Fatal Error
The application cannot be started. 
User installation could not be completed.



any ideas, why i get this error message and how to fix it?


thank you, Markus


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] Re: Conditional Whitespace for Mail Merge

2015-02-12 Thread Andreas Säger
That wizard is counter productive and irritating for several reasons. You can
create serial letters easier without it. Once you have a registered database
connection to your list (F4 shows your database and tables), all you need to
do is this:
Select your table or query in the left pane and then drag column headers
from the right pane into your document.



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Conditional-Whitespace-for-Mail-Merge-tp4139674p4139898.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted