Re: Open DLRs

deliver_sm, try talking to your SMSc. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: brett skinner To: users@kannel.org Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 11:17 AM Subject: Re: Open DLRs Hi Nikos Thanks for your reply. That is the impression that I got. The only thing that is a little confusing

Re: Open DLRs

...@gmail.com Hi, How then did you get the submit_sm_resp from the SMSc? BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: brett skinner To: users@kannel.org Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 12:37 PM Subject: Re: Open DLRs Hi It turns out that I had commented out the section where I put

Re: Open DLRs

01, 2010 10:26 AM Subject: Re: Open DLRs Hi I am assuming because I had bound as a transmitter and was sending submit_sm packets that they were responding with submit_sm_resp. I think that is according to SMPP 3.4 spec. The only problem is that I was not getting the delivery receipts

Re: Open DLRs

sense, but is difficult to say, since you never submitted any logs. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: brett skinner To: users@kannel.org Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:26 AM Subject: Re: Open DLRs Hi I am assuming because I had bound as a transmitter and was sending

Re: Open DLRs

Subject: Re: Open DLRs It makes perfect sense according to the SMPP specification. A connection is either bound as transmitter, receiver or both (transceiver). A transmitter is for messages set to SMSC from ESME. A receiver is for messages from SMSC to EMSE. Transceiver does both. So

RE: Open DLRs

. == Rene -Original Message- From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Nikos Balkanas Sent: donderdag 1 juli 2010 17:03 To: brett skinner; users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Open DLRs Submit_sm_resp is originated on the SMSc. Therefore it, is sent over the Receiver

Re: Open DLRs

I guess you can teach an old dog new tricks :-) Nikos - Original Message - From: Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl To: 'Nikos Balkanas' nbalka...@gmail.com; 'brett skinner' tatty.dishcl...@gmail.com; users@kannel.org Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 6:45 PM Subject: RE: Open DLRs

Re: Open DLRs

Hi, The documentation is correct. DLR entries (internal to kannel but without final status) are created and inserted when the SMS is accepted by the SMSc and deleted when the external DLR (with final status) arrives from the SMSc. This could last for the time it takes to deliver the SMS to

Re: Open DLRs

Hi Nikos Thanks for your reply. That is the impression that I got. The only thing that is a little confusing right now is that I am not seeing the temporary DLRs in the MySQL table ever being removed. I am using SMPP and am testing by sending to an actual SMSC and I am getting the message on my

Re: Open DLRs

Hi, No. You have done all you needed from kannel's side. If not seeing deliver_sm, try talking to your SMSc. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: brett skinner To: users@kannel.org Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 11:17 AM Subject: Re: Open DLRs Hi Nikos Thanks for your reply

Re: Open DLRs

talking to your SMSc. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: brett skinner To: users@kannel.org Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 11:17 AM Subject: Re: Open DLRs Hi Nikos Thanks for your reply. That is the impression that I got. The only thing that is a little confusing right now

Re: Open DLRs

Hi, How then did you get the submit_sm_resp from the SMSc? BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: brett skinner To: users@kannel.org Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 12:37 PM Subject: Re: Open DLRs Hi It turns out that I had commented out the section where I put the bind