Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8)

2009-12-10 Thread Kyriacos Sakkas
?mode=mail_to_individualemail=us...@kannel.orgoutput=webels=9f7d1dbec44c47f17b204f700a401c51 *Sent:* Friday, December 04, 2009 8:46 PM *Subject:* Re: Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8) Hi, Faced similar issues with 2 major operators in India

Re: Re: Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8)

2009-12-05 Thread Sandesh K
: Sandesh K To: n...@amdtelecom.net Cc: alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com ; users@kannel.org Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 8:46 PM Subject: Re: Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8) gt;Hi, gt; gt;Faced similar issues with 2 major operators in India. But the question

Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8)

2009-12-04 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Enabling dlr-mask and dlr-url will get you the NACK message as a DLR. If you're using latest CVS you'll get some extra values as meta-data as well. Regards, Alex On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kyriacos Sakkas kyria...@netsmart.com.cywrote: Firstly apologies to all if this is documented

Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8)

2009-12-04 Thread Kyriacos Sakkas
Hmm, I am using an oldish version, need to check if meta-data is there... Still the DLR returns nothing, not doubting you but at least on the version I am running a DLR record does not even get created when its NACked, so that something can be returned. Kyriacos Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:

Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8)

2009-12-04 Thread Arne K. Haaje
I've had the same experience, and there is a dirty work around for this; It should work setting dlr-mask=24 to give you a call to your url for rejected and acked, but it does not seem to work. However, if you set dlr-mask=31 a dlr will get created, and your url will be called for both status 8

Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8)

2009-12-04 Thread alejandro . guerrieri
15:40:16 To: users@kannel.org Cc: Kyriacos Sakkaskyria...@netsmart.com.cy; Alejandro Guerrierialejandro.guerri...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8) I've had the same experience, and there is a dirty work around for this; It should work setting dlr-mask=24

Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8)

2009-12-04 Thread Nikos Balkanas
...@gmail.com To: Arne K. Haaje a...@drlinux.no; us...@kannel. us...@kannel. Org users@kannel.org Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 5:03 PM Subject: Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8) This works fine on latest cvs for sure. Dlr-mask 24 should give you ack and nack, and also

Re: Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8)

2009-12-04 Thread Sandesh K
; us...@kannel. us...@kannel. Org Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 5:03 PM Subject: Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8) This works fine on latest cvs for sure. Dlr-mask 24 should give you ack and nack, and also extra meta-data (error code, message I'd, etc