Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

Thanks. Is it also kannel based? Davor Sent from my iPad > On 22.9.2016, at 19:39, vinayak mv wrote: > > Dear Davor, > > There is also an alternative solution for SMPP Server i.e. vsmppbox ,which > has more features compared to other smpp servers.you can find the

Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

Hi Stipe, Thanks for confirming. Yes, I would like to have more details about the mentioned product. Davor Sent from my iPad > On 22.9.2016, at 16:03, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Am 21.09.2016 08:25, schrieb Davor Spasoski: >> Hi, >> >> I realized yesterday that the reason the

Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

Dear Davor, There is also an alternative solution for SMPP Server i.e. vsmppbox ,which has more features compared to other smpp servers.you can find the details of that in http://www.evoxtel.com > On 22-Sep-2016, at 7:32 PM, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Am 21.09.2016 08:25,

Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

Am 21.09.2016 08:25, schrieb Davor Spasoski: Hi, I realized yesterday that the reason the allowed/preferred trickery doesn’t work is because opensmppbox doesn’t pass smsc-id dynamically. It’s either a static value using the route-to-smsc directive or it’s blank if this is omitted. The whole