[one-users] [Beta 3.0] onevnet list reports incorrect number of leases

I have just noticed that onevnet list command reports an incorrect number of leases. I have a virtual network which initially has been created with only one IP address and after that leases have added using the XML-RPC interface. This is what onevnet list and show commands display: Is this a bug?

Re: [one-users] hooks execution on remote nodes without shared ONE installation dir

Hi, The mechanism you are referring to is the 'onehost sync', it has to be executed as oneadmin in the front-end. This will force the hooks and drivers scripts to be copied to the hosts in the next monitorization cycle. Regards. -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Major Contributor OpenNebula - The

Re: [one-users] How config Windows vm template?

Hi André, Looks like we don't have many users virtualizing windows machines. Maybe this kind of questions can be better helped in a windows support list... Since you took the time to create and share the contextualization scripts, if you come up with a working procedure and want to contribute a

Re: [one-users] Multiple Transfer Managers

Hi Saurav, Currently OpenNebula can load multiple Transfer Managers, so you can choose a different one for each host; i.e. a host could use tm_ssh and another one tm_nfs. You cannot use different Transfer Managers for different kind of files. However, it should be easy to modify one of the

Re: [one-users] internal error Only 1 ide controller is supported

That's right, it is a libvirt/kvm limitation. We'll put a warning in the KVM guide or the VM template. Thanks for the feedback! -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Major Contributor OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ |

Re: [one-users] hooks execution on remote nodes without shared ONE installation dir

Carlos Martín Sánchez wrote on 11/08/11 12:55: Hi, Hi, The mechanism you are referring to is the 'onehost sync', it has to be executed as oneadmin in the front-end. This will force the hooks and drivers scripts to be copied to the hosts in the next monitorization cycle. if 'onehost sync' has

Re: [one-users] Multiple Transfer Managers

Thank you very much for clarifying carlos. Regards Saurav Lahiri 2011/8/11 Carlos Martín Sánchez cmar...@opennebula.org Hi Saurav, Currently OpenNebula can load multiple Transfer Managers, so you can choose a different one for each host; i.e. a host could use tm_ssh and another one tm_nfs.

Re: [one-users] measuring the diration of a migration

Unfortunately I’m a newbie in Linux, so „a little grep magic” is already too much for me L Up until now I managed to list all state-transitions ( cat vm.log | grep “New VM state is” ), but how could I now get the times out of those lines, and more importantly, how can I subtract the time of

Re: [one-users] [Beta 3.0] onevnet list reports incorrect number of leases

Hi Florin, I've been able to reproduce the bug, the vnet pool information returns a different number of TOTAL_LEASES than the individual vnet information. Thanks for the feedback, you can follow the bug here [1] Regards. [1] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/772 -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project

Re: [one-users] [Beta 3.0] Wrong target value in DISK.

Hi Florin, You are right, there are different mandatory attributes if you use the image repository or not. Both methods are separated in the template reference [1]. Regards. [1] http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel2.2:template#disks_section -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Major Contributor

Re: [one-users] onevm data saving.

Hi Cris, Both behaviours are possible, depending on your storage model. With a non-shared storage, you need to successfully shutdown your VM, otherwise changes are not transferred back. In a shared storage scenario, you are using the 'master' image directly (opennebula creates a symlink) We are

[one-users] [Beta 3.0] Cluster Management

Hi there, It seems like the onecuster command has been removed from the 3.0 version and my understanding is that we need to use onehost update to insert cluster info, which has worked well in our testing environment. My question is that after we divide the hosts into several distinct clusters,