Hi!
I am trying to write my own Maven plugin. I want to be able to specify
it in a build without specifying any additional parameters. I don't
seem to find any example after some googling. In a perfect world, I
would like to write my pom like this:
build
plugins
plugin
You cannot have that, you need to bind the goal at least (and goal usually
have a preferred phase it will bind to).
Plugin that does not have execution defined but it still executes (as you
say you'd want) is usually bound to lifecycle of the packaging in it's
lifecycle mapping. So, unless you
Hi!
On 21 July 2012 10:45, Tamás Cservenák ta...@cservenak.net wrote:
You cannot have that, you need to bind the goal at least (and goal usually
have a preferred phase it will bind to).
Plugin that does not have execution defined but it still executes (as you
say you'd want) is usually bound
I'd start with
http://www.sonatype.com/books/mvnref-book/reference/writing-plugins-sect-intro.html
And have a good look at
http://www.sonatype.com/books/mvnref-book/reference/writing-plugins-sect-plugins-lifecycle.html#writing-plugins-sect-override-default-lifecycle
-Robert
Op Sat, 21 Jul
That's strange, but when I booted up in safe mode, deleted ~6GB of temp
files, defragmentated a little bit, it works! It works like a charm!
Plugin that does not have execution defined but it still executes (as you
say you'd want) is usually bound to lifecycle of the packaging in it's
lifecycle mapping. So, unless you write your own packaging (I doubt this is
what you need), you are left to declare plugin _with_ executions.
But
That's strange, but when I booted up in safe mode, deleted ~6GB of temp
files, defragmentated a little bit, it works! It works like a charm!
As anticipated, Windows is actively preventing you from getting your
work done. Consider a different OS or working in a Linux VM - and yes
I realize this
I worked with Linux, it's pretty good, but I prefer Windows (at least until
Steam gets ported to Linux).
On 21 July 2012 20:51, Wayne Fay wayne...@gmail.com wrote:
Plugin that does not have execution defined but it still executes (as you
say you'd want) is usually bound to lifecycle of the packaging in it's
lifecycle mapping. So, unless you write your own packaging (I doubt this is
what you
You might want to try the VM-based approach. I use VirtualBox and
Ubuntu and it works out very well. I can still play Battlefield 3 on
my windows host and when I want to do some work, I fire up the VM! :)
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Cysioland cysiol...@gmail.com wrote:
I worked with
Hello maven fans,
I've become slightly balder today. I've been tearing my hair over why JPA keeps
insisting it cannot find my persistence unit. Everything in my persistence.xml
file is correct I've checked it over an over.
I've just discovered that the problem is not in the JPA provider
Maven just refuses to include META-INF/persistence.xml in the jar no matter
what I do! It resides in src/main/resources/META-INF. After building it is
also
in target/classes/META-INF along with MANIFEST.MF, but it is missing in the
jar file.
Try a very simple test...
Run mvn
I worked with Linux, it's pretty good, but I prefer Windows (at least until
Steam gets ported to Linux).
Good news for those of us who game on our PCs when not building apps
with Maven... ;-)
13 matches
Mail list logo