Yeah, I understand the problem with the main method. Fyi, there's an
active intellij ticket with more discussion about this:
https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-107048
Another kind of awkward workaround is to create a maven run configuration
with the desired scope:
Olivier Lamy wrote on 26.02.2015 15:26:
As it looks the question is related to an other project which is not hosted
within the Apache Maven project neither developed by Apache Maven
committers.
I believe this mailing list is related to the Apache Maven project.
So my goal was only to help
Thank you for the replies.
Martin: Will the maven-assemby-plugin also exclude transitive dependencies?
Ben: Our users are used to run Flink programs out of the main() method, so
IntelliJ will not include the required jars into the classpath.
I basically want some dependencies to be 'provided'
Yes... but we should be inclusive and generally allowing the questions and were
needed redirect to better forums if we are aware of them.
And when comparing it to Ubuntu... there are the big mailing lists that answer
all these kind of questions are a general busy hub of everything.
I think
On Feb 27, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Curtis Rueden ctrue...@wisc.edu wrote:
Hi Manfred,
I think the same should apply for all other plugins.
By that logic, an Ubuntu Linux mailing list should answer all questions
about all packages available for Ubuntu, even multiverse packages. Seems
Hi Jason,
Absolutely, my apologies. I didn't mean to imply anything about Takari
specifically. Your efforts, as always, are fantastic and a real credit to
the OSS community. I was speaking more philosophically about the scope of
the list in general.
And actually, I think Manfred and I are not
Hi Manfred,
I think the same should apply for all other plugins.
By that logic, an Ubuntu Linux mailing list should answer all questions
about all packages available for Ubuntu, even multiverse packages. Seems
impossible to me.
That said, of course the people here are friendly and make a best
