Hi Michael,
michael.ctr.taru...@faa.gov wrote:
> My apology about part of this reply. I did not understand part of your
> suggestion.
>
> I thought you were saying 3.0.5 is the latest release.
>
> That said, I don't see how using the latest release or an older release
> makes any difference.
What is "import scope"?
I don't see anything in either my settings.xml or pom.xml that explicitly
declares this. (And I call this my POM, but I inherited it from someone else).
Can you explain " you are using dependencyManagement with dependencies declared
with scope "import""?
Michael
Thank you Curtis.
Michael Tarullo
Contractor (Engility Corp)
Enterprise Architect
NSRR System Administrator
FAA WJH Technical Center
(609)485-5294
-Original Message-
From: ctrueden.w...@gmail.com [mailto:ctrueden.w...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Curtis Rueden
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015
Hi Michael,
> Can you explain " you are using dependencyManagement with dependencies
> declared with scope "import""?
https://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html#Importing_Dependencies
> I don't see anything in either my settings.xml or pom.xml that
>
Wayne,
I have determined, to the best of my ability, that the version of Maven used to
execute this POM was probably about 2.2.1. It could have been an earlier
version but not a later.
Now I was able to obtain this version from the Maven archives but one question
I have is what POM model
Hello,
I am saying that copy-dependencies is a often used method to download
some or all dependencies of a projects. It depends on a consistent
repository and POM model.
So it is not "only a copy which does not look at the content" as you
started, and therefore the "it is clearly a plugin or
What do you mean by a consistent repository and POM model?
If you mean that the POM must be declaring files to copy that are in the
repository, that is stating the obvious.
And in this case, the POM is doing exactly that. The files I am asking to be
copied from the repository are actually in
To anyone following this absolutely frustrating thread, neither v3.0.5 nor
v3.3.3 solved this problem. V3.3.3 resulted in the same error and v3.0.5
failed with a different error!!!
Michael Tarullo
Contractor (Engility Corp)
Enterprise Architect
NSRR System Administrator
FAA WJH Technical
Hello,
it is not very pleasant to help you with that kind of tone, and
its rather strange that redhat refers paying customers to oss
projects to fix up their projects...
Anyway, the super pom downloads a lot of stuff because your
dependencies declare transitive dependencies and maven is designed
There are no transitive dependencies!
This is not even building source code!!!
It is simply copying ZIP/MD5/SHA1 files from a Nexus repository to a local
workstation.
Michael Tarullo
Contractor (Engility Corp)
Enterprise Architect
NSRR System Administrator
FAA WJH Technical Center
Hi Michael,
michael.ctr.taru...@faa.gov wrote:
> What do you mean by a consistent repository and POM model?
>
> If you mean that the POM must be declaring files to copy that are in the
> repository, that is stating the obvious.
>
> And in this case, the POM is doing exactly that. The files I
Am Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:08:02 +
schrieb :
> Answer a simple question for me, are you a Maven contributor?
I fixed your stupid pom, so why would you care?
Gruss
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Are you a Maven contributor?
Michael Tarullo
Contractor (Engility Corp)
Enterprise Architect
NSRR System Administrator
FAA WJH Technical Center
(609)485-5294
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Eckenfels [mailto:e...@zusammenkunft.net]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 5:26 PM
To:
.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:28 PM, wrote:
> Now who has a tone?
>
> Michael Tarullo
> Contractor (Engility Corp)
> Enterprise Architect
> NSRR System Administrator
> FAA WJH Technical Center
> (609)485-5294
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernd Eckenfels
Hi Michael,
I'm replying to Jörg...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 10/6/15 12:14 AM, michael.ctr.taru...@faa.gov wrote:
Karl,
Could you clarify this. I don't understand your reply.
In fact I'm not sure if you are replying to me or Jorg.
It appears to be the latter. Could you please
michael.ctr.taru...@faa.gov wrote:
> There are no transitive dependencies!
That depends totally on the declaration of the POMs for your dependencies.
You don't control this.
> This is not even building source code!!!
That's totally irrelevant.
> It is simply copying ZIP/MD5/SHA1 files from a
Now who has a tone?
Michael Tarullo
Contractor (Engility Corp)
Enterprise Architect
NSRR System Administrator
FAA WJH Technical Center
(609)485-5294
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Eckenfels [mailto:e...@zusammenkunft.net]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 5:12 PM
To:
Hi Jim,
I struggled with licensing-related tooling too when I researched it awhile
back—and my needs were simpler than yours. We ended up using
license-maven-plugin to programmatically manage license headers of all our
sources, with a single header with unified copyright date range and
Hi,
On 10/5/15 7:51 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Michael,
michael.ctr.taru...@faa.gov wrote:
My apology about part of this reply. I did not understand part of your
suggestion.
I thought you were saying 3.0.5 is the latest release.
That said, I don't see how using the latest release or an
My tone is the way it is because I would like a straight answer, not Maven
speak.
Thank you for noticing the password. It's the only thing I've understood thus
far.
Answer a simple question for me, are you a Maven contributor?
Michael Tarullo
Contractor (Engility Corp)
Enterprise Architect
Could you explain why I would need to do add exclusions?
If I download the ActiveMQ and CXF files without the Camel files the POM works
file.
Michael Tarullo
Contractor (Engility Corp)
Enterprise Architect
NSRR System Administrator
FAA WJH Technical Center
(609)485-5294
-Original
Am Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:20:20 +
schrieb :
> Could you explain why I would need to do add exclusions?
In order to stop maven from resolving all dependencies transitive until
it hits a broken one.
Gruss
Bernd
Here is why I care:
Well I'm not a Maven contributor. I don't wish to be. I don't even want to
use the product, and wouldn't if I wasn't required to for my job.
So I get the impression that certain people answer questions because they are
contributors and answer the question as if everyone
First of all you dont pay, you only demand (with multiple exclamationmarks), so
you are not a customer, and secondly me and Jörg did explain to you that maven
always resolves all dependemcies (unless you exclude them), so there is your
education. If you dont care about maven just stick in the
What are you talking about?
Of course I don't pay. It's an open source product. That's the business model
today, right use open source and save money on software development costs.
Of course until you have to get help with the product or try and read what is
almost always a poor excuse
Karl,
Could you clarify this. I don't understand your reply.
In fact I'm not sure if you are replying to me or Jorg.
It appears to be the latter. Could you please confirm?
Thank you.
Michael Tarullo
Contractor (Engility Corp)
Enterprise Architect
NSRR System Administrator
FAA WJH Technical
Thank you Karl.
Michael Tarullo
Contractor (Engility Corp)
Enterprise Architect
NSRR System Administrator
FAA WJH Technical Center
(609)485-5294
-Original Message-
From: Karl Heinz Marbaise [mailto:khmarba...@gmx.de]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 6:22 PM
To: Maven Users List;
Unlike with a SVN workspace the release:prepare goal in a Git workspace
seems to not error-out when it sees untracked (git status results
in ??) files. I have seen this on windows.
In some cases it was not mentioning the files at all (they are shown in
-X debug output) in other cases it was
Michael,
Please refrain from insulting the efforts of the people on this list trying
to help you. If you are not happy with the help you receive here, you are
free to look for it elsewhere. I would like the discussions here to stay
civil and on topic.
I hope you provide us all here with the same
Thanks Curtis,
I believe you’re correct - there really exists no perfect solution doing
continuous license management using maven, beyond some really basic stuff.
Almost all of what exists in maven land seems to only deal with homogenous
licensing of a module and management of module
michael.ctr.taru...@faa.gov wrote:
> What are you talking about?
>
> Of course I don't pay. It's an open source product.
OK, then I don't answer anymore, because it's my free time and you're
wasting it.
Cheers,
Jörg
-
To
That is fine with me, because your either wrong or incomprehensible answers are
wasting my time.
Michael Tarullo
Contractor (Engility Corp)
Enterprise Architect
NSRR System Administrator
FAA WJH Technical Center
(609)485-5294
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Schaible
Looking at the error message again, I agree there seems to be an issue
with this dependency:
Failed to read artifact descriptor for
org.jvnet.staxex:stax-ex:jar:RELEASE:
Failed to resolve version for org.jvnet.staxex:stax-ex:jar:RELEASE:
Could not find metadata
Wayne,
A few questions before I begin to investigates as per your recommendation.
Are you a committer or just a user?
I understand your request to try an older release (and I have every intention
of doing just that) but I'm a bit skeptical. Here's why. This is simply a
file copy operation
Copy Dependencies is not a simple file copy operation, it has to resolve
dependencies, which by definition has to look at meta data and POMs. If you
want to use a simple file copy a url download would be easier I guess :)
2015-10-05 16:34 GMT+02:00 :
> Wayne,
>
> A
So, the original author of this POM may not have used the correct goal to
achieve the desired outcome.
Is that in effect what you are saying?
Michael Tarullo
Contractor (Engility Corp)
Enterprise Architect
NSRR System Administrator
FAA WJH Technical Center
(609)485-5294
-Original
Wayne,
Thanks for the reply. I forgot to mention in my original post that CURRENTLY
I'm using Maven v3.1.1.
But your question is a good one, and something I didn't even consider and
therefore try to test. I should be able to revert back to and older version of
Maven provided 1) I know what
Hi,
On 10/5/15 6:24 PM, Bob Hpv wrote:
Dear all,
I was using maven 2 and the unique version for SNAPSHOT deployment.
Which version of Maven 2 have you used ? 2.2.1 ?
In this configuration if I deploy a multi-module project, I had a single
timestamp for all the modules which was very useful
Pardon me for not responding.
But your reply here is ample explanation for why I did not reply.
The "attitude" I detect from this reply is that explanation.
Is "bogus" some new software engineering term I am not familiar with, or just
the language used by someone dabbling in software because
Hi,
On 10/5/15 6:07 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
latest Maven version or 3.0.5,
> because 3.1.1. is bogus.
Can you tell me in which way 3.1.1 is bogus ?
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Dear all,
I was using maven 2 and the unique version for SNAPSHOT deployment.
In this configuration if I deploy a multi-module project, I had a single
timestamp for all the modules which was very useful when we wanted to use
one fixed SNAPSHOT.
I upgraded recently to maven 3.
With maven 3, we see
My apology about part of this reply. I did not understand part of your
suggestion.
I thought you were saying 3.0.5 is the latest release.
That said, I don't see how using the latest release or an older release makes
any difference.
I have a requirement to use 3.1.1 from a COTS product
That is exactly what I would like to know!!!
Mike
Michael Tarullo
Contractor (Engility Corp)
Enterprise Architect
NSRR System Administrator
FAA WJH Technical Center
(609)485-5294
-Original Message-
From: Karl Heinz Marbaise [mailto:khmarba...@gmx.de]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015
You asked the same question before and I gave you the advice to either try
latest Maven version or 3.0.5, because 3.1.1. is bogus. You never answered.
michael.ctr.taru...@faa.gov wrote:
> I am currently responsible for a "legacy" POM that copies ZIP files
> from the Red Hat JBoss Fuse distro in
I am trying to use the following:
mvn -V -B release:update-versions -DdevelopmentVersion=1.2.3.4-SNAPSHOT
and it keeps coming back with the following:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:2.0:update-versions
(default-cli) on project FUBAR: Missing
Karl,
Thanks for the information. Based on your response, it seems that I
have specify the SCM in order to use
maven-release-plugin. I have also found the versions-maven-plugin, which
seems to do what I want it to do, without
using the SCM from maven. There are plenty of other files that
Hi,
On 10/5/15 6:19 PM, Mehul Sanghvi wrote:
I am trying to use the following:
mvn -V -B release:update-versions -DdevelopmentVersion=1.2.3.4-SNAPSHOT
and it keeps coming back with the following:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
47 matches
Mail list logo