Re: {m1} running java from maven.xml

Hey Folks, Any tips / pointers for calling Java code from Jelly / Maven's maven.xml? I'm having classpath issues and don't want to expose it as a plugin, rather just call it from maven.xml... ta diyfiesta wrote: Hi Folks, I've writen a POJO to do something useful and wanted to use

Re: {m1} running java from maven.xml

yep, ${root.maven} and just root.maven in the jellybean classLoader attribute gave the same results :( Arnaud HERITIER wrote: You can try the classloader named root.maven Arnaud diyfiesta wrote: hmmm, in the partial listing below, for namespaces I have; xmlns:j=jelly:core

Re: {m1} running java from maven.xml

goal for example). I think that your classes are defined in the default classloader. Arnaud diyfiesta wrote: Hey Folks, Any tips / pointers for calling Java code from Jelly / Maven's maven.xml? I'm having classpath issues and don't want to expose it as a plugin, rather just call

RE: [M1] AspectJ with two source trees (main/src main/test)

in that... :-). -Original Message- From: diyfiesta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 9:53 AM To: users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: [M1] AspectJ with two source trees (main/src main/test) So, looking into this more (and having created a simple example project

RE: [M1] AspectJ with two source trees (main/src main/test)

to have a property that says to run AspectJ on the tests compilation too? -Original Message- From: diyfiesta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:01 AM To: users@maven.apache.org Subject: RE: [M1] AspectJ with two source trees (main/src main/test) Hi

Re: successful AJDT integration?

Hi, I'm using M1 so can't comment direclty on M2 stuff, but thought I'd chip in with some thoughts on source file placement. I've tried a few different approaches and have settled on putting the aspects in with the java source as I view them as java-like if not strict java (after all AJDT lets

RE: [M1] AspectJ with two source trees (main/src main/test)

posted incase its useful or intersting to anyone :) diyfiesta wrote: Thanks Jeff, hmmm, I kind of thought that this wouldn't be too far off the beaten track but perhaps it is! I managed to change most of my aspects to use execution instead of call (which in my case makes more sense, I just

Re: [M1] AspectJ with two source trees (main/src main/test)

/classes/... but the tests run from a folder called target/test-classes/... which has the compiled test code, but not the aspectj compiled code. So, if a test is affected by an aspect, it isn't in this folder. diyfiesta wrote: Hi, Thanks for the note, I tried this but still don't have

Re: [M1] AspectJ with two source trees (main/src main/test)

Hi, Thanks for the note, I tried this but still don't have any luck, for example, I'm using the convention main/src/java and main/src/test for my source trees, so adding an src/aspectj folder doesn't really fit in, if I add it to main/src/aspectj, I get the same problem (and just for

[M1] AspectJ with two source trees

Hi Folks, Was hoping someone could give me a pointer with a problem I'm having with the aspectj plugin... I've got my source code under main/src and the unit tests under main/test, however I can't get aspectj compiling both. I added this to my project.xml hoping it would pick up both, but it

Re: [M1] Running tests with jvmargs (security policy)

as an absolute path : c:/target/test-classes/testing.policy Did you try ? : -Djava.security.policy=target/test-classes/testing.policy Arnaud On 9/22/06, diyfiesta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Folks, Bit stuck on trying to run my tests with a security manager enabled and a specific policy file

[M1] Running tests with jvmargs (security policy)

Hi Folks, Bit stuck on trying to run my tests with a security manager enabled and a specific policy file. I added the security manager system property and policy setting using the following in the properties file (project.properties) and have the policy file set as a resource under for the unit