On 30/11/2007, ArneD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think the repository scanning problem as such, as described in my
original mail, should be filed as a second issue?
Yes, it looks that way.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
opinion, this should have a high prio - Archiva should always be able
to synchronize itself to the filesystem contents, shouldn't it.
Arne
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Repository-scanning-problem-in-1.0--tf4897121.html#a14134939
Sent from the archiva-users mailing list
, but I would expect that Archiva should always be able to
synchronize itself to the file system contents, regardless of the files'
timestamps.
Thanks
- Arne
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Repository-scanning-problem-in-1.0--tf4897121.html#a14025508
Sent from
as a second issue?
Thanks
- Arne
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Repository-scanning-problem-in-1.0--tf4897121.html#a14026445
Sent from the archiva-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
://www.nabble.com/Repository-scanning-problem-in-1.0--tf4897121.html#a14025501
Sent from the archiva-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
