Re: Mina stop work cause by exception in OrderedThreadPoolExecutor.Worker.run()

Thank you for coming back to me. Please do that on your own time. I just want to clear it out, but not an urgent cast. Take it easy please! 2017-01-19 17:10 GMT+08:00 Emmanuel Lécharny : > Sorry, still stuck with day job :/ Will try to squeeze one hour out of > my busy

Re: Mina stop work cause by exception in OrderedThreadPoolExecutor.Worker.run()

Sorry, still stuck with day job :/ Will try to squeeze one hour out of my busy schedule to review your explaination. I also have to do a small experiment to reproduce the issue. Thanks for your patience ! Le 17/01/2017 à 05:32, Xu Congyuan a écrit : > Dear all, Hope you are doing well. > >

Re: Mina stop work cause by exception in OrderedThreadPoolExecutor.Worker.run()

Le 17/01/2017 à 05:32, Xu Congyuan a écrit : > Dear all, Hope you are doing well. > > Please kindly advise if the problem I found is on processing. Any > informations , please feel free to let me know. Sorry, was busy.. I will reply today. -- Emmanuel Lecharny Symas.com directory.apache.org

Re: Mina stop work cause by exception in OrderedThreadPoolExecutor.Worker.run()

Dear all, Hope you are doing well. Please kindly advise if the problem I found is on processing. Any informations , please feel free to let me know. 2017-01-13 9:12 GMT+08:00 Xu Congyuan : > Thanks for reply. Sorry for not clear it. > Basically, we will get the number of

Re: Mina stop work cause by exception in OrderedThreadPoolExecutor.Worker.run()

Thanks for reply. Sorry for not clear it. Basically, we will get the number of idleWorkers 0 or more than 0, if idleWorkers = 0, that's meaning no work is idle, we should add workers if it's necessary; if idleWorkers > 0 , that's meaning there are idle works, no necessary to add workers. Do I get

Re: Mina stop work cause by exception in OrderedThreadPoolExecutor.Worker.run()

Hi ! sorry for the delayed response, was busy... I'm not sure I understand : if you get an exception in the runTasks() call, the 'finally' code is executed, and the number of idle worker is incremented, no matter what... Can you check that ? -- Emmanuel Lecharny Symas.com