hi,Anderson Guo,
if we use heart-beat detection mechanism,is it suitable to send heart-beat
when the session is idle as follows:
public void sessionIdle(IoSession iosession, IdleStatus idlestatus){
heartBeat();
}
if not,should we new a thread to use heart-beat detection mechanism ?
Best
Hi, Anderson Guo,
Thanks for your reply.
As you guess, my connection is a long-term connection and I hope it can recover
as soon as the computer resumes from a standby mode.
In standby mode, I think all programs and connections would go to sleep and
also the heart-beat detection mechanism.
I agree with Anderson .
- Original Message -
From: Wenrui Guo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@mina.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:19 PM
Subject: RE: About the time limit of connection keeps valid from standby mode
Hi, Li
I wonder if you understanding my explanation. But
li wrote:
Thanks for all replies.
I think I have got the answer although a little regret.
There is nothing to regret : when it's impossible, it's impossible ;)
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Hi, Li
You write a wrong connection recovery handling block. Refer the following code
snippet if you want to make the application can work well in all cases:
/**
* connect to specified MC identified by incoming internet address
*
* @param addr
*
Hi,anderson,
Your solution is effective,it looks great.
Really admire your work!
Best Regards!
- Original Message -
From: Wenrui Guo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Allen Jiang [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@mina.apache.org; Apache
Mina高性能通信框架研究邮件列表 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11,
Hi, Li
It doesn't matter, just use the similar code I represented as below.
It could be applied to MINA 1.x and MINA 2.x. I saw the source code change
between 1.7 and 2.0-M1. :P
BR
anderson
-Original Message-
From: li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008
Hi, anderson
Thanks. I will try it.
Regards,
Li
Subject: RE: About the time limit of connection keeps valid from standby mode
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:10:12 +0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@mina.apache.org
Hi, Li
It doesn't matter, just use the similar code I represented as
+1 :)
2008/9/11 Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wenrui Guo wrote:
Hi Wentrui,
BTW, I do believe experts in the mailing list can give more proper and
complete solution than what I will give later.
There are no such separation between 'experts' and users ! The MINA's
users sometime
Hi,
jan de vries wrote:
Hello,
I have a class which stores session specific data with
session.setAttribute(SessionState.STATE_KEY, ss);
But this contains data like (CharsetEncoder) which usage should not be
interleaved
by doDecode and encode.
H. Don't you use a CharsetEncoder for sent
One strategy would be to synchronize the 'session' instance itself.
jan de vries wrote:
Well, it was just an example to make my point clear. My SessionState
contaans a lot more then that.
For the decoder you are right, but the encoder CharsetEncoder can give
problems since
Session.write might
jan de vries wrote:
Well, it was just an example to make my point clear. My SessionState
contaans a lot more then that.
For the decoder you are right, but the encoder CharsetEncoder can give
problems since
Session.write might be called simultaneously if i understand the
documentation
12 matches
Mail list logo
