Re: JSF 2.3

Thanks Thomas.  Looking forward to trying it out On 18/11/2017 13:16, Thomas Andraschko wrote: 1) I think we can ship 2.3.0 this year, there are only some issues left. 2) I would ask that the TomEE guys ;) I also think that TomEE is not ready for a 8.0 release yet ;) 2017-11-18 12:43 GMT+01:00

Re: JSF 2.3

1) I think we can ship 2.3.0 this year, there are only some issues left. 2) I would ask that the TomEE guys ;) I also think that TomEE is not ready for a 8.0 release yet ;) 2017-11-18 12:43 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead : > Hi, > When is 2.3 moving out of beta?

JSF 2.3

Hi, When is 2.3 moving out of beta? https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/fb_tomee8/pom.xml TomEE 8 is using MyFaces 2.2.12 but I thought it would be shipping with 2.3?

[ANNOUNCE] JSFCentral Episode 33: Manfred Riem discusses JSF 2.3, MVC 1.0, and Mojarra

Hello, I'm pleased to announce a new podcast on JSFCentral.com. In this interview, I talk with Manfred Riem about his favorite features in JSF 2.2, what it's like working on the Mojarra JSF implementation, upcoming features in JSF 2.3, and the new MVC 1.0 JSR. Read the entire interview here

JSF 2.3

Hello, Any opinions on this https://weblogs.java.net/blog/mriem/archive/2014/01/13/jsf-tip-56-using-action-based-prototype-mojarra Basically it's regarding the common opinon that JavaEE should have a action based framework or support a action based style in JSF. cheers

Re: JSF 2.3

If they add support for such actions with @RequestMapping, then it should also be possible to declare request params as method params. e.g. @RequestMapping(...) public void doSomething(@RequestParameter(name=..) private String test) And of course conversion/validation of the request parameters.

Re: JSF 2.3

Could you explain what the actual benefits of the action based programming style are? I am missing the purpose/use cases for the actual need of such a feature. Thanks in advance! Mit freundlichen Grüßen, *Christian

Re: JSF 2.3

Action based vs component based is a frequently discussed topic and you can probably find many resources arguing for one or the other. I really like JSF but I am still curious about stuff like this. For example if I want to use a third part javascript library for special corner cases it might be

Re: JSF 2.3

Not really but it's just matter of taste ;) 2014/1/14 Karl Kildén karl.kil...@gmail.com Action based vs component based is a frequently discussed topic and you can probably find many resources arguing for one or the other. I really like JSF but I am still curious about stuff like this. For

Re: JSF 2.3

all this time. I'm not sure if I care about action chaining, but I like explicit page initialization. So I'm glad to see that action support is being considered for JSF 2.3. I think the explicit action/form declarations can be helpful. I'm glad that MyFaces is working on statelessness

Re: JSF 2.3

to see that action support is being considered for JSF 2.3. I think the explicit action/form declarations can be helpful. I'm glad that MyFaces is working on statelessness. At some point, it may indeed be practical to upgrade this project to JSF without losing all of the benefits that I now

Re: JSF 2.3

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.comwrote: Hope this helps. +1 Mike and thanks for sharing. it's good to hear/know this about struts. when i learned java ee 6 via java ee 6 tutorial, of course, JSF is mentioned there; i don't remember struts being mentioned