Re: t:saveState + ListDataModel+ client state saving = NotSerializableException

2005-10-05 Thread Mathias Brökelmann
The resulting state object will not be serialized if state is held on server. It is simply put into the session as it is. 2005/10/5, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Can someone please explain the behavioral differences of the following two scenarios? The JSP in both cases has t:saveState

Re: t:saveState + ListDataModel+ client state saving = NotSerializableException

2005-10-05 Thread Martin Marinschek
? the last time I looked, MyFaces serialized the session objects whatever the state-saving setting was, actually something we should make configurable. Has this changed? regards, Martin On 10/5/05, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The resulting state object will not be serialized

Re: t:saveState + ListDataModel+ client state saving = NotSerializableException

2005-10-05 Thread Werner Punz
I have written a non serializing scope control based upon savestate a while ago, it still is lingering in jsf-comp I will dump it in the sandbox next weekend. What I did basically was to bypass the entire serialisation within the component entirely and to dump it into the session and having a

t:saveState + ListDataModel+ client state saving = NotSerializableException

2005-10-04 Thread Dennis Byrne
Can someone please explain the behavioral differences of the following two scenarios? The JSP in both cases has t:saveState value=#{bb.dataModel}/. 1.) No Exception if javax.faces.STATE_SAVING_METHOD=server in the DD . 2.) NotSerializableException if javax.faces.STATE_SAVING_METHOD=client